Literature DB >> 26247570

Motivating first-time, group O blood donors to return: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a post-donation telephone interview.

Janis L France1, Christopher R France2, Bruce W Carlson2, Debra A Kessler3, Mark Rebosa3, Beth H Shaz3, Katrala Madden4, Patricia M Carey4.   

Abstract

First-time blood donors are essential to the US donor pool, providing nearly a third of all donations. Unfortunately, there are a wide variety of obstacles to repeat donation and new donors are extremely difficult to retain. Because each donor experiences a unique set of deterrents, we developed a post-donation interview based on motivational interview principles in order to flexibly address individual barriers. The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to examine retention of first-time, group O blood donors who are randomly assigned to receive either a telephone-delivered interview with motivational and action planning components or a standard-of-care control call approximately six weeks after their donation. Measures of donation attitude, perceived behavioral control, intention, and motivational autonomy will be measured before and after the telephone contact using online surveys, and donation attempts will be tracked for one year using blood center donor databases. We hypothesize that, compared to controls, donors who receive the telephone interview will be more likely to make a donation attempt over the following year. In addition, we will examine possible mechanisms of action of the interview using key predictors of donation behavior as described by Self Determination Theory (i.e., motivational autonomy) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (i.e., attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention). Results of this intervention may help to support a novel strategy to enhance retention of selected blood donors in an effort to better meet the nation's blood supply needs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood donation; Clinical trial; Implementation intention; Motivational interview

Year:  2015        PMID: 26247570      PMCID: PMC4740279          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  44 in total

1.  Increasing blood availability by changing donation patterns.

Authors:  George B Schreiber; Ana M Sanchez; Simone A Glynn; David J Wright
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to blood donation: the importance of self-efficacy.

Authors:  M Giles; C McClenahan; E Cairns; J Mallet
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2004-05-20

3.  Implementation intentions and shielding goal striving from unwanted thoughts and feelings.

Authors:  Anja Achtziger; Peter M Gollwitzer; Paschal Sheeran
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-03

4.  Changing age distribution of the blood donor population in the United States.

Authors:  Shimian Zou; Fatemeh Musavi; Edward P Notari; Chyang T Fang
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Which survey questions change behavior? Randomized controlled trial of mere measurement interventions.

Authors:  Gaston Godin; Paschal Sheeran; Mark Conner; Gilles Delage; Marc Germain; Ariane Bélanger-Gravel; Herminé Naccache
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Brief motivational interviewing to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy: development and qualitative pilot assessment of an intervention.

Authors:  Monica S Adamian; Carol E Golin; Lara S Shain; Brenda DeVellis
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.078

7.  Myopia prevention, near work, and visual acuity of college students: integrating the theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory.

Authors:  Derwin King-Chung Chan; Ying-Ki Fung; Suxuan Xing; Martin S Hagger
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2013-02-13

8.  Use of mental simulations to change theory of planned behaviour variables.

Authors:  Christopher J Armitage; John G Reidy
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2007-07-23

9.  Predicting intentions to donate blood among nondonors in Australia: an extended theory of planned behavior.

Authors:  Natalie G Robinson; Barbara M Masser; Katherine M White; Melissa K Hyde; Deborah J Terry
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of antecedents of blood donation behavior and intentions.

Authors:  Timothy C Bednall; Liliana L Bove; Ali Cheetham; Andrea L Murray
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  4 in total

1.  A motivational interview promotes retention of blood donors with high internal motivation.

Authors:  Christopher R France; Janis L France; Bruce W Carlson; Lina K Himawan; Debra A Kessler; Mark Rebosa; Beth H Shaz; Katrala Madden; Patricia M Carey; P Maxwell Slepian; Brett Ankawi; Irina E Livitz; Kristen R Fox
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  A brief motivational interview with action and coping planning components enhances motivational autonomy among volunteer blood donors.

Authors:  Christopher R France; Janis L France; Bruce W Carlson; Debra A Kessler; Mark Rebosa; Beth H Shaz; Katrala Madden; Patricia M Carey; Kristen R Fox; Irina E Livitz; Brett Ankawi; P Maxwell Slepian
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Determinants of the intention to participate in a programme of plasma donation for fractionation among men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Ludivine Veillette-Bourbeau; Joanne Otis; Antoine Lewin; Gaston Godin; Marc Germain; Gabriel Daunais-Laurin; Frédérick Lalonde; Jessica Caruso; Geneviève Myhal; Frédérick Pronovost
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.996

4.  Longer-term efficiency and safety of increasing the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): extension study of a randomised trial of 20 757 blood donors.

Authors:  Stephen Kaptoge; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Carmel Moore; Matthew Walker; Jane Armitage; Willem H Ouwehand; David J Roberts; John Danesh; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 30.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.