| Literature DB >> 26247383 |
Mariana Cavalheiro Magri1, Karim Yaqub Ibrahim2, Walkyria Pereira Pinto2, Francisco Oscar de Siqueira França2, Wanderley Marques Bernardo3, Fátima Mitiko Tengan2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in Brazil's inmate population. METHODS Systematic review on hepatitis C virus infection in the inmate population. Brazilian studies published from January 1, 1989 to February 20, 2014 were evaluated. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using a scale of 0 to 8 points. RESULTS Eleven eligible studies were analyzed and provided data on hepatitis C virus infection among 4,375 inmates from seven states of Brazil, with a mean quality classification of 7.4. The overall hepatitis C virus prevalence among Brazilian inmates was 13.6% (ranging from 1.0% to 41.0%, depending on the study). The chances of inmates being seropositive for hepatitis C virus in the states of Minas Gerais (MG), Sergipe (SE), Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Goiás (GO) and Espirito Santo (ES) were 84.0% (95%CI 0.06;0.45), 92.0% (95%CI 0.04;0.13), 88.0% (95%CI 0.09;0.18), 74.0% (95%CI 0.16;0.42), 84.0% (95%CI 0.08;0.31) and 89.0% (95%CI 0.01;0.05) respectively, lower than that observed in the Sao Paulo state (seroprevalence of 29.3%). The four studies conducted in the city of Sao Paulo revealed a lower prevalence in more recent studies compared to older ones. CONCLUSIONS The highest prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in Brazil's inmate population was found in Sao Paulo, which may reflect the urban diversity of the country. Despite Brazilian studies having good methodological quality to evaluate the prevalence of the hepatitis C virus, they are scarce and lack data on risk factors associated with this infection, which could support decisions on prevention and implementation of public health policies for Brazilian prisons.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26247383 PMCID: PMC4544450 DOI: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005886
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Saude Publica ISSN: 0034-8910 Impact factor: 2.106
Selected studies and prevalence of hepatitis C virus among inmate populations in Brazil.
| Citation | Location (city, state) | Year of study | Sample size | Sex | Age (years) | Positive samples | Seroprevalence (%) | 95%CI | Methods of anti-HCV detection | Confirmatory tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massad et al26 (1999) | Sao Paulo, SP | 1993-1994 | 631 | M | 18-80 | 215/631 | 34.1 | 30.4;37.8 | ELISA - Abbott Laboratories (2nd generation kit) | Immunoblot kit - Embrabio, Brazil (203/215, 94.4%) |
| Miranda et al27 (2000) | Sao Paulo, SP | 1997 | 121 | F | N/A | 23/121 | 19.0 | 12.0;25.9 | Imx HCV assay - Abbott Laboratories (generation N/A) | – |
| Catalan-Soares et al10 (2000) | Manhuaçu, MG | N/A | 63 | M | N/A | 4/63 | 6.34 | ELISA - Ortho, USA (generation N/A) | – | |
| Guimarães et al18 (2001) | Sao Paulo, SP | 1993-1994 | 756 | M | N/A | 310/756 | 41.0 | INNOTEST HCV Ab III - Innogenetics, Belgium (3rd generation) | Undetermined results were submitted to: INNO-LIA HCV Ab - Innogenetics, Belgium (N/A) | |
| Strazza et al40 (2007) | Sao Paulo, SP | 2000 | 290 | F | 18-65 | N/A | 16.2 | HBK 425 Hemobio HCV - Embrabio, Brazil (3rd generation) | INNO-LIA HCV Ab III - Innogenetics, Belgium (N/A) | |
| Coelho et al11 (2009) | Ribeirao Preto, SP | 2003 | 333 | M | 19-69 mean 30.1 | 29/333 | 8.7 | 5.7;11.7 | Bioelisa HCV - Biokit, Spain (generation N/A) | – |
| Santos et al36 (2011) | M = Areia Branca, SE F = N/A, SE | 2009M/2010F | 422 303M/119F | M/F | mean 32.7 (SD = 8.8) | 13/422 | 3.1 | HCV Rapid Test Bioeasy (generation N/A) | PCR – in-house (11/12, 91.7%) | |
| Pompilio et al32 (2011) | Campo Grande, MS | 2009 | 686 443M/243F | M/F | N/A | 33/686 | 4.8 7.0M/0.8F | 3.4;6.8 | Bioelisa HCV 4.0, BioKit, Spain (3rd generation) Immunoassay - ImmunoComb II HCV kit - Orgenics, Germany (generation N/A) | Weakly reactive results were submitted to: INNO-LIA HCV Ab III - Innogenetics, Belgium (N/A) RT-PCR – in-house (20/29, 69.0%) |
| Rosa et al35 (2012) | Santa Cruz do Sul, RS | 2010-2011 | 195 179M/16F | M/F | 19-69 mean 33 (SD = 10.4) | 19/195 | 9.7 | HCV Rapid Test Bioeasy (generation N/A) | – | |
| Barros et al7 (2013) | Goiania, GO | 2007-2008 | 148 | F | ≤ 30 (60.1%) | 9/148 | 6.1 | 3.0;11.6 | ELISA - Abbott Laboratories, Brazil (generation N/A) | Weakly reactive results were submitted to: INNO-LIA HCV Ab III, Innogenetics, Belgium RT-PCR - in-house (5/9, 55.5%) |
| Falquetto et al12 (2013) | Colatina, ES | 2010 | 730 | M/F | 18-N/A | 7/730 | 1.0 | HCV Rapid Test Bioeasy (3rd generation) | RT-PCR – in-house (7/7, 100%) |
F: female; M: male; N/A: not available; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; RT-PCR: reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
FigureFlowchart of study selection in the different phases of the systematic review.
Table 2Quality assessment of the studies included in the review.
Prevalence of hepatitis C virus among inmate populations grouped into seven different states of Brazil.
| State | Positive samples | Sample size | HCV sero-prevalence (%) | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Sao Paulo | 624 | 2,131 | 29.3 | 27.3 | 31.2 | Ref. | – | – |
|
| Minas Gerais | 4 | 63 | 6.3 | 0.3 | 12.4 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.45 | |
| Sergipe | 13 | 422 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 4.7 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.13 | |
| Mato Grosso do Sul | 33 | 686 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 6.4 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.18 | |
| Rio Grande do Sul | 19 | 195 | 9.7 | 5.6 | 13.9 | 0.26 | 0.16 | 0.42 | |
| Goias | 9 | 148 | 6.1 | 2.2 | 9.9 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.31 | |
| Espirito Santo | 7 | 730 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 | |
| Total | 709 | 4,375 | 16.2 | 15.1 | 17.3 | – | – | – | |
Ref.: Reference category (based on the highest seroprevalence – Sao Paulo)
Prevalence of hepatitis C virus among inmate populations from the four studies conducted in the city of Sao Paulo.
| Citation | Year of study | Positive samples | Sample size | HCV sero-prevalence (%) | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||||
| Massad et al26 (1999) | 1993-1994 | 215 | 631 | 34.1 | 30.4 | 37.8 | Ref. |
| ||
| Guimarães et al18 (2001) | 1993-1994 | 310 | 756 | 41.0 | 37.5 | 44.5 | 1.35 | 1.08 | 1.68 | |
| Miranda et al27 (2000) | 1997 | 23 | 121 | 19.0 | 12.0 | 26.0 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.74 | |
| Strazza et al40 (2007) | 2000 | 47 | 290 | 16.2 | 12.0 | 20.4 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.53 | |
Ref.: Reference category (based on the year of sample collection)