| Literature DB >> 26247324 |
Farah Maria Drumond Chequer1, Thiago Mescoloto Lizier2, Rafael de Felício3, Maria Valnice Boldrin Zanoni2, Hosana Maria Debonsi3, Norberto Peporine Lopes3, Danielle Palma de Oliveira4.
Abstract
Common water pollutants, azo dyes and their degradation products have frequently shown toxicity, including carcinogenic and mutagenic effects, and can induce serious damage in aquatic organisms and humans. In the present study, the mutagenic potential of the azo dye Disperse Red 13 (DR13) was first evaluated using the Micronucleus Assay in human lymphocytes. Subsequently, in order to mimic hepatic biotransformation, controlled potential electrolysis was carried out with a DR13 solution using a Potentiostat/Galvanostat. In addition, a DR13 solution was oxidized using S9 (homogenate of rat liver cells). DR13 oxidation and the reduction products were identified using HPLC-DAD and GC/MS, and their mutagenic potential investigated by way of a Salmonella/microsome assay using TA98 and YG1041 strains, with no S9. The original azo dye DR13 induced chromosomal damage in human lymphocytes, and the respective oxidation and reduction products also showed mutagenic activity, as detected by the Salmonella/microsome assay. Furthermore sulfate 2-[(4-aminophenyl)ethylamino]-ethanol monohydrate, 2-chloro-4-nitro-benzamine, 4-nitro-benzamine and 2-(ethylphenylamine)-ethanol were identified as products of the DR13 reduction/oxidation reactions. Thus it was concluded that the contamination of water effluents with DR13 is a health risk not only due to the dye itself, but also due to the possibility of drinking contaminated water, considering the harmful compounds that can be produced after hepatic biotransformation.Entities:
Keywords: Ames test; Azo dye; Biotransformation; Micronucleus Assay; Mutagenicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26247324 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol In Vitro ISSN: 0887-2333 Impact factor: 3.500