| Literature DB >> 26247009 |
Xinwang Wang1, Weibing Shi2, Timothy Rinehart3.
Abstract
Transcriptome analysis was conducted in two popular Lagerstroemia cultivars: "Natchez" (NAT), a white flower and powdery mildew resistant interspecific hybrid and "Carolina Beauty" (CAB), a red flower and powdery mildew susceptible L. indica cultivar. RNA-seq reads were generated from Erysiphe australiana infected leaves and de novo assembled. A total of 37,035 unigenes from 224,443 assembled contigs in both genotypes were identified. Approximately 85% of these unigenes have known function. Of them, 475 KEGG genes were found significantly different between the two genotypes. Five of the top ten differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (plant defense) and four in flavonoid biosynthesis pathway (antioxidant activities or flower coloration). Furthermore, 5 of the 12 assembled unigenes in benzoxazinoid biosynthesis and 7 of 11 in flavonoid biosynthesis showed higher transcript abundance in NAT. The relative abundance of transcripts for 16 candidate DEGs (9 from CAB and 7 from NAT) detected by qRT-PCR showed general agreement with the abundances of the assembled transcripts in NAT. This study provided the first transcriptome analyses in L. indica. The differential transcript abundance between two genotypes indicates that it is possible to identify candidate genes that are associated with the plant defenses or flower coloration.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26247009 PMCID: PMC4515301 DOI: 10.1155/2015/528395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Genomics ISSN: 2314-436X Impact factor: 2.326
Summary of sequencing data of two Lagerstroemia indica cultivars: powdery mildew susceptible (“Carolina Beauty,” CAB) and powdery mildew resistant (“Natchez,” NAT), resulting from Illumina deep sequencing.
| CAB | NAT | Combined | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total sequence bases | 1,765,922,760 | 1,874,976,180 | 3,640,898,940 |
| Total reads | 16,818,312 | 17,856,916 | 34,675,228 |
| Average length of raw read (bp) | 105 | 105 | |
| Number of contigs | 111,804 | 112,639 | 224,443 |
| Average length of contigs (bp) | 671 | 581 | 626 |
| Total length of all contigs (bp) | 64,344,103 | 64,421,335 | 128,765,438 |
| N50 contig size (bp) | 1110 | 1081 | |
| Minimum length of contig (bp) | 145 | 142 | |
| Maximum length of contig (bp) | 11,309 | 7,412 | |
| GC percentage (%) | 47.57 | 47.72 | |
| Number of unique genes | 23,654 | 23,387 | 37,035 |
| Average length of unigenes (bp) | 878 | 860 | 835 |
| Annotated transcripts (% of unigenes) | 20118 (85.05%) | 19898 (85.08%) |
Figure 1Length distribution of unigenes in the assembled transcriptomes of two Lagerstroemia indica cultivars: powdery mildew susceptible (Carolina Beauty, CAB) and powdery mildew resistant (Natchez, NAT).
Figure 2Distribution of active genes in two Lagerstroemia indica cultivars: powdery mildew susceptible (“Carolina Beauty,” CAB) and powdery mildew resistant (“Natchez,” NAT) transcriptomes. (a) KEGG database based gene annotation. (b) Top 20 active KEGG pathways based on the number of unigenes.
Figure 3Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified by different statistical methods (a) and global review of differentially expressed genes in powdery mildew resistant (red dot) and susceptible (black dot) genotypes in Lagerstroemia indica species (b).
Top 10 differentially expressed KEGG genes between powdery mildew susceptible (“Carolina Beauty,” CAB) and powdery mildew resistant (“Natchez,” NAT) crape myrtle genotypes.
| KEGG ID | KEGG pathway ID | Pathway | Definition | Fold change |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EdgeR | DESeq | Rankprod | |||||
| K13230 | ko00402 | Benzoxazinoid biosynthesis | 2,4,7-Trihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one-glucoside 7-O-methyltransferase [EC:2.1.1.241] | 67.7 | 0.00 | 6.89 | 0 |
| K05280 | ko00941 | Flavonoid biosynthesis | Flavonoid 3′-monooxygenase [EC:1.14.13.21] | 3.49 | 4.80 | 1.03 | 0.00068 |
| K00660 | ko00941 | Flavonoid biosynthesis | Chalcone synthase [EC:2.3.1.74] | 2.28 | 3.83 | 5.79 | 0.00472 |
| K00517 | 1.7 | 3.33 | 0.000124 | 0.0288 | |||
| K00487 | ko00941 | Flavonoid biosynthesis |
| 3.31 | 2.04 | 5.20 | 0.000766 |
| K11251 | ko05034 | Alcoholism | Histone H2A | 1.59 | 6.31 | 6.94 | 0.041 |
| K11254 | ko05035 | Alcoholism | Histone H4 | 1.57 | 5.60 | 6.81 | 0.0464 |
| K08081 | ko00960 | Tropane, piperidine, and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis | Tropine dehydrogenase [EC:1.1.1.206] | 7.37 | 0.00 | 4.63 | 8.10 |
| K00549 | ko00270 | Cysteine and methionine metabolism | 5-Methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate–homocysteine methyltransferase [EC:2.1.1.14] | 1.65 | 1.74 | 0.000147 | 0.0351 |
| K10775 | ko00360 | Phenylalanine metabolism | Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase [EC:4.3.1.24] | 1.99 | 1.18 | 0.00886 | 0.0133 |
| K00276 | ko00260; ko00350; ko00360; ko00410; ko00950; ko00960 | Primary-amine oxidase [EC:1.4.3.21] | 3.91 | 2.47 | 4.64 | 0.000429 | |
| K01583 | ko00330 | Arginine and proline metabolism | Arginine decarboxylase [EC:4.1.1.19] | 8.82 | 1.12 | 3.34 | 5.52 |
| K01904 | ko00130; ko00360; ko00940 | 4-Coumarate–CoA ligase [EC:6.2.1.12] | 2.04 | 3.35 | 1.23 | 0.00942 | |
| K03327 | Multidrug resistance protein, MATE family | 1.56 | 1.79 | 1.39 | 0.0493 | ||
| K01890 | ko00970 | Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase beta chain [EC:6.1.1.20] | 2.83 | 7.19 | 1.01 | 1.56 |
| K06568 | 1.66 | 1.27 | 1.10 | 0.0319 | |||
| K05279 | ko00944 | Flavonol 3-O-methyltransferase | Flavonol 3-O-methyltransferase [EC:2.1.1.76] | 2.33 | 1.59 | 9.41 | 0.00373 |
Figure 4Pathway enrichment based on the profile of combined unique gene expression.
Figure 5Genes encoding enzyme commission (ECs) in flavonoid biosynthesis pathway were upregulated (red) in the transcriptome of resistant crape myrtle genotype (“Natchez,” NAT) compared to susceptible crape myrtle genotype (“Carolina Beauty,” CAB) transcriptome.
Figure 6(a) Phylogenetic distance of genes encoding methyltransferases to produce DIMBOA-glucoside. (b) Comparison of transcripts abundance (reads per million, RPM) assembled unigenes encoding methyltransferases.
Figure 7(a) Phylogenetic distance of unigenes encoding flavonoid 3′-monooxygenase to produce flavonoids. (b) Comparison of transcripts abundance (reads per million, RPM) assembled unigenes encoding flavonoid 3′-monooxygenase.
Relative quantification and fold expression of differentially expressed genes in powdery mildew resistant “Natchez” (NAT) versus susceptible “Carolina Beauty” (CAB) cultivars.
| Primer | Query name | NAT cDNA Ct | CAB cDNA Ct | Fold diff. | Fold diff. | Fold diff. | Fold diff. | Fold diff. | Fold diff. | Mean fold |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| cab-rt1 | B.7344 | 32.18 | 30.94 | — |
| — |
| — |
| 2.61 |
| cab-rt2 | B.2282 | 30.19 | 29.92 | — |
| — |
| — |
| 1.33 |
| cab-rt3 | B.3011 | 31.50 | 33.31 | — |
| — |
| — |
| 0.32 |
| cab-rt5 | B.18652 | 29.02 | 26.48 | — |
| — |
| — |
| 6.43 |
| cab-rt6 | B.21408 | 35.94 | 37.44 | — |
| — |
| — |
| 0.39 |
| cab-rt7 | B.21856 | 35.16 | 33.60 | — |
| — |
| — |
| 3.26 |
| cab-rt8 | B.22624 | 33.80 | 28.64 | — |
| — |
| — |
| 28.48 |
| cab-rt9 | B.22625 | 29.36 | 26.84 | — |
| — |
| — |
| 6.34 |
| cab-rt10 | B.23059 | 32.30 | 34.69 | — |
| — |
| — |
| 0.21 |
| nat-rt6 | T.13188 | 32.75 | 37.73 |
| — |
| — |
| — | 0.12 |
| nat-rt8 | T.13192 | 28.34 | 29.43 |
| — |
| — |
| — | 2.52 |
| nat-rt9 | T.13486 | 32.08 | 29.40 |
| — |
| — |
| — | 0.12 |
| nat-rt11 | T.17520 | 37.91 | 28.78 |
| — |
| — |
| — | 1.07 |
| nat-rt13 | T.8775 | 28.14 | 27.46 |
| — |
| — |
| — | 0.75 |
| nat-rt14 | T.9193 | 29.82 | 31.05 |
| — |
| — |
| — | 2.84 |
| nat-rt15 | T.17643 | 30.33 | 28.44 |
| — |
| — |
| — | 0.32 |
Note. We calculated the fold increase in expression for the NAT primers by treating NAT as the treatment and housekeeping gene as the control and compared to CAB treatment (∗). For the CAB primers we used CAB as the treatment and housekeeping gene as the control and compared to NAT treatment (∗∗). Highlight in bold (cab-h1), italic (cab-h8), and bold italic (nat-h1) indicates that fold difference of expression was calculated based on individual housekeeping gene. Mean fold was calculated from three housekeeping genes.