| Literature DB >> 26246862 |
Armando López-Santos1, Santos Martínez-Santiago1.
Abstract
The aims of this study were to (1) find critical areas susceptible to the degradation of natural resources according to local erosion rates and aridity levels, which were used as environmental quality indicators, and (2) identify areas of risk associated with the presence of natural hazards according to three climate change scenarios defined for Mexico. The focus was the municipality of Lerdo, Durango (25.166° to 25.783° N and 103.333° to 103.983° W), which has dry temperate and very dry climates (BSohw and BWhw). From the Global Circulation Models, downscaling techniques for the dynamic modeling of environmental processes using climate data, historical information, and three regionalized climate change scenarios were applied to determine the impacts from laminar wind erosion rates (LWER) and aridity indices (AI). From the historic period to scenario A2 (ScA2, 2010-2039), regarding greenhouse gas emissions, the LWER was predicted to reach 147.2 t ha-1 year-1, representing a 0.5 m thickness over nearly 30 years and a change in the AI from 9.3 to 8.7. This trend represents an increase in drought for 70.8 % of the study area and could affect 90 % of the agricultural activities and approximately 80 % of the population living in the southeastern Lerdense territory.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptation; Downscaling; Drought; Dryland; Wind erosion
Year: 2014 PMID: 26246862 PMCID: PMC4519635 DOI: 10.1007/s11869-014-0286-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Air Qual Atmos Health ISSN: 1873-9318 Impact factor: 3.763
Fig. 1Geographical location and topographic features of Lerdo, Durango, Mexico
Fig. 2Integration of selected WS and geographical locations
CAUSO and CATEX indices used for modeling
| CATEX | TCPP | C-INEGI, 2007 | CAUSO | Category | Clavea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | 1 | Coarse | 0.70 | C1 | T |
| 1.75 | 2 | Medium | 0.20 | C2 | R |
| 1.85 | 3 | Fine | 0.15 | C3 | Mdm, Mdr, Ch, Vg |
| 0.87 | SPB | SPB | 0.30 | C4 | P, Vh |
| NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Cau, Ur, H2O |
TCPP textural class and physical phase, C-INEGI, 2007 textural class according to INEGI, 2007 (INEGI 2007a), SPB stony phase or burden, NA not applicable, T rainfed agriculture, R irrigated agriculture, Mdm microphyllous scrubland, Mdr rosette scrubland, Ch chaparral, Vg gallery vegetation, P grassland, Vh hydrophyllum vegetation, Cau riverbed, Ur urban area, H O water body
aCartographic clave used for vegetation maps from INEGI editions 1975 and 2009
HMAR, HMAT, and anomalies regionalized for Mexico for three future scenarios during 2010–2039
| Clave | WS name | Coordinates | MAR | Anomaly | MAT | Anomaly | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Hist | A2 | A1B | B1 | Hist | A2 | A1B | B1 | ||
| Dg | m | mm | % | °C | ||||||||
| 5006 | Torreón Jardín | −103.4 | 25.533 | 1,136 | 256.2 | −2.55 | −3.08 | −2.79 | 22.0 | 0.86 | 0.926 | 0.838 |
| 5027 | Presa Cuije | −103.3 | 25.7 | 1,116 | 194.0 | −3.32 | −3.08 | −2.79 | 21.9 | 0.86 | 0.926 | 0.838 |
| 5028 | Presa Guadalupe | −103.23 | 25.767 | 1,112 | 203.3 | −3.32 | −3.08 | −2.79 | 21.5 | 0.86 | 0.926 | 0.838 |
| 5029 | Presa La Flor | −103.35 | 25.083 | 1,276 | 280.3 | −2.55 | −2.87 | −2.94 | 20.9 | 0.856 | 0.929 | 0.836 |
| 10004 | Cañón Fernández | −103.75 | 25.283 | 1,360 | 320.4 | −3.98 | −3.94 | −3.69 | 22.1 | 0.867 | 0.935 | 0.835 |
| 10009 | Cd Lerdo (SMN) | −103.52 | 25.533 | 1,135 | 286.6 | −2.98 | −2.95 | −2.24 | 21 | 0.851 | 0.926 | 0.823 |
| 10045 | Mapimí (KM.29) | −103.85 | 25.817 | 1,325 | 320.1 | −2.98 | −2.95 | −2.24 | 19.3 | 0.851 | 0.926 | 0.823 |
| 10055 | Pedriceñas | −103.75 | 25.083 | 1,330 | 403.6 | −3.98 | −3.94 | −3.69 | 19.6 | 0.867 | 0.935 | 0.835 |
| 10108 | Cd Lerdo (DGE) | −103.37 | 25.5 | 1,139 | 270.1 | −2.55 | −2.87 | −2.94 | 21 | 0.856 | 0.929 | 0.836 |
| 10140 | La Cadena | −104.16 | 25.533 | 2,230 | 274.2 | −3.76 | −2.84 | −2.73 | 21.2 | 0.865 | 0.973 | 0.834 |
| 10049 | Nazas | −104.11 | 25.233 | 1,264 | 348.9 | −2.81 | −2.95 | −2.61 | 20.3 | 0.883 | 0.958 | 0.85 |
| 10085 | Tlahualilo | −103.48 | 26.168 | 1,096 | 266.4 | −1.64 | −2.12 | −2.74 | 20.6 | 0.861 | 0.92 | 0.827 |
| Mean | 1,293 | 285.3 | −3.04 | −3.06 | −2.85 | 20.95 | 0.861 | 0.934 | 0.834 | |||
| Stdev | 311 | 58.1 | 0.69 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.89 | 0.009 | 0.016 | 0.007 | |||
HMAR historic mean annual rain, HMAT historic mean annual temperature, WS weather station, Stdev standard deviation, Dg decimal degrees, x west longitude, y north latitude, z height, m meters
Impact analysis on MAR in the scenario A2
| Range | Variable | Impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMAR | PMAA2 | AC | RI | |
| mm | % | |||
| Low | 255 | 258 | 3 | 1.16 |
| High | 314 | 347 | 33 | 9.51 |
| Mean | 284 | 302 | 18 | 5.95 |
HMAR historic mean annual rainfall, MAR A2 mean annual rainfall under scenario A2, AC absolute change (HMAR − MARA2), RI relative impact
Fig. 3Spatial distribution of the MAR and impact of scenario A2
Impact analysis for the GROPE index as a consequence of MAR changes
| Range | Variable | Impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGROPE | GROPEA2 | AC | RI | |
| Index | % | |||
| Low | 26.9 | 26.6 | 0.3 | 1.11 |
| High | 40.2 | 46.1 | 5.9 | 14.67 |
| Mean | 33.6 | 36.3 | 2.7 | 8.03 |
HGROPE historic growing season, GROPE A2 growing season for scenario A2, AC absolute change (HGROPE − GROPEA2), RI relative impact (AC/HGROPE)
Fig. 4Spatial distribution of GROPE for the historical data and scenario A2
Fig. 5Spatial distribution of the CATEX index and relative importance
Fig. 6Changes in the CAUSO index for three categories of land use
Fig. 8Spatial distribution of the aridity index (AI) for the historical data (a) and scenario A2 (b) based on the analysis of the absolute change (c) and relative impact (d) for the three classes of aridity
Analysis of changes in the LWER between the historical data and scenario A2
| Range | Variable | Impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLWER | LWERA2 | AC | RI | |
| t ha−1 year−1 | % | |||
| Low | 17 | 16.8 | 0.2 | 1.17 |
| High | 147 | 147.2 | 0.2 | 0.14 |
| Mean | 82 | 82 | 0 | 0.00 |
HLWER historic laminar wind erosion rate, LWE A2 laminar wind erosion for Scenario A2, AC absolute change (HLWER − LWEA2), RI relative importance (AC/HEEL)
Fig. 7Spatial distributions of historic laminar wind erosion (HLWER) and LWER under ScA2
Estimated changes in the aridity index from historical conditions to Scenario A2
| WS-NWS | Coordinates | Variable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clave | Name |
|
| HIA | IAA2 | AC |
| Dg | Index | |||||
| 5006 | Torreón Jardín | −103.400 | 25.533 | 8.0 | 7.6 | 0.41 |
| 5027 | Presa Cuije | −103.300 | 25.700 | 6.1 | 5.7 | 0.36 |
| 5028 | Presa Guadalupe | −103.230 | 25.767 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 0.38 |
| 5029 | Presa La Flor | −103.350 | 25.083 | 9.1 | 8.6 | 0.47 |
| 10004 | Cañón de Fernández | −103.750 | 25.283 | 10.0 | 9.3 | 0.65 |
| 10009 | Cd. Lerdo (SMN) | −103.520 | 25.533 | 9.2 | 8.7 | 0.52 |
| 10045 | Mapimí (KM.29) | −103.850 | 25.817 | 10.9 | 10.3 | 0.62 |
| 10055 | Pedriceña | −103.750 | 25.083 | 13.6 | 12.7 | 0.91 |
| 10108 | Cd. Lerdo (DGE) | −103.370 | 25.500 | 8.7 | 8.3 | 0.45 |
| 10140 | La Cadena | −104.167 | 25.533 | 8.8 | 8.2 | 0.56 |
| 10049 | Nazas | −104.117 | 25.233 | 11.5 | 10.9 | 0.64 |
| 10085 | Tlahualilo | −103.483 | 26.168 | 8.7 | 8.3 | 0.38 |
| Mean | 9.3 | 8.7 | 0.53 | |||
| Stdev | 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.16 | |||
Dg decimal degrees, AC absolute change (HIA − IAA2), Stdev standard deviation
Fig. 9Dust storms that occurred at different times in rural and urban areas of the municipality of Lerdo