| Literature DB >> 26246613 |
Emma Fernández-Crespo1, Loredana Scalschi1, Eugenio Llorens1, Pilar García-Agustín1, Gemma Camañes2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: ABA; H2O2; NH4zzm321990+ nutrition; induced resistance; putrescine; systemic acquired acclimation.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26246613 PMCID: PMC4623687 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.Effect of different N treatments on the resistance of tomato plants to Pst. Four-week-old tomato plants grown with different NO3 – and NH4 + concentrations were inoculated by dipping them in a bacterial suspension of Pst at 5×105 cfu ml−1. At 72 hpi, the disease rating was scored by measuring the percentage of infected leaves in relation to the total number of analysed leaves (A) and by recounting of bacterial populations by plating in agar–KB medium (B). The photograph shows a representative picture of disease symptoms in the different N treatments. Data show the average of three independent experiments of a pool of 10 plants per experiment ±SE. Letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05; least-significant difference test). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Effect of NH4 + nutrition on growth, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic rate (AN)
| Treatments | Biomass (g DW) | Cholorophyll content (SPAD units) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.480±0.117 b | 37.573±0.578 b | 21.565±0.841 b |
| NH4 + | 0.345±0.031 a | 43.300±0.716 a | 13.543±0.663 a |
Fig. 2.PA content in control and N-NH4 + tomato plants following Pst infection. Four-week-old tomato plants were grown under control conditions or with 5mM NH4 +, and inoculated by dipping them in a bacterial suspension of Pst at 5×105 cfu ml−1. Leaves were collected at various time points, and ornithine (A) and Put (B) levels were determined in freeze-dried material by HPLC–MS. Data show the average of three independent experiments of a pool of 10 plants per experiment ±SE. Letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05; least-significant difference test).
Fig. 3.Influence of Put accumulation on NH4 +-IR against Pst. Plants were grown as described in Fig. 2 and, 1 week prior to inoculation, N-NH4 + plants were treated with inhibitor solution (containing DFMO and DFMA; NH4 ++Inh) and control plants were treated with 0.5mM Put 48h before infection (C+Put), and inoculated by dipping them in a bacterial suspension of Pst at 5×105 cfu ml−1. The disease rating was scored by measuring the percentage of infected leaves in relation to the total number of analysed leaves (A) and by recounting of bacterial populations by plating in agar–KB medium (B) at 72 hpi. The Put level in control, NH4 +, and NH4 ++Inh plants was analysed at 48 hpi (C). The photograph shows a representative picture of disease symptoms in control, NH4 +, NH4 ++Inh, and C+Put tomato leaves at 72 hpi (D). Data show the average of three independent experiments of a pool of 10 plants per experiment ±SE. Letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05; least-significant difference test). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 4.Effect of NH4 + nutrition on the oxidative burst upon Pst infection. Plants were grown and inoculated as described in Fig. 2. H2O2 accumulation was visualized by DAB staining. Quantification was performed by determining the number of brown pixels on digital photographs of leaves at 3 and 48 hpi (A). Representative photographs were taken of H2O2 accumulation in control and N-NH4 + plants in the absence of pathogens, as well as 48 hpi (B). Data show average values ±SE (n=20) of the relative number of brown or yellow pixels per photograph. H2O2 concentrations were quantified by xylenol orange analysis (C). Total RNA was isolated from leaves at 3 and 48 hpi and was converted into cDNA and subjected to a qRT-PCR analysis. The relative level of (D) rboh1 and (E) CuAO was analysed in the control and N-NH4 + plants. The results were normalized to the EF1α gene expression measured in the same samples. Letters indicate significant differences between treatments at each time point (P<0.05; least-significant difference test). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 5.Hormonal profile in control and the N-NH4 + tomato plants upon Pst infection. Plants were grown and inoculated as described in Fig. 2. Leaves were collected at different time points, and ABA (A), SA (B), OPDA (C), JA (D), and ferulic acid (E) levels were determined by HPLC–MS. The concentration of the hormones was determined in all samples by normalizing the chromatographic area for each compound with the fresh weight of the corresponding sample. Data show the average of three independent experiments of a pool of 20 plants per experiment ±SE. Letters indicate statistically significant differences at each time point (P<0.05; least-significant difference test).
Fig. 6.Gene expression profile of plant defence pathways in control and N-NH4 + tomato plants upon Pst infection. Plants were grown and inoculated as described in Fig. 2. The expression of genes representing key components of ABA (Asr1) (A), SA (PR1 and PR5) (B and C), JA (LoxD and JMT) (D and E), and ethylene (ACCOx) (F) signalling pathways were analysed in cDNA from leaves of control and N-NH4 + plants at 48 hpi. The results were normalized to the EF1α gene expression measured in the same samples. Data show the average of three independent experiments of a pool of 10 plants per experiment ±SE. Letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05; least-significant difference test).
Fig. 7.Influence of ABA, SA, and JA signalling pathways on NH4 +-IR against Pst. Four-week-old tomato mutants impaired in these signalling pathways were grown under control and NH4 + treatments and inoculated by dipping in a bacterial suspension of Pst. The disease rating was scored for wild-type tomato plants of Ailsa Craig (Ailsa), Moneymaker (MM), and Castlemart (Cast) and their respective ABA-impaired mutant flacca (A, B), SA-impaired mutant NahG (C, D), and JA-impaired mutant def1 (E, F) at 72 hpi. Data show the average of three independent experiments of a pool of 10 plants per experiment ±SE. Letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05; least-significant difference test).
Fig. 8.NH4 + treatment induces basal stomatal closure, and NH4 +-IR against Pst is independent of the COR toxin effect. Tomato plants were grown, treated, and inoculated as described in Fig. 2. Stomatal apertures were analysed ‘in situ’ in leaflets of control and N-NH4 + plants at 0, 1, and 3 hpi (A). Results are means ± SE (n>50 stomata). Representative photographs of basal stomatal closure induced by NH4 + treatment (B) were taken. Tomato plants were infected by dipping them in a bacterial suspension of Pst and the coronatine-less strain of Pst (CmaA COR–). The disease rating was scored by measuring the percentage of infected leaves (C) and by recounting of bacterial populations (D) at 72 hpi. Data show the average of three independent experiments of a pool of 10 plants per experiment ±SE. Letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05; least-significant difference test). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 9.Model of achievement of SAA induced by NH4 + nutrition. Tomato plants grown in NH4 + as a sole N source develop different responses to relieve the mild toxicity effect. These responses play an important role in achieving SAA and in the resistance against Pst. A common response against NH4 + nutrition is the accumulation of PAs to compensate for the lack of some cations other than NH4 +, besides serving as a sink for excess NH4 + to reduce the toxicity. Here, basal metabolic changes induced by NH4 + nutrition were observed, specifically Put, ABA, and ferulic acid accumulation. Another response against the mild toxic effect of NH4 + nutrition is ROS accumulation and, consequently, the modification of the redox cell state. This modification occurs by the basal induction of CuAO and rboh1 genes observed in N-NH4 + plants. Moreover, it was found that basal stomatal closure is probably produced by H2O2 derived from enhanced CuAO activity, induced by ABA-mediated NH4 + responses. The chloroplast receives the stress signal (mediated by ROS) and activates retrograde signalling pathways, recruiting downstream ABA signalling to regulate the expression of NH4 +-responsive genes in the nucleus and prevent NH4 + toxicity. The activation of this defensive pathway might induce the establishment of SAA in tomato plant leaves, allowing them to better withstand a subsequent Pst. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)