Literature DB >> 26246593

PETS-D: Impact on Diabetes Management Outcomes.

Susan Sullivan-Bolyai1, Sybil Crawford2, Carol Bova2, Mary Lee2, J B Quintos3, Kim Johnson2, Karen Cullen2, Terri Hamm3, Jean Bisordi3, Neesha Ramchandani1, Jason Fletcher1, Diane Quinn2, Carol Jaffarian2, Terri Lipman4, Gail Melkus1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of Parent Education Through Simulation-Diabetes (PETS-D; clinical trial registration NCT01517269) for parents of children <13 years old newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes with 3 parent education vignette sessions using human patient simulation (HPS) as compared with formal parent-nurse education sessions (vignette only) regarding diabetes knowledge, problem-solving skills, hypoglycemia fear, anxiety, and self-efficacy. DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects were randomized to the HPS parent diabetes education or the vignette-only arm. Using linear mixed modeling, we compared HPS and vignette-only groups at 2, 6, and 14 weeks. Effect modification of treatment by dichotomized child's age (<6 and ≥ 6 years old) and parent education (≤ high school and >high school) was also tested. All analyses were intent to treat and adjusted for baseline outcome level and clustering within site.
RESULTS: We recruited 191 parents (116 children). Mean baseline A1C was 12%. Overall treatment-related differences were modest. There was a statistically significant effect modification of HPS by child's age, with a larger HPS benefit among parents of younger children for several outcomes: A1C (8.16% vs 9.48% in control; P = .006), lower state anxiety (P = .0094), and higher fear of hypoglycemia (P = .03) for parents of children <6 years old in the HPS group.
CONCLUSIONS: Modest treatment-related differences may reflect ceiling/floor effects in many of the outcomes; we also compared HPS with another intervention rather than to usual education. Parents of younger children receiving the intervention may feel more comfortable with lower A1C levels because of management awareness gleaned from the HPS experience. Future research will include a retrospective case-control study of very young children.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26246593     DOI: 10.1177/0145721715598383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Educ        ISSN: 0145-7217            Impact factor:   2.140


  5 in total

1.  Intervention Fidelity: Monitoring Drift, Providing Feedback, and Assessing the Control Condition.

Authors:  Carol Bova; Carol Jaffarian; Sybil Crawford; Jose Bernardo Quintos; Mary Lee; Susan Sullivan-Bolyai
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  PETS-D (parents education through simulation-diabetes): Parents' qualitative results.

Authors:  Neesha Ramchandani; Laura L Maguire; Kailyn Stern; Jose B Quintos; Mary Lee; Susan Sullivan-Bolyai
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-03-19

3.  Psychological interventions for parents of children and adolescents with chronic illness.

Authors:  Emily Law; Emma Fisher; Christopher Eccleston; Tonya M Palermo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-18

4.  First use of Simulation in Therapeutic Patient Education (S-TPE) in adults with diabetes: a pilot study.

Authors:  Christelle Pennecot; Maxime Luu; Claire Marchand; Rémi Gagnayre; Nathalie Dechannes; Sabine Rudoni; Anne-Marie Hilaire; Aurore Demongeot; Delphine Capelle; Marc Bardou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Focusing on fidelity: narrative review and recommendations for improving intervention fidelity within trials of health behaviour change interventions.

Authors:  E Toomey; W Hardeman; N Hankonen; M Byrne; J McSharry; K Matvienko-Sikar; F Lorencatto
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2020-03-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.