Ta-Chen Huang1, Chih-Hung Hsu1, Chia-Chi Lin1, Yu-Kang Tu2. 1. Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University, College of Medicine, Taipei City. 2. Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan yukangtu@ntu.edu.tw.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves survival in patients with locoregional esophageal cancer. This study compares the efficacy of two common regimens, paclitaxel plus platinum and platinum plus 5-fluorouracil, based on overall survival. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing paclitaxel plus platinum-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or and platinum plus 5-fluorouracil-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with surgery alone. The outcome was the hazard ratios for death in the entire population and the two major histologic subgroups, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Ten clinical trials were included. Compared with surgery alone, the hazard ratios [95% credible interval (CrI)] in the entire, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma population were 0.63 (0.50-0.80), 0.50 (0.36-0.71) and 0.74 (0.54-1.01) for paclitaxel plus platinum, and 0.79 (0.68-0.92), 0.82 (0.67-1.01) and 0.81 (0.63-1.05) for platinum plus 5-fluorouracil, respectively. When paclitaxel plus platinum was compared with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil, the hazard ratios (95% CrI) in the entire, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma population were 0.80 (0.60-1.06), 0.61 (0.41-0.91) and 0.91 (0.61-1.36), respectively. The probability of paclitaxel plus platinum being ranked the optimal treatment for the entire, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma population was 94.2, 99.1 and 67.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel plus platinum regimen seemed to be a better treatment than platinum plus 5-fluorouracil regimen for locoregional esophageal cancer, especially for squamous cell carcinoma.
OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves survival in patients with locoregional esophageal cancer. This study compares the efficacy of two common regimens, paclitaxel plus platinum and platinum plus 5-fluorouracil, based on overall survival. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing paclitaxel plus platinum-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or and platinum plus 5-fluorouracil-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with surgery alone. The outcome was the hazard ratios for death in the entire population and the two major histologic subgroups, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Ten clinical trials were included. Compared with surgery alone, the hazard ratios [95% credible interval (CrI)] in the entire, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma population were 0.63 (0.50-0.80), 0.50 (0.36-0.71) and 0.74 (0.54-1.01) for paclitaxel plus platinum, and 0.79 (0.68-0.92), 0.82 (0.67-1.01) and 0.81 (0.63-1.05) for platinum plus 5-fluorouracil, respectively. When paclitaxel plus platinum was compared with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil, the hazard ratios (95% CrI) in the entire, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma population were 0.80 (0.60-1.06), 0.61 (0.41-0.91) and 0.91 (0.61-1.36), respectively. The probability of paclitaxel plus platinum being ranked the optimal treatment for the entire, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma population was 94.2, 99.1 and 67.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel plus platinum regimen seemed to be a better treatment than platinum plus 5-fluorouracil regimen for locoregional esophageal cancer, especially for squamous cell carcinoma.
Authors: Tao Wang; Jie Yu; Min Liu; Yanliang Chen; Caiyun Zhu; Lin Lu; Mingzhu Wang; Lingfeng Min; Xinxin Liu; Xizhi Zhang; Johannes A Gubat; Yong Chen Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 4.162
Authors: Karyn A Goodman; Fang-Shu Ou; Nathan C Hall; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Briant Fruth; Erin Twohy; Michael O Meyers; Daniel J Boffa; Kisha Mitchell; Wendy L Frankel; Donna Niedzwiecki; Anne Noonan; Yelena Y Janjigian; Paul J Thurmes; Alan P Venook; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Eileen M O'Reilly; David H Ilson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 50.717