Literature DB >> 26246366

Concordance of absolute and relative plasma volume changes and stability of Fcells in routine hemodialysis.

Daniel Schneditz1, Werner Ribitsch2, Gernot Schilcher2, Matthias Uhlmann1, Yossi Chait3, Vanessa Stadlbauer4.   

Abstract

Central hematocrit (H) measurements are currently used to track the degree of ultrafiltration-induced hemoconcentration with the aim to detect and prevent excessive intravascular fluid depletion during hemodialysis (HD). Failure to maintain hemodynamic stability is commonly attributed to the misinterpretation of H caused by an unaccountable increase in Fcells , the ratio of whole-body hematocrit to H. It was the aim to examine Fcells under everyday conditions in a group of stable HD patients. Absolute plasma volume (Vp ) and H were concomitantly measured during routine HD in the extracorporeal system in hourly intervals by noninvasive and continuous technology (CritLine-Instrument-III) and indocyanine green dye dilution to derive relative plasma volumes from Vp and H (RPVp , RPVH ), respectively, and to calculate Fcells . Thirteen patients were studied during two midweek treatments (n = 26). Both absolute Vp (P < 0.05) and relative plasma volumes RPVH (P < 0.001) decreased during HD. Vp at any time point was positively correlated to RPVH (r = 0.52). Moreover, relative plasma volumes RPVH and RPVp determined by independent techniques were identical and showed negligible bias (-0.2%) but considerable limits of agreement (-15.6% to +15.3%). Fcells was stable and in the range of 0.9 ± 0.05 throughout HD and not different from the value assumed at the beginning of HD. Although Fcells remains constant in patients on routine dialysis and relative plasma volumes (RPVH and RPVp ) determined by independent techniques are therefore comparable, the variability of experimental conditions during dialysis and the limited accuracy of absolute volume measurements using available technology continues to complicate the ultrafiltration control problem.
© 2015 International Society for Hemodialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultrafiltration; hematocrit; monitoring; plasma volume

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26246366      PMCID: PMC4937455          DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemodial Int        ISSN: 1492-7535            Impact factor:   1.812


  32 in total

Review 1.  Biofeedback systems architecture.

Authors:  F Paolini; A Bosetto
Journal:  Adv Ren Replace Ther       Date:  1999-07

2.  Nature and rate of vascular refilling during hemodialysis and ultrafiltration.

Authors:  D Schneditz; J Roob; M Oswald; H Pogglitsch; M Moser; T Kenner; U Binswanger
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  How does higher ultrafiltration within the conventional clinical range impact the volume status of hemodialysis patients?

Authors:  M Yashiro; T Kamata; H Segawa; T Murakami; Y Kadoya; E Muso
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  Sensitivity of Hematocrit to Osmotic Effects Induced by Changes in Dialysate Conductivity: Implications for Relative Blood Volume Measurement and Control.

Authors:  Daniel Schneditz; Gernot Schilcher; Werner Ribitsch; Edda Zierler; Andreas Jantscher
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Ultrafiltration profiling and measurement of relative blood volume as strategies to reduce hemodialysis-related side effects.

Authors:  J Donauer; D Kölblin; M Bek; A Krause; J Böhler
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Continuous on-line optical absorbance recording of blood volume changes during hemodialysis.

Authors:  E Mancini; A Santoro; M Spongano; F Paolini; M Rossi; P Zucchelli
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.094

7.  Attending rounds: A patient with intradialytic hypotension.

Authors:  Robert F Reilly
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Absolute blood volume and hepatosplanchnic blood flow measured by indocyanine green kinetics during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Daniel Schneditz; Bernd Haditsch; Andreas Jantscher; Werner Ribitsch; Peter Krisper
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

9.  Determination of blood volume using indocyanine green (cardio-green) dye.

Authors:  E C Bradley; J W Barr
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1968-09-01       Impact factor: 5.037

10.  Relative blood volume changes underestimate total blood volume changes during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Judith J Dasselaar; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge; Jan Pruim; Hugo Nijnuis; Anneke Wiersum; Paul E de Jong; Roel M Huisman; Casper F M Franssen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 8.237

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Intradialytic Hypotension: Mechanisms and Outcome.

Authors:  Benedict Sars; Frank M van der Sande; Jeroen P Kooman
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Increased Hepato-Splanchnic Vasoconstriction in Diabetics during Regular Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Werner Ribitsch; Daniel Schneditz; Casper F M Franssen; Gernot Schilcher; Vanessa Stadlbauer; Jörg H Horina; Alexander R Rosenkranz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Hemodialysis-induced changes in hematocrit, hemoglobin and total protein: Implications for relative blood volume monitoring.

Authors:  Leszek Pstras; Malgorzata Debowska; Alicja Wojcik-Zaluska; Wojciech Zaluska; Jacek Waniewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Relative blood volume changes during haemodialysis estimated from haemoconcentration markers.

Authors:  L Pstras; J Waniewski; A Wojcik-Zaluska; W Zaluska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.