Literature DB >> 26246312

Slowed ageing, welfare, and population problems.

Christopher Wareham1.   

Abstract

Biological studies have demonstrated that it is possible to slow the ageing process and extend lifespan in a wide variety of organisms, perhaps including humans. Making use of the findings of these studies, this article examines two problems concerning the effect of life extension on population size and welfare. The first--the problem of overpopulation--is that as a result of life extension too many people will co-exist at the same time, resulting in decreases in average welfare. The second--the problem of underpopulation--is that life extension will result in too few people existing across time, resulting in decreases in total welfare. I argue that overpopulation is highly unlikely to result from technologies that slow ageing. Moreover, I claim that the problem of underpopulation relies on claims about life extension that are false in the case of life extension by slowed ageing. The upshot of these arguments is that the population problems discussed provide scant reason to oppose life extension by slowed ageing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing; Anti-aging; Calorie restriction; Calorie restriction mimetics; Ethics; Life extension; Overpopulation; Population ethics; Slowed ageing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26246312     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-015-9337-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  26 in total

1.  General theory of mortality and aging.

Authors:  B L STREHLER; A S MILDVAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1960-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Demography. Has China outgrown the one-child policy?

Authors:  Mara Hvistendahl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Pursuing the longevity dividend: scientific goals for an aging world.

Authors:  S Jay Olshansky; Daniel Perry; Richard A Miller; Robert N Butler
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Who wants to live forever? Three arguments against extending the human lifespan.

Authors:  Martien A M Pijnenburg; Carlo Leget
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  The fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.

Authors:  Rebecca Bennett
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 6.  Life-extension: a biomedical goal? Scientific prospects, ethical concerns.

Authors:  Gaia Barazzetti; Massimo Reichlin
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Lifespan extension and the doctrine of double effect.

Authors:  Laura Capitaine; Katrien Devolder; Guido Pennings
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-06

Review 8.  Caloric restriction and aging: controversial issues.

Authors:  Edward J Masoro
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Does exceptional human longevity come with a high cost of infertility? Testing the evolutionary theories of aging.

Authors:  Natalia S Gavrilova; Leonid A Gavrilov; Victoria G Semyonova; Galina N Evdokushkina
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Human longevity at the cost of reproductive success.

Authors:  R G Westendorp; T B Kirkwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998 Dec 24-31       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.