Literature DB >> 2624628

A further exploration of the use of physical restraints in hospitalized patients.

L C Mion1, J D Frengley, C A Jakovcic, J A Marino.   

Abstract

Four hundred twenty-one consecutive patients admitted to an acute general medical ward and two acute rehabilitation medical wards were studied to compare the characteristics and outcomes of physically restrained patients and unrestrained patients. Restraints were used in 35 (13%) of the general medical patients and in 49 (34%) of the rehabilitation patients. The restrained general medical patients had higher mortality and morbidity rates than their unrestrained counterparts. Restrained patients had a higher prevalence of a psychiatric diagnosis, and major tranquilizers were used more than in their unrestrained counterparts in both settings. The general medical patients tended to have more than one type of restraint at a time, whereas the rehabilitation patients were restrained for longer proportions of their hospital stay. Thirty-three percent of the restrained patients whom we were able to interview expressed negative perceptions about the presence of the physical restraints. Moreover, it was found that the presence of cognitive and physical impairments were highly predictive of restraint use in both populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2624628     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb07280.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  10 in total

1.  Culture and the use of patient restraints.

Authors:  B B O'Connor
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1998 Sep-Dec

2.  Patient characteristics associated with the use of mechanical restraints.

Authors:  B Berland; T J Wachtel; D P Kiel; P S O'Sullivan; E Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Our hands are tied: legally induced moral tensions in health care delivery.

Authors:  M B Kapp
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Safety and efficacy of physical restraints for the elderly. Review of the evidence.

Authors:  C Frank; G Hodgetts; J Puxty
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Reducing the use of physical restraints in nursing homes: will it increase costs?

Authors:  C D Phillips; C Hawes; B E Fries
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Level of agitation of psychiatric patients presenting to an emergency department.

Authors:  Leslie S Zun; La Vonne A Downey
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008

7.  The nature and extent of the use of physical restraint and seclusion in psychiatric practice: Report of a survey.

Authors:  Udayan Khastgir; Anirudh Kala; Utpal Goswami; Satindra Kumar; Debakanta Behera
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Physical restraint use and older patients' length of hospital stay.

Authors:  Xue Bai; Timothy C Y Kwok; Isaac N Ip; Jean Woo; Maria Y P Chui; Florence K Y Ho
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2014-02-05

9.  Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marie Chieze; Samia Hurst; Stefan Kaiser; Othman Sentissi
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods.

Authors:  Danielle Laurin; Philippe Voyer; René Verreault; Pierre J Durand
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2004-10-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.