Literature DB >> 26246263

Database and Registry Research in Orthopaedic Surgery: Part I: Claims-Based Data.

Andrew J Pugely1, Christopher T Martin1, Jared Harwood2, Kevin L Ong3, Kevin J Bozic4, John J Callaghan1.   

Abstract

The use of large-scale national databases for observational research in orthopaedic surgery has grown substantially in the last decade, and the data sets can be grossly categorized as either administrative claims or clinical registries. Administrative claims data comprise the billing records associated with the delivery of health-care services. Orthopaedic researchers have used both government and private claims to describe temporal trends, geographic variation, disparities, complications, outcomes, and resource utilization associated with both musculoskeletal disease and treatment. Medicare claims comprise one of the most robust data sets used to perform orthopaedic research, with >45 million beneficiaries. The U.S. government, through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, often uses these data to drive changes in health policy. Private claims data used in orthopaedic research often comprise more heterogeneous patient demographic samples, but allow longitudinal analysis similar to that offered by Medicare claims. Discharge databases, such as the U.S. National Inpatient Sample, provide a wide national sampling of inpatient hospital stays from all payers and allow analysis of associated adverse events and resource utilization. Administrative claims data benefit from the high patient numbers obtained through a majority of hospitals. Using claims, it is possible to follow patients longitudinally throughout encounters irrespective of the location of the institution delivering health care. Some disadvantages include lack of precision of ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) coding schemes. Much of these data are expensive to purchase, complicated to organize, and labor-intensive to manipulate--often requiring trained specialists for analysis. Given the changing health-care environment, it is likely that databases will provide valuable information that has the potential to influence clinical practice improvement and health policy for years to come.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26246263     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  31 in total

1.  Smartphone Data Capture Efficiently Augments Dictation for Knee Arthroscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Joseph Featherall; Sameer R Oak; Gregory J Strnad; Lutul D Farrow; Morgan H Jones; Anthony A Miniaci; Richard D Parker; James T Rosneck; Paul M Saluan; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  What Is the Timing of General Health Adverse Events That Occur After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Daniel D Bohl; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Bryce A Basques; Brett R Levine; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Surgical research using national databases.

Authors:  Ram K Alluri; Hyuma Leland; Nathanael Heckmann
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

4.  Large clinical databases for the study of lung cancer: Making up for the failure of randomized trials.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  CORR Insights®: What Are the Complications, Survival, and Outcomes After Revision to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 80 Years?

Authors:  Aaron M Chamberlain
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Complication rates by surgeon type after open treatment of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Jeremy Truntzer; Kevin Mertz; Sara Eppler; Kevin Li; Michael Gardner; Robin Kamal
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-19

7.  Trends and Complications in Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release in Private Payer and Medicare Patient Populations.

Authors:  Sai K Devana; Andrew R Jensen; Kent T Yamaguchi; Anthony D'Oro; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Frank A Petrigliano; Casimir Dowd
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-01-11

8.  National Trends in the Diagnosis of CRPS after Open and Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release.

Authors:  Kevin Mertz; Jeremy Trunzter; Edward Wu; James Barnes; Sara L Eppler; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2019-02-27

9.  Reliability Of A Surgeon-Reported Morbidity And Mortality Database: A Comparison Of Short-Term Morbidity Between The Scoliosis Research Society And National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Databases.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Andrew J Pugely; Yubo Gao; Branko Skovrlj; Nathan J Lee; Samuel K Cho; Sergio Mendoza-Lattes
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

10.  Characterizing efficiency in the ambulatory surgery setting: An analysis of operating room time and cost savings in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Uchechi Iweala; Danny Lee; Ryan Lee; Jeffrey H Weinreb; Joseph R O'Brien; Warren Yu
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.