Literature DB >> 26246260

Factors Affecting Length of Stay, Readmission, and Revision After Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Population-Based Study.

Frederick A Matsen1, Ning Li2, Huizhong Gao2, Shaoqing Yuan2, Stacy M Russ1, Paul D Sampson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased length of hospital stay, hospital readmission, and revision surgery are adverse outcomes that increase the cost of elective orthopaedic procedures, such as shoulder arthroplasty. Awareness of the factors related to these adverse outcomes will help surgeons and medical centers design strategies for minimizing their occurrence and for managing their associated costs.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System on 17,311 primary shoulder arthroplasties performed from 1998 to 2011 to identify factors associated with extended lengths of hospitalization after surgery, readmission within ninety days, and surgical revision.
RESULTS: The factors associated with each of these three adverse outcomes were different. Longer lengths of hospital stay were associated with female sex, advanced patient age, Medicaid insurance, comorbidities, fracture as the diagnosis for arthroplasty, higher hospital case volumes, and lower surgeon case volumes. Readmission was associated with advanced patient age and medical comorbidities. The most common diagnoses for readmission within ninety days were fluid and electrolyte imbalance (28%), acute pulmonary problems (21%), cardiac arrhythmia (20%), heart failure (15%), acute myocardial infarction (10%), and urinary tract infection (10%). Revision was associated with younger patient age and osteoarthritis or traumatic arthritis. The most common diagnoses at the time of revision surgery were unspecified mechanical complications of the implant (60%), shoulder pain (18%), dislocation of the prosthetic joint (12%), component loosening (10%), a broken prosthesis (8%), a cuff tear (7%), and infection (7%).
CONCLUSIONS: A small number of easily identified characteristics (sex, age, race, insurance type, comorbidities, diagnosis, and provider case volumes) were significantly associated with longer lengths of stay, readmission, and revision surgery. Consideration of these factors and their effects may guide efforts to improve patient safety and to manage the costs associated with these adverse outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26246260     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

1.  Platform systems in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Joshua S Dines; David M Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Diabetes Disease Severity Was Not Associated with Risk of Deep Infection or Revision After Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew D McElvany; Priscilla H Chan; Heather A Prentice; Elizabeth W Paxton; Mark T Dillon; Ronald A Navarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comorbidity effects on shoulder arthroplasty costs analysis of a nationwide private payer insurance data set.

Authors:  Samuel Rosas; Karim G Sabeh; Leonard T Buller; Tsun Yee Law; Steven P Kalandiak; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Risk of Complications After THA Increases Among Patients Who Are Coinfected With HIV and Hepatitis C.

Authors:  Siddharth A Mahure; Joseph A Bosco; James D Slover; Jonathan Vigdorchik; Richard Iorio; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Perioperative Risk Adjustment for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Are Simple Clinically Driven Models Sufficient?

Authors:  David N Bernstein; Aakash Keswani; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Is there evidence that the outcomes of primary anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty are getting better?

Authors:  Jeremy S Somerson; Moni B Neradilek; Jason E Hsu; Benjamin C Service; Albert O Gee; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comparison of general versus isolated regional anesthesia in total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective propensity-matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  David Y Ding; Siddharth A Mahure; Brent Mollon; Steven D Shamah; Joseph D Zuckerman; Young W Kwon
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21

8.  Is Hepatitis C Infection Associated With a Higher Risk of Complications After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jourdan M Cancienne; Ian J Dempsey; Russell E Holzgrefe; Stephen F Brockmeier; Brian C Werner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Is Less Time in the Hospital Better?

Authors:  Kyle R Duchman; Chris A Anthony; Robert W Westermann; Andrew J Pugely; Yubo Gao; Carolyn M Hettrich
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

10.  What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.