Literature DB >> 26246121

Transferability of the electrospray ionization efficiency scale between different instruments.

Jaanus Liigand1, Anneli Kruve2, Piia Liigand2, Asko Laaniste2, Marion Girod3,4, Rodolphe Antoine3,5, Ivo Leito2.   

Abstract

For the first time, quantitative electrospray (ESI) ionization efficiencies (IE), expressed as logIE values, obtained on different mass-spectrometric setups (four mass analyzers and four ESI sources) are compared for 15 compounds of diverse properties. The general trends of change of IE with molecular structure are the same with all experimental setups. The obtained IE scales could be applied on different setups: there were no statistically significant changes in the order of ionization efficiency and the root mean of squared differences of the logIE values of compounds between the scales compiled on different instruments were found to be between 0.21 and 0.55 log units. The results show that orthogonal ESI source geometry gives better differentiating power and additional pneumatic assistance improves it even more. It is also shown that the ionization efficiency values are transferable between different mass-spectrometric setups by three anchoring points and a linear model. The root mean square error of logIE prediction ranged from 0.24 to 0.72 depending on the instrument. This work demonstrates for the first time the inter-instrument transferability of quantitative electrospray ionization efficiency data. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Different instruments; ESI; Ionization efficiency; Mass spectrometry

Year:  2015        PMID: 26246121     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-015-1219-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  23 in total

1.  Predicting electrospray response from chromatographic retention time.

Authors:  N B Cech; J R Krone; C G Enke
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Importance of gas-phase proton affinities in determining the electrospray ionization response for analytes and solvents.

Authors:  M H Amad; N B Cech; G S Jackson; C G Enke
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.982

3.  Relating electrospray ionization response to nonpolar character of small peptides.

Authors:  N B Cech; C G Enke
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Extension of the self-consistent spectrophotometric basicity scale in acetonitrile to a full span of 28 pKa units: unification of different basicity scales.

Authors:  Ivari Kaljurand; Agnes Kütt; Lilli Sooväli; Toomas Rodima; Vahur Mäemets; Ivo Leito; Ilmar A Koppel
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  Quantitative structure-ion intensity relationship strategy to the prediction of absolute levels without authentic standards.

Authors:  Liang Wu; Yuzheng Wu; Hanyuan Shen; Ping Gong; Lijuan Cao; Guangji Wang; Haiping Hao
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.558

6.  Enhanced nebulization efficiency of electrospray mass spectrometry: improved sensitivity and detection limit.

Authors:  Anneli Kruve; Ivo Leito; Koit Herodes; Asko Laaniste; Rünno Lõhmus
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Hydrophilic interaction chromatography versus reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry: effect of electrospray ionization source geometry on sensitivity.

Authors:  Aurélie Periat; Isabelle Kohler; Aurélie Bugey; Stefan Bieri; François Versace; Christian Staub; Davy Guillarme
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.759

8.  Electrospray ionization efficiency scale of organic compounds.

Authors:  Merit Oss; Anneli Kruve; Koit Herodes; Ivo Leito
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Effect of polar protic and polar aprotic solvents on negative-ion electrospray ionization and chromatographic separation of small acidic molecules.

Authors:  Brian A Huffman; Michael L Poltash; Christine A Hughey
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Towards the electrospray ionization mass spectrometry ionization efficiency scale of organic compounds.

Authors:  Ivo Leito; Koit Herodes; Merit Huopolainen; Kristina Virro; Allan Künnapas; Anneli Kruve; Risto Tanner
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessing the Interplay between the Physicochemical Parameters of Ion-Pairing Reagents and the Analyte Sequence on the Electrospray Desorption Process for Oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Babak Basiri; Mandi M Murph; Michael G Bartlett
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Towards Unbiased Evaluation of Ionization Performance in LC-HRMS Metabolomics Method Development.

Authors:  Carsten Jaeger; Jan Lisec
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-05-10

3.  Applications of Machine Learning to In Silico Quantification of Chemicals without Analytical Standards.

Authors:  Dimitri Panagopoulos Abrahamsson; June-Soo Park; Randolph R Singh; Marina Sirota; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  New Approach Combining Molecular Fingerprints and Machine Learning to Estimate Relative Ionization Efficiency in Electrospray Ionization.

Authors:  Alfred W Mayhew; David O Topping; Jacqueline F Hamilton
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-04-14

5.  Machine Learning for Absolute Quantification of Unidentified Compounds in Non-Targeted LC/HRMS.

Authors:  Emma Palm; Anneli Kruve
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Estimation of the concentrations of hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyls in human serum using ionization efficiency prediction for electrospray.

Authors:  Sara Khabazbashi; Josefin Engelhardt; Claudia Möckel; Jana Weiss; Anneli Kruve
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.478

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.