Literature DB >> 26245969

Synaptic Basis for Differential Orientation Selectivity between Complex and Simple Cells in Mouse Visual Cortex.

Ya-tang Li1, Bao-hua Liu2, Xiao-lin Chou1, Li I Zhang3, Huizhong W Tao4.   

Abstract

In the primary visual cortex (V1), orientation-selective neurons can be categorized into simple and complex cells primarily based on their receptive field (RF) structures. In mouse V1, although previous studies have examined the excitatory/inhibitory interplay underlying orientation selectivity (OS) of simple cells, the synaptic bases for that of complex cells have remained obscure. Here, by combining in vivo loose-patch and whole-cell recordings, we found that complex cells, identified by their overlapping on/off subfields, had significantly weaker OS than simple cells at both spiking and subthreshold membrane potential response levels. Voltage-clamp recordings further revealed that although excitatory inputs to complex and simple cells exhibited a similar degree of OS, inhibition in complex cells was more narrowly tuned than excitation, whereas in simple cells inhibition was more broadly tuned than excitation. The differential inhibitory tuning can primarily account for the difference in OS between complex and simple cells. Interestingly, the differential synaptic tuning correlated well with the spatial organization of synaptic input: the inhibitory visual RF in complex cells was more elongated in shape than its excitatory counterpart and also was more elongated than that in simple cells. Together, our results demonstrate that OS of complex and simple cells is differentially shaped by cortical inhibition based on its orientation tuning profile relative to excitation, which is contributed at least partially by the spatial organization of RFs of presynaptic inhibitory neurons. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Simple and complex cells, two classes of principal neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1), are generally thought to be equally selective for orientation. In mouse V1, we report that complex cells, identified by their overlapping on/off subfields, has significantly weaker orientation selectivity (OS) than simple cells. This can be primarily attributed to the differential tuning selectivity of inhibitory synaptic input: inhibition in complex cells is more narrowly tuned than excitation, whereas in simple cells inhibition is more broadly tuned than excitation. In addition, there is a good correlation between inhibitory tuning selectivity and the spatial organization of inhibitory inputs. These complex and simple cells with differential degree of OS may provide functionally distinct signals to different downstream targets.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3511081-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  excitation-inhibition balance; in vivo whole-cell recording; orientation tuning; receptive field; synaptic input

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26245969      PMCID: PMC4524977          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5246-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  61 in total

1.  Membrane potential and firing rate in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  M Carandini; D Ferster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Prediction of orientation selectivity from receptive field architecture in simple cells of cat visual cortex.

Authors:  I Lampl; J S Anderson; D C Gillespie; D Ferster
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Spatio-temporal subthreshold receptive fields in the vibrissa representation of rat primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  C I Moore; S B Nelson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  C D Gilbert
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  A feedforward inhibitory circuit mediates lateral refinement of sensory representation in upper layer 2/3 of mouse primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ling-yun Li; Xu-ying Ji; Feixue Liang; Ya-tang Li; Zhongju Xiao; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Quantitative studies of the discharge fields of single cells in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  P Heggelund
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance.

Authors:  P H Schiller; B L Finlay; S F Volman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Broadening of inhibitory tuning underlies contrast-dependent sharpening of orientation selectivity in mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Ya-tang Li; Wen-pei Ma; Ling-yun Li; Leena A Ibrahim; Sheng-zhi Wang; Huizhong Whit Tao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Differential connectivity and response dynamics of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in visual cortex.

Authors:  Sonja B Hofer; Ho Ko; Bruno Pichler; Joshua Vogelstein; Hana Ros; Hongkui Zeng; Ed Lein; Nicholas A Lesica; Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Multiple distinct subtypes of GABAergic neurons in mouse visual cortex identified by triple immunostaining.

Authors:  Yuri Gonchar; Quanxin Wang; Andreas Burkhalter
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.856

View more
  7 in total

1.  Spatial Asymmetry and Short-Term Suppression Underlie Direction Selectivity of Synaptic Excitation in the Mouse Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Ya-Tang Li; Qi Fang; Li I Zhang; Huizhong Whit Tao
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Cross-Modality Sharpening of Visual Cortical Processing through Layer-1-Mediated Inhibition and Disinhibition.

Authors:  Leena A Ibrahim; Lukas Mesik; Xu-Ying Ji; Qi Fang; Hai-Fu Li; Ya-Tang Li; Brian Zingg; Li I Zhang; Huizhong Whit Tao
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Mechanisms for Cognitive Impairment in Epilepsy: Moving Beyond Seizures.

Authors:  Mohamed R Khalife; Rod C Scott; Amanda E Hernan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Synaptic Mechanisms of Feature Coding in the Visual Cortex of Awake Mice.

Authors:  Hillel Adesnik
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Balanced Enhancements of Synaptic Excitation and Inhibition Underlie Developmental Maturation of Receptive Fields in the Mouse Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Qi Fang; Ya-Tang Li; Bo Peng; Zhong Li; Li I Zhang; Huizhong W Tao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Push-Pull Receptive Field Organization and Synaptic Depression: Mechanisms for Reliably Encoding Naturalistic Stimuli in V1.

Authors:  Jens Kremkow; Laurent U Perrinet; Cyril Monier; Jose-Manuel Alonso; Ad Aertsen; Yves Frégnac; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  The association of self-reported physical activity on human sensory long-term potentiation.

Authors:  Damien Moore; Paul D Loprinzi
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.