| Literature DB >> 26245863 |
Eleni P Karagianni1, Evanthia Kontomina1, Britton Davis2, Barbara Kotseli1, Theodora Tsirka1, Vasiliki Garefalaki1, Edith Sim3, Anthony E Glenn2, Sotiria Boukouvala1.
Abstract
Plant-pathogenic fungi and their hosts engage in chemical warfare, attacking each other with toxic products of secondary metabolism and defending themselves via an arsenal of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes. One such enzyme is homologous toEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26245863 PMCID: PMC4542470 DOI: 10.1038/srep12900
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Description of characterized NAT loci.
| Species (strain) | Taxon mnemonic | Taxon ID | Gene symbol | ORF (bp) | Protein (aa) | Exon span | Number of introns | Predicted locus tag | Nucleotide ID | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIBM7 | 334819 | 1038 | 345 | 1 (1–1038) | 0 | FVEG_12636 | EU552489, FN687904 | |||
| 957 | 318 | 1 (1–957) | 0 | FVEG_03961 | FN687889, FN687905 | |||||
| 978 | 325 | 1 (1–978) | 0 | FVEG_12062 | FN687890, FN687906 | |||||
| Transcribed pseudogene | 1 (1–298) 2 (461–1033) | 1 | FVEG_07425 | FN687891, LN829129 | ||||||
| GIBZE | 229533 | 1032 | 343 | 1 (1–1032) | 0 | FGSG_00080 | FN687882, FN687897 | |||
| 957 | 318 | 1 (1–371) 2 (430–1015) | 1 | FGSG_09400 | FN687883, FN687898 | |||||
| 960 | 319 | 1 (1–960) | 0 | FGSG_07888 | FN687884, FN687899 | |||||
| FUSO4 | 426428 | 1053 | 350 | 1 (1–1053) | 0 | FOXG_15318 | FN687885, FN687900 | |||
| 957 | 318 | 1 (1–371) 2 (423–1008) | 1 | FOXG_06095 | FN687886, FN687901 | |||||
| 999 | 332 | 1 (1–999) | 0 | FOXG_03795 | FN687887, FN687902 | |||||
| 963 | 320 | 1 (1–365) 2 (548–1145) | 1 | FOXG_04301 | FN687888, FN687903 | |||||
| ASPFN | 332952 | Elusive | Elusive | Elusive | Elusive | AFL2G_05055 | − | |||
| 981 | 326 | 1 (1–426) 2 (482–528) 3 (588–1095) | 2 | AFL2G_01915 | FN687893, FN687907 | |||||
| 957 | 318 | 1 (1–395) 2 (449–1010) | 1 | AFL2G_11316 | FN687894, FN687908 | |||||
| Transcribed pseudogene | 1 (1–91) 2 (143–692) | 1 | AFL2G_03311 | FN687895, FN687909 | ||||||
| EMENI | 227321 | 960 | 319 | 1 (1–407) 2 (463–510) 3 (568–1072) | 2 | ANID_10723 | FN687881, FN687896 | |||
1The taxon mnemonics and ID numbers are from the UniProt Taxonomy database (http://www.uniprot.org/taxonomy/). They correspond to sequenced strains of Fusarium verticillioides (teleomorph Gibberella moniliformis), Fusarium graminearum (teleomorph Gibberella zeae), Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus nidulans (teleomorph Emericella nidulans). According to current consensus nomenclature guidelines (Supplementary Methods and http://nat.mbg.duth.gr/), taxon mnemonics are attached to the symbols of NAT genes to identify their specific organism of origin.
2The sequences of open reading frames (ORF) in base pairs (bp), as well as of deduced proteins in amino acids (aa), were determined via alignment of amplification products generated from genomic DNA and cDNA.
3The locus tags represent annotations by the Broad Institute (http://www.broadinstitute.org/science/projects/fungal-genome-initiative/gene-finding-methods). F. verticillioides FVEG_07425 and A. flavus AFL2G_03311 tag genomic loci with sequences overlapping, but not coinciding, with the NAT sequences characterized experimentally in the present study.
4Two Nucleotide IDs were assigned to each fungal NAT, the first for the genomic and the second for the transcribed sequence of each locus.
5Annotation remains elusive for the NAT1 locus of A. flavus, as specific amplification from cDNA of the fungus has not been possible. The NAT4 loci of F. verticillioides and A. flavus appeared as transcribing pseudogenes with hypothetical ORFs that are disrupted by nonsense mutations.
Figure 1Activity of fungal NAT enzymes with different acyl-coenzyme A compounds.
Overview of the acyl-CoA selectivity pattern observed for the recombinant NAT isoenzymes of F. verticillioides (G. moniliformis-GIBM7), F. graminearum (G. zeae-GIBZE), F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (FUSO4), A. flavus (ASPFN) and A. nidulans (E. nidulans-EMENI). Functional homologues are grouped together within coloured boxes labelled I-III. Each enzyme was assayed against a series of acyl-CoA compounds, used as acyl-group donors in reactions with 5-aminosalicylate as acceptor substrate. The results for each set of assays are presented in Supplementary Fig. S3.
Figure 2Effect of acyl-coenzyme A compounds on the Tm of fungal NAT proteins.
Overview of Tm values determined by differential scanning fluorimetry for recombinant NAT isoenzymes of F. verticillioides (G. moniliformis-GIBM7), F. graminearum (G. zeae-GIBZE), F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (FUSO4) and A. flavus (ASPFN), in the absence or presence of various acyl-CoAs. Two replicate experiments were performed, generating overlapping curves for which the average Tm (± standard deviation) is shown. The results for each set of experiments are presented in Supplementary Fig. S4.
Figure 3Activity of fungal NAT enzymes with different acceptor substrates.
Overview of the acceptor substrate selectivity pattern observed for group I and II isoenzymes of F. verticillioides (G. moniliformis-GIBM7), F. graminearum (G. zeae-GIBZE), F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (FUSO4), A. flavus (ASPFN) and A. nidulans (E. nidulans-EMENI). Recombinant NAT proteins were assayed with selective acyl-CoAs against a panel of arylamine and arylhydrazine substrates, and the results for each set of assays are presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. The full chemical names of compounds are: 2-aminophenol (2AP), 4-aminoveratrole (AMV), 4-anisidine (ANS), 4-chloroaniline (CLA), 3,4-dichloroaniline (3,4DCA), 4-phenoxyaniline (POA), hydralazine (HDZ), 4-aminosalicylate (4AS), 4-aminobenzoate (PABA), isoniazid (INH), procainamide (PA) and sulphamethazine (SMZ).
Figure 4NAT enzymatic activities in fungal cell extracts upon xenobiotic exposure.
Erlich’s reagent was used to measure NAT activity in fungal soluble extracts, following enzyme assays with 3,4-dichloroaniline (3,4DCA) and either acetyl- or malonyl-CoA. The graphs show comparison of NAT enzymatic activities measured in cell extracts from cultures challenged for 2 h with xenobiotics (mixture of 2-benzoxazolinone and 3,4DCA, each at 25 μg/ml), relative to extracts prepared from cultures grown in standard medium. Control assays, without cell extract, are also shown. Each data point is the average value of three replicates ± standard deviation. Results are shown for assays performed with cell extracts from F. verticillioides (G. moniliformis) strain FGSC 7600 (a), F. graminearum (G. zeae) strain PH-1 (b), F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici strain FOL 4287 (c) and A. flavus strain NRRL 3357 (d). The effects of xenobiotics on NAT enzymatic activity measured with malonyl-CoA in cell extracts from F. verticillioides strains FGSC 7600, MRC 826 and JFL A00999 are also compared (e).
Figure 5Fungal tolerance of 2-benzoxazolinone.
F. verticillioides (G. moniliformis) strain FGSC 7600 (a), F. graminearum (G. zeae) strain PH-1 (b), F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici strain FOL 4287 (c), A. flavus strain NRRL 3357 (d) and A. nidulans (E. nidulans) strain FGSC A4 (e) were grown on standard agar medium supplemented with up to 1000 μg/ml of 2-benzoxazolinone. Cultures are shown after 5 days of incubation.