| Literature DB >> 26245514 |
Renato M Ramos1,2, Ronaldo C da Costa3, Andre L A Oliveira4, Manoj K Kodigudla5, Vijay K Goel6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies in humans have reported that the dimensions of the intervertebral foramina change significantly with movement of the spine. Cervical spondylomyelopathy (CSM) in dogs is characterized by dynamic and static compressions of the neural components, leading to variable degrees of neurologic deficits and neck pain. Studies suggest that intervertebral foraminal stenosis has implications in the pathogenesis of CSM. The dimensions of the cervical intervertebral foramina may significantly change during neck movements. This could have implication in the pathogenesis of CSM and other diseases associated with radiculopathy such as intervertebral disc disease. The purpose of this study was to quantify the morphological changes in the intervertebral foramina of dogs during flexion, extension, traction, and compression of the canine cervical vertebral column. All vertebral columns were examined with magnetic resonance imaging prior to biomechanic testing. Eight normal vertebral columns were placed in Group 1 and eight vertebral columns with intervertebral disc degeneration or/and protrusion were assigned to Group 2. Molds of the left and right intervertebral foramina from C4-5, C5-6 and C6-7 were taken during all positions and loading modes. Molds were frozen and vertical (height) and horizontal (width) dimensions of the foramina were measured. Comparisons were made between neutral to flexion and extension, flexion to extension, and traction to compression in neutral position.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26245514 PMCID: PMC4545818 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-015-0508-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Mean foraminal width (mm) of the cervical foramina (C4-5, C5-6, and C6-C7), of dogs divided according to movement and load
| Movement | Load | Width (mma) | 95 % Confidence Intervala (CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral | None | 11.12 | 10.61 − 11.62 |
| Neutral | Compression | 10.72 | 10.21 − 11.23 |
| Neutral | Traction | 11.15 | 10.64 − 11.66 |
| Extension | None | 9.86 | 9.35 − 10.36 |
| Flexion | None | 11.50 | 11.00 − 12.01 |
aForaminal width and CI in millimeters (mm)
Fig. 1Graph representation of the foraminal width and height changes in neutral, compression, traction, flexion and extension movements. Data represents combined data from all 3 levels (C4-5, C5-6, and C6-7) and all dogs from both groups. Data shown as bar graphs with standard error in millimeters (mm)
Mean foraminal height (mm) of the cervical foramina (C4-5, C5-6, and C6-C7), of dogs divided according to movement and load
| Movement | Load | Height (mm)a | 95 % Confidence. Intervala (CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral | None | 4.31 | 4.05 − 4.57 |
| Neutral | Compression | 4.14 | 3.89 − 4.4 |
| Neutral | Traction | 4.46 | 4.20 − 4.72 |
| Extension | None | 3.57 | 3.31 − 3.83 |
| Flexion | None | 4.79 | 4.53 − 5.05 |
aForaminal height and CI in millimeters (mm)
Comparison of the results of measurement of height and width of the cervical foramina (C4-5, C5-6, and C6-C7)
| Comparisons | Differencea (mm) | 95 % Confidence. Intervala (CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Height: Neutral/Compression vs. Neutral/None | −0.17 | −0.26 − −0.07 | 0.004 |
| Height: Neutral/Traction vs. Neutral/None | 0.15 | 0.05 − 0.24 | 0.011 |
| Height: Extension/None vs. Neutral/None | −0.74 | −0.84 − −0.64 | <0.001 |
| Height: Flexion/None vs. Neutral/None | 0.48 | 0.38 − 0.58 | <0.001 |
| Height: Flexion/None vs. Extension/None | 1.22 | 1.12 − 1.31 | <0.001 |
| Width: Neutral/Compression vs. Neutral/None | −0.40 | −0.64 − −0.16 | 0.008 |
| Width: Neutral/Traction vs. Neutral/None | 0.03 | −0.21 − 0.27 | >0.99 |
| Width : Extension/None vs. Neutral/None | −1.26 | −1.5 − −1.02 | <0.001 |
| Width: Flexion/None vs. Neutral/None | 0.39 | 0.15 − 0.63 | 0.001 |
| Width: Flexion/None vs. Extension/None | 1.65 | 1.41 − 1.89 | <0.001 |
aDifference and CI in millimeters (mm)
b p-values adjusted by the Holm’s procedure to conserve the overall type I error at 0.05
Magnetic resonance changes identified on the 8 vertebral columns of group 2 dogs (dogs with degenerative vertebral changes)
| Column | Intervertebral level C4–C5 | Intervertebral level C5 – C6 | Intervertebral level C6 – C7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | IVa disc degeneration | IV disc degeneration and dorsal disc protrusion |
| 2 | IV dorsal disc protrusion | IV disc degeneration and dorsal disc protrusion | - |
| 3 | - | - | IV disc degeneration and dorsal disc protrusion |
| 4 | - | - | IV disc degeneration and dorsal disc protrusion |
| 5 | - | - | IV disc degeneration and dorsal disc protrusion |
| 6 | - | - | IV disc degeneration and dorsal disc protrusion |
| 7 | - | - | IV disc degeneration and dorsal disc protrusion |
| 8 | - | IV disc degeneration | - |
aIV = intervertebral
Fig. 2Reference points to measure the dimensions of the cervical vertebral foramina of dogs. a, Measurement of foraminal height at C4-5, C5-6 and C6-7. b, Measurement of foraminal width at C4-5, C5-6 and C6-7