| Literature DB >> 26244510 |
Lixin Na1, Tianshu Han1, Wei Zhang1, Xiaoyan Wu1, Guanqiong Na1, Shanshan Du1, Ying Li1, Changhao Sun1.
Abstract
The evidence about the effect of dietary patterns on blood cholesterol from cohort studies was very scarce. The study was to identify the association of dietary patterns with lipid profile, especially cholesterol, in a cohort in north China. Using a 1-year food frequency questionnaire, we assessed the dietary intake of 4515 adults from the Harbin People's Health Study in 2008, aged 20-74 years. Principle component analysis was used to identify dietary patterns. The follow-up was completed in 2012. Fasting blood samples were collected for the determination of blood lipid concentrations. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of dietary patterns with the incidence of hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and low-HDL cholesterolemia. Five dietary patterns were identified ("staple food", "vegetable, fruit and milk", "potato, soybean and egg", "snack", and "meat"). The relative risk (RR) between the extreme tertiles of the snack dietary pattern scores was 1.72 (95% CI = 1.14, 2.59, P = 0.004) for hypercholesterolemia, 1.39 (1.13, 1.75, P = 0.036) for hypertriglyceridemia, after adjustment for age, sex, education, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, energy intake, exercise and baseline lipid concentrations. There was a significant positive association between the snack dietary pattern scores and fasting serum total cholesterol (SRC (standardized regression coefficient) = 0.262, P = 0.025), LDL-c (SRC = 0.324, P = 0.002) and triglycerides (SRC = 0.253, P = 0.035), after adjustment for the multiple variables above. Moreover, the adjusted RR of hypertriglyceridemia between the extreme tertiles was 0.73 (0.56, 0.94, P = 0.025) for the vegetable, fruit and milk dietary pattern, and 1.86 (1.33, 2.41, P = 0.005) for the meat dietary pattern. The snack dietary pattern was a newly emerged dietary pattern in northern Chinese adults. It appears conceivable that the risk of hypercholesterolemia can be reduced by changing the snack dietary pattern.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26244510 PMCID: PMC4526671 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Food groups and food items from the FFQ in the study.
| Food groups | Food items |
|---|---|
| Rice | Rice, foxtail millet and maize |
| Wheaten food | Noodle, steamed twisted roll and steamed bread, pancake, and bread |
| Potatoes and its products | Potato, sweet potato and vermicelli |
| Soybeans and its products | Tofu, dried bean curd and soybean milk |
| Vegetables | Mooli, garden radish, carrot, asparagus beans, soybean sprouts, sprouts of mung bean, eggplant, tomato, chili green, pimento, white gourd, cucumber, pumpkin, cocozelle, garlic bolt, garlic sprout, allium fistulosum, onions, Chinese chives, Chinese cabbage, sauerkraut, rape, flowering chinese cabbage, cabbage, red cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli, cabbage mustard, spinach, celery, leaf lettuce, coriander, crowndaisy chrysanthemum, baby Chinese cabbage, lettuce, mushroom, shii-take, black fungus, sea-tangle |
| Fruits | Apple, pear, peach, jujube, winter jujube, green grape, red grape, pomegranate, persimmon, strawberry, actinidia chinensis, orange, citrus, pomelo, pineapple, litchi, mango, banana, papaya, pitaya, durian, watermelon, Hami melon, melon, mangosteen |
| Livestock and its products | Pork, beef, mutton and offals (liver and intestine) |
| Poultry and its products | Chicken, duck, goose and offals |
| Milk | Cow's milk, yogurt and milk powder |
| Eggs | Egg |
| Seafood | Carp, crucian, hairtail, yellow croaker and shrimp |
| Snacks | Sugar-sweetened preserved fruits, biscuit, fried chips, chocolate, other sweets |
| Beverages | Sugar-sweetened drink, including fruit drink and fizzy drink |
| Icecream | Icecream |
Fig 1The flow chart of the participants.
Description of demographic and biochemical characteristics of the incident cases of hypercholesterolemia and the control subjects at baseline.
Data are means (SD) or n (%). Differences in categorical variables between the hypercholesterolemia and control groups in each study were analyzed by χ2 test. The mean levels of continuous variables between the 2 groups were tested by the independent-samples t test.
| Characteristics | Hypercholesterolemia (n = 175) | Control (n = 3179) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Male (%) | 40 (22.9) | 989 (31.1) | <0.001 |
| Age (years) | 54.2 (8.02) | 50.2 (10.1) | 0.014 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.7 (3.43) | 24.9 (3.40) | 0.605 |
| Education (%) | <0.001 | ||
| No formal education | 2 (1.14) | 49 (1.54) | |
| Elementary school | 4 (2.29) | 172 (5.41) | |
| Middle school | 66 (37.7) | 1017 (32.0) | |
| High school/secondary technical school | 56 (32.0) | 1084 (34.1) | |
| Technical school/college | 47 (26.9) | 833 (26.2) | |
| Postgraduate degree or above | 0 (0.00) | 24 (0.75) | |
| Lifestyle factors (%) | |||
| Current smoker | 33 (18.9) | 471 (14.8) | <0.001 |
| Current drinker | 52 (29.7) | 937 (29.5) | 0.391 |
| Regular exercise | 70 (40.0) | 1539 (48.4) | <0.001 |
| Blood lipids level | |||
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.96 (1.02) | 4.84 (0.95) | <0.001 |
| LDL-c (mmol/l) | 2.89 (1.05) | 2.76 (0.92) | <0.001 |
| HDL-c (mmol/l) | 1.23 (0.35) | 1.25 (0.31) | 0.642 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 1.88 (1.67) | 1.78 (1.42) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index.
Factor loading for 5 food patterns for the participants in the study.
Factor loading was obtained from the principal component analysis. Factor loadings ≥ 0.30 (30) are listed in the table.
| Food groups | Rotated factor loading | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staple food pattern | Vegetable, fruit and milk pattern | Potato, soybean and egg pattern | Snack pattern | Meat pattern | |
| Rice | 0.79 | -0.34 | |||
| Wheaten food | 0.88 | ||||
| Potatoes and its products | 0.60 | -0.37 | |||
| Soybeans and its products | 0.55 | ||||
| Vegetables | 0.56 | ||||
| Fruits | 0.70 | ||||
| Livestock and its products | 0.74 | ||||
| Poultry and its products | 0.64 | ||||
| Milk | 0.53 | ||||
| Eggs | 0.52 | ||||
| Seafood | 0.37 | ||||
| Snacks | 0.32 | 0.52 | |||
| Beverages | 0.69 | ||||
| Icecream | 0.36 | 0.64 | |||
| % of explained variance | 13.9 | 11.0 | 9.90 | 8.64 | 7.90 |
| % of accumulated explained variance | 13.9 | 24.9 | 34.8 | 43.5 | 51.3 |
RR (95% CI) of hypercholesterolemia on tertiles of energy-adjusted dietary pattern scores in the study.
Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex; Model 2 was adjusted for the baseline values of age, sex, education, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, energy intake, exercise and blood lipid concentrations.
| Tertiles of energy-adjusted dietary pattern score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Low | Middle | High |
|
| RR(95% CI) | RR(95% CI) | RR(95% CI) | ||
| Staple food pattern | ||||
| NO. of cases | 61 | 59 | 55 | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.98(0.69–1.39) | 0.83(0.66–1.12) | 0.39 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.97(0.66–1.44) | 0.76(0.62–1.05) | 0.17 |
| Vegetable, fruit and milk pattern | ||||
| NO. of cases | 66 | 56 | 53 | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.74(0.29–1.13) | 0.65(0.43–1.08) | 0.11 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.70(0.38–1.12) | 0.68(0.40–1.15) | 0.21 |
| Potato, soybean and egg pattern | ||||
| NO. of cases | 52 | 50 | 55 | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.98(0.69–1.40) | 1.07(0.62–1.60) | 0.35 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.98(0.65–1.50) | 1.01(0.66–1.53) | 0.77 |
| Snack pattern | ||||
| NO. of cases | 44 | 58 | 71 | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.24(0.98–1.72) | 1.86(1.07–2.79) | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.30(1.02–1.70) | 1.72(1.14–2.59) | 0.004 |
| Meat pattern | ||||
| NO. of cases | 48 | 55 | 54 | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.29(0.86–1.94) | 1.16(0.70–1.87) | 0.62 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.22(0.81–1.84) | 1.08(0.70–1.65) | 0.45 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.
The association between the snack pattern scores and serum cholesterol levels at follow-up using multiple linear regression analysis.
| Total cholesterol | LDL-c | HDL-c | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRC |
| SRC |
| SRC |
| |
| Snack pattern scores | 0.283 | 0.017 | 0.355 | <0.001 | -0.023 | 0.301 |
| Snack pattern scores | 0.262 | 0.025 | 0.324 | 0.002 | -0.025 | 0.268 |
Abbreviations: SRCs, standardized regression coefficients.
a SRCs were adjusted for age and sex;
b SRCs were adjusted for the baseline values of age, sex, education, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, energy intake, exercise and blood lipid concentrations.
Baseline characteristics and nutrient intakes according to tertile scores of the snack dietary in the study.
Data are means (SD) or n (%). Difference among tertiles were analyze by using ANOVA or χ2 test.
| Variable | Tertiles in the snack pattern scores |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Middle | High | ||
| Male (%) | 427(38.2) | 326(29.1) | 276(24.7) | < 0.001 |
| Age (years) | 51.9(9.68) | 51.5(9.24) | 47.9(10.5) | < 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.0(3.36) | 24.9(3.48) | 24.7(3.41) | 0.058 |
| Current smokers (%) | 175(15.7) | 170(15.2) | 159(14.2) | 0.029 |
| Current drinkers (%) | 363(32.5) | 350(31.3) | 276(24.7) | 0.044 |
| Regular exercise (%) | 587(52.6) | 537(47.9) | 485(43.4) | 0.011 |
| Nutrient intakes | ||||
| Energy (Kcal/d) | 2105(695) | 2287(710) | 2405(539) | < 0.001 |
| Carbohydrates (g/d) | 315(127) | 344(135) | 339(104) | 0.337 |
| Proteins (g/d) | 65.5(31.5) | 69.3(18.1) | 70.8(31.4) | 0.285 |
| Fats (g/d) | 67.0(21.0) | 70.5(13.1) | 86.1(22.4) | < 0.001 |
| Cholesterol (mg/d) | 312(225) | 300(172) | 393(311) | < 0.001 |
| Fiber (g/d) | 16.5(5.26) | 12.3(5.43) | 11.8(4.85) | < 0.001 |
| Vitamin A (μg RE/d) | 444(182) | 437 (162) | 464(207) | 0.208 |
| Vitamin E (mg/d) | 10.4(4.12) | 11.7(3.59) | 11.5(5.13) | 0.392 |
| Vitamin C (mg/d) | 107.4(56.9) | 95.7(53.0) | 105.3(63.5) | 0.267 |
| Vitamin B1 (mg/d) | 17.0(8.34) | 11.8(6.43) | 10.6(6.67) | 0.026 |
| Vitamin B2 (mg/d) | 0.95(0.35) | 0.97(0.46) | 0.92(0.34) | 0.464 |
| Folic acid (μg /d) | 58.9(26.7) | 44.6(22.0) | 39.0(23.1) | < 0.001 |
| Nicotinic acid (mg/d) | 13.9(5.26) | 13.8(4.84) | 13.9(5.39) | 0.315 |
| Phosphorus (mg/d) | 1205(444) | 1101(308) | 1082(473) | 0.729 |
| Calcium (mg/d) | 510(222) | 482(173) | 503(269) | 0.374 |
| Magnesium (mg/d) | 408(126) | 307(95) | 315(135) | < 0.001 |
| Ferrum (mg/d) | 21.8(8.11) | 21.4(9.32) | 25.7(6.48) | 0.139 |
| Cuprum (mg/d) | 2.28(0.81) | 2.27(1.01) | 2.01(0.70) | 0.405 |
| Manganese (mg/d) | 6.24(1.84) | 4.42(1.38) | 4.30(1.89) | < 0.001 |
| Zinc (mg/d) | 12.2(4.02) | 10.2(4.64) | 9.1(3.04) | 0.294 |
| Selenium (mg/d) | 51.5(43.2) | 50.2(31.2) | 49.5(15.9) | 0.682 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index.
a Difference among tertiles were analyze by using ANCOVA with age, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption and exercise as covariants.
b Difference among tertiles were analyze by using ANCOVA with age, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise and energy intake as covariants.