Literature DB >> 26244300

Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography and Conventional Retinal Imaging Strategies in Assessing Foveal Integrity in Geographic Atrophy.

Ramzi G Sayegh1, Stefan Zotter2, Philip K Roberts1, Maciej M Kandula3, Stefan Sacu1, David P Kreil3, Bernhard Baumann2, Michael Pircher2, Christoph K Hitzenberger2, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare current imaging methods with respect to their ability to detect the condition of the fovea in patients with geographic atrophy (GA).
METHODS: The retinas of 176 eyes with GA were imaged using two spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) systems, Cirrus HD-OCT and Spectralis HRA+OCT, and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and infrared imaging (IR) was used in the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) mode. Polarization-sensitive OCT (PS-OCT), which selectively visualizes the RPE in addition to SD-OCT features, was used to image 95 eyes. Geographic atrophy lesions were categorized as fovea spared, involved, or not quantifiable (grades 0, 1, and 2). Morphologic gradings were subsequently correlated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurements to independently identify the corresponding functional condition of the fovea. Cohen's κ statistics with a bootstrap method was applied to compare retinal imaging methods.
RESULTS: In PS-OCT, 84% of eyes with BCVA greater than or equal to 20/40 were detected, whereas in conventional retinal imaging the rate ranged from 27% in FAF to 45% in the SD-OCT segment. Cohen's κ statistics revealed significant differences between the gradings of PS-OCT and conventional imaging with κ = 0.488 and a global Hotelling's T2 statistic of 17.9 with a P value of P = 0.003. Statistical tests revealed no statistically significant differences between the conventional retinal imaging modalities.
CONCLUSIONS: Polarization-sensitive OCT can better allow correct grading of the fovea in relation to BCVA and identify foveal sparing than other imaging modalities. The differences in imaging precision should be considered in diagnostic and therapeutic evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26244300     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  7 in total

Review 1.  Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography - a review [Invited].

Authors:  Johannes F de Boer; Christoph K Hitzenberger; Yoshiaki Yasuno
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Tissue-like phantoms for quantitative birefringence imaging.

Authors:  Xinyu Liu; Kathy Beaudette; Xianghong Wang; Linbo Liu; Brett E Bouma; Martin Villiger
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  A view of the current and future role of optical coherence tomography in the management of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  U Schmidt-Erfurth; S Klimscha; S M Waldstein; H Bogunović
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Fundus autofluorescence imaging: systematic review of test accuracy for the diagnosis and monitoring of retinal conditions.

Authors:  G K Frampton; N Kalita; L Payne; J L Colquitt; E Loveman; S M Downes; A J Lotery
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Current therapeutic developments in atrophic age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Jakub Hanus; Fangkun Zhao; Shusheng Wang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Semi-automated quantification of geographic atrophy with blue-light autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a comparison between the region finder and the advanced retinal pigment epithelium tool in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Adrian Reumueller; Stefan Sacu; Maria Georgia Karantonis; Irene Steiner; Guenther Weigert; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 7.  Advances in Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Technology and Techniques for Choroidal and Retinal Disorders.

Authors:  Joshua Ong; Arman Zarnegar; Giulia Corradetti; Sumit Randhir Singh; Jay Chhablani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.