Literature DB >> 26244267

Forensic Mitochondrial DNA Analysis: Current Practice and Future Potential.

T Melton1, C Holland1, M Holland2.   

Abstract

Current practices for performing forensic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence analysis, as employed in public and private laboratories across the United States, have changed remarkably little over the past 20 years. Alternative approaches have been developed and proposed, and new technologies have emerged, but the core methods have remained relatively unchanged. Once DNA has been recovered from biological material (for example, from older skeletal remains and hair shafts), segments of the mtDNA control region are amplified using a variety of approaches, dictated by the quality of the sample being tested. The amplified mtDNA products are subjected to Sanger-based sequencing and data interpretation is performed using one of many available software packages. These relatively simple methods, at least in retrospect, have remained robust, and have stood the test of time. However, alternative methods for mtDNA analysis remain viable options (for example, linear array assays and dHPLC), and should be revisited as the desire to streamline the testing process, interpret heteroplasmy, and deconvolute mixed mtDNA profiles intensifies. Therefore, it is important to periodically reassess the alternative methods available to the mtDNA practitioner, and to evaluate newer technologies being put forth by the scientific community, for example, next-generation sequencing. Although the basic mitochondrial DNA protocols and practices of public and private laboratories are similar, an overview of the current practices of forensic mtDNA analysis is provided, helping to frame the path forward.
Copyright © 2012 Central Police University.

Keywords:  DGGE; DNA damage; Deep sequencing; dHPLC; mass spectrometry; mtDNA mixtures; screening

Year:  2012        PMID: 26244267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Rev        ISSN: 1042-7201


  9 in total

1.  MPS analysis of the mtDNA hypervariable regions on the MiSeq with improved enrichment.

Authors:  Mitchell M Holland; Laura A Wilson; Sarah Copeland; Gloria Dimick; Charity A Holland; Robert Bever; Jennifer A McElhoe
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  Blood stains of the Turin Shroud 2015: beyond personal hopes and limitations of techniques.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Minno; Rosanna Scala; Itala Ventre; Giovanni de Gaetano
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Development and assessment of an optimized next-generation DNA sequencing approach for the mtgenome using the Illumina MiSeq.

Authors:  Jennifer A McElhoe; Mitchell M Holland; Kateryna D Makova; Marcia Shu-Wei Su; Ian M Paul; Christine H Baker; Seth A Faith; Brian Young
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.882

4.  Analysis of mixtures using next generation sequencing of mitochondrial DNA hypervariable regions.

Authors:  Hanna Kim; Henry A Erlich; Cassandra D Calloway
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Population resequencing of European mitochondrial genomes highlights sex-bias in Bronze Age demographic expansions.

Authors:  Chiara Batini; Pille Hallast; Åshild J Vågene; Daniel Zadik; Heidi A Eriksen; Horolma Pamjav; Antti Sajantila; Jon H Wetton; Mark A Jobling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  MitoRS, a method for high throughput, sensitive, and accurate detection of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy.

Authors:  Julien Marquis; Gregory Lefebvre; Yiannis A I Kourmpetis; Mohamed Kassam; Frédéric Ronga; Umberto De Marchi; Andreas Wiederkehr; Patrick Descombes
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Pedigree derived mutation rate across the entire mitochondrial genome of the Norfolk Island population.

Authors:  J R Connell; M C Benton; R A Lea; H G Sutherland; J Chaseling; L M Haupt; K M Wright; L R Griffiths
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Pronounced somatic bottleneck in mitochondrial DNA of human hair.

Authors:  Alison Barrett; Barbara Arbeithuber; Arslan Zaidi; Peter Wilton; Ian M Paul; Rasmus Nielsen; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Reducing the Number of Mismatches between Hairs and Buccal References When Analysing mtDNA Heteroplasmic Variation by Massively Parallel Sequencing.

Authors:  Kristiaan J van der Gaag; Stijn Desmyter; Sophie Smit; Lourdes Prieto; Titia Sijen
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.