| Literature DB >> 26242978 |
Yu Wang1, Jian-Yun Li2, Min Han3, Wen-Long Wang4, Yun-Zhang Li5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been increasing worldwide in parallel with the obesity epidemic. This study aims to investigate the effects of the total flavonoids in Stellera chamaejasme L. (TFSC) on the experimental NAFLD in high fat diet fed (HFD) rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26242978 PMCID: PMC4526196 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-015-0082-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Primers used for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
| Gene | Primer pairs | Sequence( 5′ → 3′) | GenBank no | Product length(bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYP7A1 | Sense primer | AAAGCGGGAAAGCAAAGACCA | NM_012942 | 157 |
| Antisense primer | AGTTCAAAGCAGGAGAGCATCAGG | |||
| CPT-1 | Sense primer | CCGCAAACTGGACCGAGAAGAGAT | AF029875 | 185 |
| Antisense primer | TTTGCCTGGGATGCGTGTAGTGTT | |||
| PPAR-α | Sense primer | TACCTGTGAACACGATCTGA | NM_013196 | 136 |
| Antisense primer | GCTAGTCTTTCCTGCGAGTA | |||
| PPAR-γ | Sense primer | TGTGGGGATAAAGCATCAGC | NM_001145366 | 175 |
| Antisense primer | CAAGGCACTTCTGAAACCGA | |||
| SREBP-1c | Sense primer | AGGAGGCCATCTTGTTGCTT | AF286470 | 126 |
| Antisense primer | GTTTTGACCCTTAGGGCAGC | |||
| ACC | Sense primer | GGAAGACCTGGTCAAGAAGAAAAT | NM_022193 | 142 |
| Antisense primer | CACCAGATCCTTATTATTGT | |||
| β-actin | Sense primer | GGCACCACACTTTCTACAAT | NM_031144 | 123 |
| Antisense primer | AGGTCTCAAACATGATCTGG | |||
| Leptin | Sense primer | TGCCTATCCACAAAGTCCAG | NM_013076.2 | 381 |
| Antisense primer | TGCTCAGAGCCACCACCT | |||
| FAS | Sense primer | CGGCGTGTGATGGGGCTGGTA | NM_017332 | 145 |
| Antisense primer | AGGAGTAGTAGGCGGTGGTGTAGA |
Effect of total flavonoids in Stellera chamaejasme L. on weight (g) of rats (mean ± SD) (n = 20)
| Parameter | 4w | 6w | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control group | NAFLD group | Negative control group | Low-dose group | Middle-dose group | High-dose group | Positive control group | |
| Body weight (g) | 324.86 ± 24.17 | 341.45 ± 17.2★ | 365.35 ± 15.23 | 393.33 ± 23.17* | 380.61 ± 23.87*# | 373.52 ± 18.88# | 396.89 ± 21.22 |
| Liver weight (g) | 10.29 ± 0.98 | 14.39 ± 1.06★★ | 11.65 ± 0.98 | 18.53 ± 1.26** | 16.04 ± 1.17**# | 14.65 ± 1.08*## | 19.53 ± 1.25 |
| Liver/body weight (%) | 3.17 ± 0.17 | 4.21 ± 0.23★★ | 3.19 ± 0.23 | 4.71 ± 0.12** | 4.16 ± 0.22*# | 3.87 ± 0.19*## | 4.92 ± 0.35 |
★ P < 0.05, ★★ P < 0.01, compared to normal control group (4w). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared to normal group (6w); # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, compared to positive control group (6w)
Fig. 1H&E staining for histological evaluation. Typical photographs of liver sections of normal rat (a) and NAFLD rat (b) in 4 weeks; (c)normal rat (negative control group); (d) the rat treated with TFSC (100 mg/kg) for 6 weeks; (e) the rat treated with TFSC (200 mg/kg) for 6 weeks; (f) the rat treated with TFSC (400 mg/kg) for 6 weeks; (g) positive control group. (Magnification 400x)
Effect of total flavonoids in Stellera chamaejasme L. on serum lipid level in rats (mean ± SD) (n = 20)
| Parameter | 4w | 6w | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal group | NAFLD group | Normal group | Low-dose group | Middle-dose group | High-dose group | Positive control group | |
| AST (U/L) | 75.17 ± 4.31 | 96.85 ± 7.63★★ | 76.29 ± 5.16 | 97.36 ± 6.82** | 93.75 ± 4.55* | 88.34 ± 6.27*# | 101.67 ± 8.36 |
| ALT(U/L) | 28.16 ± 1.21 | 51.28 ± 3.26★★ | 29.25 ± 1.72 | 53.28 ± 4.41** | 49.78 ± 2.19** | 44.29 ± 2.22**# | 56.35 ± 4.16 |
| TG(mmol/L) | 0.59 ± 0.09 | 1.65 ± 0.08★★ | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 1.81 ± 0.11** | 1.46 ± 0.09**# | 0.92 ± 0.03**## | 2.12 ± 0.12 |
| TC(mmol/L) | 1.66 ± 0.12 | 3.14 ± 0.13★★ | 1.70 ± 0.09 | 3.82 ± 0.15** | 3.65 ± 0.17**# | 2.65 ± 0.12**## | 4.54 ± 0.24 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 1.25 ± 0.08★★ | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 1.37 ± 0.08** | 1.24 ± 0.05** | 1.09 ± 0.06**# | 1.35 ± 0.09 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.96 ± 0.04 | 0.64 ± 0.04★★ | 0.98 ± 0.05 | 0.64 ± 0.03** | 0.69 ± 0.05** | 0.77 ± 0.04*# | 0.55 ± 0.03 |
| GLU (mmol/L) | 4.68 ± 0.15 | 5.07 ± 0.21 | 4.56 ± 0.18 | 4.99 ± 0.87 | 5.07 ± 0.04 | 5.13 ± 18.88 | 5.41 ± 0.19 |
| TBA(μmol/L) | 6.75 ± 0.05 | 10.23 ± 0.06★★ | 6.54 ± 0.06 | 11.53 ± 1.27** | 11.04 ± 0.98** | 10.24 ± 0.05**# | 12.27 ± 1.25 |
| Leptin (μg/L) | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.01★ | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.46 ± 0.03** | 0.34 ± 0.02*# | 0.28 ± 0.01# | 0.46 ± 0.03 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 374.36 ± 17.86 | 300.4 ± 20.1★★ | 370.35 ± 19.46 | 293.4 ± 24.1** | 321.79 ± 23.16* | 348.32 ± 19.76# | 297.84 ± 23.17 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 3.26 ± 0.21 | 4.27 ± 0.16★★ | 3.25 ± 0.75 | 4.98 ± 1.32* | 4.77 ± 0.87* | 3.84 ± 0.99## | 5.04 ± 1.27 |
| GSH-Px (U/mL) | 256.21 ± 19.25 | 210.45 ± 14.2★ | 255.98 ± 20.54 | 206.88 ± 15.3** | 211.57 ± 17.45**# | 238.78 ± 14.25# | 194.21 ± 17.35 |
★ P < 0.05, ★★ P < 0.01, compared to normal control group (4w). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared to normal group (6w); # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, compared to positive control group (6w). Normal Group: the group was given normal diet (n = 20) for 4 weeks; NAFLD Group: the group was given high-fat diet (n = 20) for 4 weeks;Negative Control Group: After the normal diet of 4 weeks, the group was given normal diet (n = 20) for 6 weeks; Low-dose group: After the HFD of 4 weeks, the group was administered TFSC orally once a day at a low dose of 100 mg/kg (n = 20) for 6 weeks; Middle-dose group: After the HFD of 4 weeks, the group was administered TFSC orally once a day at a medium dose of 200 mg/kg (n = 20) for 6 weeks; High-dose group: After the HFD of 4 weeks, the group was administered TFSC orally once a day at a high dose of 400 mg/kg (n = 20) for 6 weeks; Positive control group: After the HFD of 4 weeks, the group was given high-fat diet (n = 20) for 6 weeks
Fig. 2Scores of hepatic steatosis of rat livers. The scores were determined, according to the the percentage of hepatocytes containing lipid droplets. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of each group (n = 20 per group) and determined by a pathologist in a blinded fashion. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared to normal control group, # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, compared to positive control group
Fig. 3The expression of lipid metabolic regulators in the liver. (A) The expression of hepatic PPAR-γand related genes. The relative expression levels of hepatic PPAR-γ, ACC, SREBP-1c, LEP and FAS mRNA transcripts were determinedby real-time PCR in liver samples of rats from the positive control group (NAFLD rats) and the different doses of TFSC-treated group (n =20 per group). (B) The expression of CYP7A1and related genes. The relative expression levels of hepatic CYP7A1, CPT-1 and PPAR-α mRNA transcripts were determined by real-time PCR in liver samples of rats from the positive control group (NAFLD rats) and the different doses of TFSC-treated group (n =20 per group). Values are means ± positive and negative errors. Differences between groups were determined by Student’s t test. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 versus the positive control group (NAFLD rats). Abbreviations: CYP7A1, Cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase1; CPT, carnitine palmitoyltransferase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; SREBP, sterol regulatory element-binding protein; ACC, Acetyl-CoA carboxylase, FAS, Fatty acid synthase, LEP, Leptin
Effects of Total Flavonoids in Stellera chamaejasme L. on liver lipid level in rats (mean ± SD) (n = 20)
| Group | Hepatic TC (mg/g) | Hepatic TG (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 0.89 ± 0.06 | 1.52 ± 0.11 |
| Low-dose group | 3.86 ± 0.26** | 2.56 ± 0.16 |
| Middle-dose group | 3.16 ± 0.27**# | 2.36 ± 0.12 |
| High-dose group | 2.19 ± 0.13** ## | 1.78 ± 0.09## |
| Positive control group | 4.37 ± 0.24 | 2.97 ± 0.19 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared to normal group (6w); # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, compared to positive control group (6w)