Literature DB >> 26242724

Comparison of nutrient intakes from two selected diet plans considered healthful versus the cutoff points for green lights as defined by the UK's multiple traffic light scheme.

H Green1, E Fern2.   

Abstract

This study compared nutrient intakes from 7-day menus for the US MyPlate and DASH Eating Plan versus the cutoff points for green lights defined by the UK's multiple traffic light (MTL) scheme. For both diets, the foods achieved green lights for saturated fat and salt, and for beverages for total fat, saturated fat and salt. The other nutrients achieved amber lights but were within the range of the two diets. By contrast, the MTL threshold for salt in beverages was outside the range of the diets. The values for salt in beverages in the MyPlate and Dash diet plans were 0.06±0.07 and 0.19±0.01 (s.d.) g/100 ml, which are both considerably lower compared with the cutoff of 0.3 g/100 ml for an MTL green light. Adjusting the green MTL threshold values to the median values for a healthful diet could help make MTL labelling a more valid way of helping consumers choose a healthful diet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26242724     DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  3 in total

1.  Where is the science? What will it take to show that nutrient profiling systems work?

Authors:  Marilyn S Townsend
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Testing nutrient profile models using data from a survey of nutrition professionals.

Authors:  Peter Scarborough; Anna Boxer; Mike Rayner; Lynn Stockley
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Dietary energy density is associated with energy intake and weight status in US adults.

Authors:  Jenny H Ledikwe; Heidi M Blanck; Laura Kettel Khan; Mary K Serdula; Jennifer D Seymour; Beth C Tohill; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.045

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.