Literature DB >> 26242545

[Bootcamp: longitudinal gender-based surgical and clinical skills training].

G Gradl1, A Bühren2, M Simon3, B Derntl4, H-C Pape5, M Knobe5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex parity of medical students has increased to the degree that approximately 50 % of medical students are women. Orthopedic and trauma surgery, however, has not managed to keep up with this trend and women are still grossly underrepresented.
OBJECTIVES: Description of an innovative longitudinal gender-based surgical and clinical skills training course.
METHODS: An elective 5-day modular skills course is offered for third to fifth year medical students. Module 1 aims at teaching basic surgical and communication skills involving local and regional anesthesia, initial experience with arthroscopy, fracture fixation, emergency measures as well as communication skills training using standardized patients. The subsequent modules cover surgical knowledge and skills of increasing complexity. The main goals are to increase the interest in orthopedic trauma surgery and to reduce concerns regarding discrimination and gender-related issues. Learning outcomes are assessed using a 6-item multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) and a 3-stage objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) regarding induction of anesthesia, arthroscopy simulation and communication skills.
RESULTS: A total of 52 second year medical students (39 females, 13 males) completed module I. There were no differences between men and women with regard to the MCQ and anesthesia and communication skills; however, male students scored significantly higher in the arthroscopy test. All students rated the course as being highly effective in terms of acquisition of knowledge and skills. Almost all participants would recommend the course to fellow students and 70 % of participants stated they would participate in the advanced courses. Female participants in particular reported a marked increase in interest in orthopedic trauma surgery and less concerns regarding discrimination and gender-related issues.
CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of the approach will have to be proven by further evaluation, especially with respect to assessment of career development and application rates of participants. Adaptation of environmental and working conditions to suit women's needs seem to play an important role in promoting new surgery residents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrimination; Innovative teaching approach; Modular construction; Reservations; Student promotion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26242545     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-015-0048-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  31 in total

1.  Factors affecting interest in orthopedics among female medical students: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Keith Baldwin; Surena Namdari; Andrea Bowers; Mary Ann Keenan; L Scott Levin; Jaimo Ahn
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.390

2.  Women in surgery: the same, yet different.

Authors:  Jo Buyske
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-03

3.  An international perspective on interest in a general surgery career among final-year medical students.

Authors:  Chandrakanth Are; Hugh A Stoddard; Francesco Prete; Song Tianqiang; Lindsay M Northam; Sharon Chan; Janet Lee; Pankaj Jani; Mladjan Protic; S Venkateshwarulu; Abeezar Sarela; Jon S Thompson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Orthopedic boot camp: examining the effectiveness of an intensive surgical skills course.

Authors:  Ranil R Sonnadara; Aaron Van Vliet; Oleg Safir; Benjamin Alman; Peter Ferguson; William Kraemer; Richard Reznick
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Does gender predict performance of novices undergoing Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) training?

Authors:  Michael T White; Kathryn Welch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  [Promoting the next generation - what can we improve?].

Authors:  M Niethard; S Donner; D Depeweg; G Bode; J P Schüttrumpf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Learning styles of medical students, general surgery residents, and general surgeons: implications for surgical education.

Authors:  Paul T Engels; Chris de Gara
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Who wants to be a surgeon? A study of 300 first year medical students.

Authors:  Thomas H S Fysh; Geraint Thomas; Harold Ellis
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  The difficult doctor? Characteristics of physicians who report frustration with patients: an analysis of survey data.

Authors:  Erin E Krebs; Joanne M Garrett; Thomas R Konrad
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Arthroscopy or ultrasound in undergraduate anatomy education: a randomized cross-over controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; John Bennet Carow; Miriam Ruesseler; Benjamin Moritz Leu; Melanie Simon; Stefan K Beckers; Alireza Ghassemi; Tolga T Sönmez; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  3 in total

1.  Team-based learning for teaching musculoskeletal ultrasound skills: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Cassian Cremerius; Gertraud Gradl-Dietsch; Frank J P Beeres; Björn -Christian Link; Lea Hitpaß; Sven Nebelung; Klemens Horst; Christian David Weber; Carl Neuerburg; Daphne Eschbach; Christopher Bliemel; Matthias Knobe
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Gender benefit in laparoscopic surgical performance using a 3D-display system: data from a randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Jana Busshoff; Rabi R Datta; Thomas Bruns; Robert Kleinert; Bernd Morgenstern; David Pfister; Costanza Chiapponi; Hans F Fuchs; Michael Thomas; Caroline Gietzelt; Andrea Hedergott; Desdemona Möller; Martin Hellmich; Christiane J Bruns; Dirk L Stippel; Roger Wahba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Peyton's four-step approach for teaching complex spinal manipulation techniques - a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Gertraud Gradl-Dietsch; Cavan Lübke; Klemens Horst; Melanie Simon; Ali Modabber; Tolga T Sönmez; Ralf Münker; Sven Nebelung; Matthias Knobe
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.