Mukul Minocha1, Jonathan Q Tran2, James P Sheridan3, Ahmed A Othman4,5. 1. Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie, 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Clinical Pharmacology, Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. AbbVie Biotherapeutics, Redwood City, CA, USA. 4. Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie, 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, USA. ahmed.othman@abbvie.com. 5. Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. ahmed.othman@abbvie.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Daclizumab high-yield process (DAC HYP) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively blocks the α-subunit (CD25) of the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptors, and has shown robust efficacy as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). This work quantitatively characterized the relationship between DAC HYP serum concentrations and saturation of CD25 expressed on antigen-rich target T cells in blood. METHODS: Serial pharmacokinetic and 968 CD25 measurements from three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I studies of DAC HYP (50-300 mg subcutaneous and 200-400 mg intravenous doses or placebo) in healthy volunteers (n = 95) were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. CD25 occupancy was determined using flow cytometry and a fluorescently-labeled DAC HYP-competing antibody. RESULTS:CD25 occupancy was described using a direct inhibitory sigmoidal maximum effect (E max) model (where DAC HYP fully inhibited CD25 labeling with competing antibody). Two IC50 (serum concentration corresponding to 50 % of maximal inhibition) parameters were used to describe rapid CD25 saturation at initiation of dosing and apparently slower desaturation during DAC HYP washout. Parameter estimates (95 % bootstrap confidence intervals) were: baseline CD25 labeling, 47 % (45-48); DAC HYP IC50(saturation), 0.023 µg/mL (0.005-0.073); IC50(desaturation) 0.86 µg/mL (0.74-0.98); Hill coefficient 5.6 (4.3-6.8). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the developed model, the 150 mg monthly subcutaneous regimen of DAC HYP in subjects with MS is predicted to saturate CD25 on target effector T cells within a few hours of dosing and maintain CD25 saturation during the entire dosing interval. Free CD25 levels return to baseline within 4-6 months of the last DAC HYP dose.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Daclizumab high-yield process (DAC HYP) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively blocks the α-subunit (CD25) of the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptors, and has shown robust efficacy as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). This work quantitatively characterized the relationship between DAC HYP serum concentrations and saturation of CD25 expressed on antigen-rich target T cells in blood. METHODS: Serial pharmacokinetic and 968 CD25 measurements from three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I studies of DAC HYP (50-300 mg subcutaneous and 200-400 mg intravenous doses or placebo) in healthy volunteers (n = 95) were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. CD25 occupancy was determined using flow cytometry and a fluorescently-labeled DAC HYP-competing antibody. RESULTS:CD25 occupancy was described using a direct inhibitory sigmoidal maximum effect (E max) model (where DAC HYP fully inhibited CD25 labeling with competing antibody). Two IC50 (serum concentration corresponding to 50 % of maximal inhibition) parameters were used to describe rapid CD25 saturation at initiation of dosing and apparently slower desaturation during DAC HYP washout. Parameter estimates (95 % bootstrap confidence intervals) were: baseline CD25 labeling, 47 % (45-48); DAC HYP IC50(saturation), 0.023 µg/mL (0.005-0.073); IC50(desaturation) 0.86 µg/mL (0.74-0.98); Hill coefficient 5.6 (4.3-6.8). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the developed model, the 150 mg monthly subcutaneous regimen of DAC HYP in subjects with MS is predicted to saturate CD25 on target effector T cells within a few hours of dosing and maintain CD25 saturation during the entire dosing interval. Free CD25 levels return to baseline within 4-6 months of the last DAC HYP dose.
Authors: R Gregg; C M Smith; F J Clark; D Dunnion; N Khan; R Chakraverty; L Nayak; P A Moss Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Bibiana Bielekova; Marta Catalfamo; Susan Reichert-Scrivner; Amy Packer; Magdalena Cerna; Thomas A Waldmann; Henry McFarland; Pierre A Henkart; Roland Martin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: James P Sheridan; Ying Zhang; Katherine Riester; Meina T Tang; Lyubov Efros; Jia Shi; Jeffrey Harris; Vladimir Vexler; Jacob S Elkins Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Calliope A Dendrou; Vincent Plagnol; Erik Fung; Jennie H M Yang; Kate Downes; Jason D Cooper; Sarah Nutland; Gillian Coleman; Matthew Himsworth; Matthew Hardy; Oliver Burren; Barry Healy; Neil M Walker; Kerstin Koch; Willem H Ouwehand; John R Bradley; Nicholas J Wareham; John A Todd; Linda S Wicker Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-08-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Bibiana Bielekova; Thomas Howard; Amy N Packer; Nancy Richert; Gregg Blevins; Joan Ohayon; Thomas A Waldmann; Henry F McFarland; Roland Martin Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-04
Authors: Ralf Gold; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Gavin Giovannoni; Krzysztof Selmaj; Eva Kubala Havrdova; Xavier Montalban; Dusan Stefoski; Till Sprenger; Randy R Robinson; Sami Fam; Jonathan Smith; Spyros Chalkias; Giorgio Giannattasio; Gabriel Lima; Wanda Castro-Borrero Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 4.849