Literature DB >> 26242213

Outcomes in Nonagenarians Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER-I Trial.

Vinod H Thourani1, Hanna A Jensen2, Vasilis Babaliaros2, Susheel K Kodali3, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran4, John Ehrlinger4, Eugene H Blackstone4, Rakesh M Suri4, Creighton W Don5, Gabriel Aldea5, Mathew R Williams6, Raj Makkar7, Lars G Svensson4, James M McCabe5, Larry S Dean5, Samir Kapadia4, David J Cohen8, Augusto D Pichard9, Wilson Y Szeto10, Howard C Herrmann10, Chandan Devireddy2, Bradley G Leshnower2, Gorav Ailawadi11, Hersh S Maniar12, Rebecca T Hahn3, Martin B Leon3, Michael Mack13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study describes short-term and mid-term outcomes of nonagenarian patients undergoing transfemoral or transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER)-I trial.
METHODS: From April 2007 to February 2012, 531 nonagenarians, mean age 93 ± 2.1 years, underwent TAVR with a balloon-expandable prosthesis in the PARTNER-I trial: 329 through transfemoral (TF-TAVR) and 202 transapical (TA-TAVR) access. Clinical events were adjudicated and echocardiographic results analyzed in a core laboratory. Quality of life (QoL) data were obtained up to 1 year post-TAVR. Time-varying all-cause mortality was referenced to that of an age-sex-race-matched US population.
RESULTS: For TF-TAVR, post-procedure 30-day stroke risk was 3.6%; major adverse events occurred in 35% of patients; 30-day paravalvular leak was greater than moderate in 1.4%; median post-procedure length of stay (LOS) was 5 days. Thirty-day mortality was 4.0% and 3-year mortality 48% (44% for the matched population). By 6 months, most QoL measures had stabilized at a level considerably better than baseline, with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) 72 ± 21. For TA-TAVR, post-procedure 30-day stroke risk was 2.0%; major adverse events 32%; 30-day paravalvular leak was greater than moderate in 0.61%; and median post-procedure LOS was 8 days. Thirty-day mortality was 12% and 3-year mortality 54% (42% for the matched population); KCCQ was 73 ± 23.
CONCLUSIONS: A TAVR can be performed in nonagenarians with acceptable short- and mid-term outcomes. Although TF- and TA-TAVR outcomes are not directly comparable, TA-TAVR appears to carry a higher risk of early death without a difference in intermediate-term mortality. Age alone should not preclude referral for TAVR in nonagenarians.
Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26242213     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  15 in total

Review 1.  Alternate Access for TAVI: Stay Clear of the Chest.

Authors:  Pavel Overtchouk; Thomas Modine
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-09

2.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians: early and intermediate outcome from the OBSERVANT study and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Paola D'Errigo; Stefano Rosato; Marek Pol; Corrado Tamburino; Marco Ranucci; Fulvia Seccareccia
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Should Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Be Performed in Nonagenarians?: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.

Authors:  Mani Arsalan; Molly Szerlip; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Elizabeth M Holper; Suzanne V Arnold; Zhuokai Li; Michael J DiMaio; John S Rumsfeld; David L Brown; Michael J Mack
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  TAVR in Nonagenarians: Pushing the Boundaries.

Authors:  William S Weintraub
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in nonagenarians: selectively feasible or extravagantly futile?

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis; Antonis A Manolis
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 6.  Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Unfavorable Aortoiliofemoral Anatomy.

Authors:  Jayendrakumar S Patel; Amar Krishnaswamy; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; Stephanie Mick; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Feasibility and clinical outcomes in nonagenarians undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the LOTUS™ valve.

Authors:  Satish Ramkumar; Hashrul N Rashid; Sarah Zaman; Liam McCormick; Robert Gooley; Damon Jackson; Ian T Meredith
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 8.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a revolution in the therapy of elderly and high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Teoman Kilic; Irem Yilmaz
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Comparison of in-hospital outcomes between octogenarians and nonagenarians undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a propensity matched analysis.

Authors:  Rajkumar Doshi; Vaibhav Patel; Priyank Shah
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  Clinical outcome in nonagenarians undergoing transcatheter valve replacement.

Authors:  Oscar Mendiz; Carlos Fava; Fernando Cura; Carla Agatiello; Matias Sztejfman; Anibal Damonte; Hugo Londero; Alfonsina Candiello; Daniel Berrocal
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.