Erica P Gunderson1, Charles P Quesenberry, Xian Ning, David R Jacobs, Myron Gross, David C Goff, Mark J Pletcher, Cora E Lewis. 1. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; the Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado; and the Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate lactation duration in relation to subsequent atherosclerosis in women during midlife. METHODS: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study is a multicenter prospective cohort that enrolled 2,787 women in 1985-1986 (ages 18-30 years, 52% black, 48% white), of whom 2,014 (72%) attended the 20-year follow-up examination in 2005-2006. We selected 846 women (46% black) without heart disease or diabetes at baseline who delivered one or more times after the baseline evaluation, had cardiometabolic risk factors measured at baseline, and had maximum common carotid intima-media thickness (mm) measured at the 20-year follow-up examination in 2005-2006. Lactation duration was summed across all postbaseline births for each woman and (n, women) categorized as: 0 to less than 1 month (n=262), 1 to less than 6 months (n=210), 6 to less than 10 months (n=169), and 10 months or greater (n=205). Multiple linear regression models estimated mean common carotid intima-media thickness (95% confidence interval) and mean differences among lactation duration groups compared with the 0 to less than 1-month group adjusted for prepregnancy obesity, cardiometabolic status, parity, and other risk factors. RESULTS: Lactation duration had a graded inverse association with common carotid intima-media thickness; mean differences between 10 months or greater compared with 0 to less than 1 month ranged from -0.062 mm for unadjusted models (P trend <.001) to -0.029 mm for models fully adjusted for prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and cardiometabolic risk factors, parity, smoking, and sociodemographics (P trend=.010). Stepwise addition of potential mediators (BMI, systolic blood pressure at the 20-year follow-up examination) modestly attenuated the lactation and common carotid intima-media thickness association to -0.027 and -0.023 mm (P trend=.019 and .054). CONCLUSION: Shorter lactation duration is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis independent of prepregnancy cardiometabolic risk factors and traditional risk factors. The magnitude of differences in carotid artery intima-media thickness may represent greater vascular aging. Lactation may have long-term benefits that lower cardiovascular disease risk in women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate lactation duration in relation to subsequent atherosclerosis in women during midlife. METHODS: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study is a multicenter prospective cohort that enrolled 2,787 women in 1985-1986 (ages 18-30 years, 52% black, 48% white), of whom 2,014 (72%) attended the 20-year follow-up examination in 2005-2006. We selected 846 women (46% black) without heart disease or diabetes at baseline who delivered one or more times after the baseline evaluation, had cardiometabolic risk factors measured at baseline, and had maximum common carotid intima-media thickness (mm) measured at the 20-year follow-up examination in 2005-2006. Lactation duration was summed across all postbaseline births for each woman and (n, women) categorized as: 0 to less than 1 month (n=262), 1 to less than 6 months (n=210), 6 to less than 10 months (n=169), and 10 months or greater (n=205). Multiple linear regression models estimated mean common carotid intima-media thickness (95% confidence interval) and mean differences among lactation duration groups compared with the 0 to less than 1-month group adjusted for prepregnancy obesity, cardiometabolic status, parity, and other risk factors. RESULTS: Lactation duration had a graded inverse association with common carotid intima-media thickness; mean differences between 10 months or greater compared with 0 to less than 1 month ranged from -0.062 mm for unadjusted models (P trend <.001) to -0.029 mm for models fully adjusted for prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and cardiometabolic risk factors, parity, smoking, and sociodemographics (P trend=.010). Stepwise addition of potential mediators (BMI, systolic blood pressure at the 20-year follow-up examination) modestly attenuated the lactation and common carotid intima-media thickness association to -0.027 and -0.023 mm (P trend=.019 and .054). CONCLUSION: Shorter lactation duration is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis independent of prepregnancy cardiometabolic risk factors and traditional risk factors. The magnitude of differences in carotid artery intima-media thickness may represent greater vascular aging. Lactation may have long-term benefits that lower cardiovascular disease risk in women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Emily Oken; Rita Patel; Lauren B Guthrie; Konstantin Vilchuck; Natalia Bogdanovich; Natalia Sergeichick; Tom M Palmer; Michael S Kramer; Richard M Martin Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: L K Callaway; A Mamun; H D McIntyre; G M Williams; J M Najman; M D Nitert; D A Lawlor Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Joseph F Polak; Sharina D Person; Gina S Wei; Ayleen Godreau; David R Jacobs; Anita Harrington; Stephen Sidney; Daniel H O'Leary Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Veeral H Ajmera; Norah A Terrault; Lisa B VanWagner; Monika Sarkar; Cora E Lewis; John J Carr; Erica P Gunderson Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Ellen M Chetwynd; Alison M Stuebe; Lynn Rosenberg; Melissa Troester; Diane Rowley; Julie R Palmer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-10-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Malamo E Countouris; Claudia Holzman; Andrew D Althouse; Gabrielle G Snyder; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Steven E Reis; Janet M Catov Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Yamnia I Cortés; Janet M Catov; Maria Brooks; Samar R El Khoudary; Rebecca C Thurston; Karen A Matthews; Carmen R Isasi; Elizabeth A Jackson; Emma Barinas-Mitchell Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 5.162