Literature DB >> 26240854

Modeling false positive detections in species occurrence data under different study designs.

Thierry Chambert, David A W Miller, James D Nichols.   

Abstract

The occurrence of false positive detections in presence-absence data, even when they occur infrequently, can lead to severe bias when estimating species occupancy patterns. Building upon previous efforts to account for this source of observational error, we established a general framework to model false positives in occupancy studies and extend existing modeling approaches to encompass a broader range of sampling designs. Specifically, we identified three common sampling designs that are likely to cover most scenarios encountered by researchers. The different designs all included ambiguous detections, as well as some known-truth data, but their modeling differed in the level of the model hierarchy at which the known-truth information was incorporated (site level or observation level). For each model, we provide the likelihood, as well as R and BUGS code needed for implementation. We also establish a clear terminology and provide guidance to help choosing the most appropriate design and modeling approach.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26240854     DOI: 10.1890/14-1507.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  8 in total

1.  Monitoring for the Management of Disease Risk in Animal Translocation Programmes.

Authors:  James D Nichols; Tuula E Hollmen; James B Grand
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  Random sampling causes the low reproducibility of rare eukaryotic OTUs in Illumina COI metabarcoding.

Authors:  Matthieu Leray; Nancy Knowlton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Plant DNA metabarcoding of lake sediments: How does it represent the contemporary vegetation.

Authors:  Inger Greve Alsos; Youri Lammers; Nigel Giles Yoccoz; Tina Jørgensen; Per Sjögren; Ludovic Gielly; Mary E Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Improving geographically extensive acoustic survey designs for modeling species occurrence with imperfect detection and misidentification.

Authors:  Katharine M Banner; Kathryn M Irvine; Thomas J Rodhouse; Wilson J Wright; Rogelio M Rodriguez; Andrea R Litt
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Temporally adaptive acoustic sampling to maximize detection across a suite of focal wildlife species.

Authors:  Cathleen Balantic; Therese Donovan
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Dependent double-observer method reduces false-positive errors in auditory avian survey data.

Authors:  Kaitlyn M Strickfaden; Danielle A Fagre; Jessie D Golding; Alan H Harrington; Kaitlyn M Reintsma; Jason D Tack; Victoria J Dreitz
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Integrating occurrence and detectability patterns based on interview data: a case study for threatened mammals in Equatorial Guinea.

Authors:  Chele Martínez-Martí; María V Jiménez-Franco; J Andrew Royle; José A Palazón; José F Calvo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Dynamic wildlife occupancy models using automated acoustic monitoring data.

Authors:  Cathleen Balantic; Therese Donovan
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.657

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.