PURPOSE: The optimal treatment of stage IA nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is not well defined. Thus, we performed an analysis using the database of the German Hodgkin Study Group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The long-term outcome of 256 patients with stage IA NLPHL was evaluated. Patients had received combined-modality treatment (CMT; n = 72), extended-field radiotherapy (EF-RT; n = 49), involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT; n = 108), or four weekly standard doses of rituximab (n = 27) within German Hodgkin Study Group clinical trial protocols between 1988 and 2009. RESULTS: The median age at NLPHL diagnosis was 39 years (range, 16 to 75 years). Most patients were male (76%). The whole patient group had a median follow-up of 91 months (CMT: 95 months; EF-RT: 110 months; IF-RT: 87 months; rituximab: 49 months). At 8 years, progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 88.5% and 98.6% for CMT, 84.3% and 95.7% for EF-RT, and 91.9% and 99.0% for IF-RT, respectively. Patients treated with rituximab had 4-year progression-free and overall survival rates of 81.0% and 100%, respectively. A second malignancy during the course of follow-up was diagnosed in 17 (6.6%) of 256 patients. A total of 12 deaths occurred. However, only one patient died from NLPHL. CONCLUSION: Tumor control in this analysis was equivalent with CMT, EF-RT, and IF-RT. Therefore, IF-RT, which is associated with the lowest risk for the development of toxic effects, should be considered as standard of care for patients with stage IA NLPHL. Rituximab alone is associated with an increased risk of relapse in this patient population.
PURPOSE: The optimal treatment of stage IA nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is not well defined. Thus, we performed an analysis using the database of the German Hodgkin Study Group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The long-term outcome of 256 patients with stage IA NLPHL was evaluated. Patients had received combined-modality treatment (CMT; n = 72), extended-field radiotherapy (EF-RT; n = 49), involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT; n = 108), or four weekly standard doses of rituximab (n = 27) within German Hodgkin Study Group clinical trial protocols between 1988 and 2009. RESULTS: The median age at NLPHL diagnosis was 39 years (range, 16 to 75 years). Most patients were male (76%). The whole patient group had a median follow-up of 91 months (CMT: 95 months; EF-RT: 110 months; IF-RT: 87 months; rituximab: 49 months). At 8 years, progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 88.5% and 98.6% for CMT, 84.3% and 95.7% for EF-RT, and 91.9% and 99.0% for IF-RT, respectively. Patients treated with rituximab had 4-year progression-free and overall survival rates of 81.0% and 100%, respectively. A second malignancy during the course of follow-up was diagnosed in 17 (6.6%) of 256 patients. A total of 12 deaths occurred. However, only one patient died from NLPHL. CONCLUSION: Tumor control in this analysis was equivalent with CMT, EF-RT, and IF-RT. Therefore, IF-RT, which is associated with the lowest risk for the development of toxic effects, should be considered as standard of care for patients with stage IA NLPHL. Rituximab alone is associated with an increased risk of relapse in this patient population.
Authors: D A Eichenauer; H Goergen; A Plütschow; D Wongso; K Behringer; S Kreissl; I Thielen; T Halbsguth; P J Bröckelmann; M Fuchs; B Böll; B von Tresckow; P Borchmann; A Engert Journal: Leukemia Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Sughosh Dhakal; Ranjana Advani; Leslie K Ballas; Bouthaina S Dabaja; Christopher R Flowers; Chul S Ha; Bradford S Hoppe; Nancy P Mendenhall; Monika L Metzger; John P Plastaras; Kenneth B Roberts; Ronald Shapiro; Sonali M Smith; Stephanie A Terezakis; Karen M Winkfield; Anas Younes; Louis S Constine Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Paul J Bröckelmann; Dennis A Eichenauer; Tina Jakob; Markus Follmann; Andreas Engert; Nicole Skoetz Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Burton E Appel; Lu Chen; Allen B Buxton; Robert E Hutchison; David C Hodgson; Peter F Ehrlich; Louis S Constine; Cindy L Schwartz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544