Literature DB >> 26239937

Agricultural waste utilisation strategies and demand for urban waste compost: Evidence from smallholder farmers in Ethiopia.

Abebe Nigussie1, Thomas W Kuyper2, Andreas de Neergaard3.   

Abstract

The use of agricultural waste for soil amendment is limited in developing countries. Competition between fuel and feed is the major cause for the insufficient application of agricultural waste on cropland. The aims of this study were therefore (i) to investigate variation in agricultural waste allocation between groups of farmers with different livelihood strategies and link this allocation with the nutrient balances of their production systems, (ii) to identify farm characteristics that influence utilisation of agricultural waste for soil amendment, and (iii) to assess demand for urban waste compost. A total of 220 farmers were selected randomly and interviewed using standardised semi-structured questionnaires. Four groups of farmers, namely (i) field crop farmers, (ii) vegetable producers, (iii) ornamental-plant growers, and (iv) farmers practising mixed farming, were identified using categorical principal component and two-step cluster analyses. Field crop farmers produced the largest quantity of agricultural waste, but they allocated 80% of manure to fuel and 85% of crop residues to feed. Only <10% of manure and crop residues were applied on soils. Farmers also sold manure and crop residues, and this generated 5-10% of their annual income. Vegetable and ornamental-plant growers allocated over 40% of manure and crop residues to soil amendment. Hence, nutrient balances were less negative in vegetable production systems. Education, farm size, land tenure and access to extension services were the variables that impeded allocation of agricultural waste to soil amendment. Replacement of fuel and feed through sustainable means is a viable option for soil fertility management. Urban waste compost should also be used as alternative option for soil amendment. Our results showed variation in compost demand between farmers. Education, landownership, experience with compost and access to extension services explained variation in compost demand. We also demonstrated that labour availability should be used to estimate compost demand beside cash.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal manure; Compost; Crop residue; Livelihood strategy; Municipal waste

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26239937     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.07.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  3 in total

1.  Socioeconomic, agricultural, and individual factors influencing farmers' perceptions and willingness of compost production and use: an evidence from Wadi al-Far'a Watershed-Palestine.

Authors:  Suha Al-Madbouh; Issam A Al-Khatib; Majed I Al-Sari; Jumana I Salahat; Baraa Y A Jararaa; Lars Ribbe
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Effect of Farmland Scale on Farmers' Application Behavior with Organic Fertilizer.

Authors:  Yushi Chen; Xinhong Fu; Yuying Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) in a refugee context in East Africa: Kitchen gardening helps with mineral provision.

Authors:  Desta Woldetsadik; Eulogio J Llorent-Martínez; Solomie Gebrezgabher; Mary Njenga; Ruth Mendum; Roxana Castillo-López; Maria L Fernández-de Córdova; Hillette Hailu; Colby T Evans; Nelly Madani; Tamlyn P Mafika; David E B Fleming
Journal:  SN Appl Sci       Date:  2021-12-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.