Literature DB >> 26239895

Initial Clinical Experience: Symmetric-Tip Dialysis Catheter with Helical Flow Characteristics Improves Patient Outcomes.

Timothy W I Clark1, Jonas W Redmond2, Mark P Mantell3, Gregory J Nadolski2, Jeffrey I Mondschein2, Michael F Dowd2, Mandeep S Dagli2, Deepak Sudheendra2, Richard D Shlansky-Goldberg2, Raphael D Cohen4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report preliminary clinical experience with a new symmetric-tip dialysis catheter compared with a conventional split-tip catheter.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 5-month period, patients requiring a tunneled catheter for hemodialysis or undergoing exchange of a dysfunctional dialysis catheter at a tertiary academic medical center were retrospectively analyzed. Patients underwent placement of a VectorFlow or Ash Split Cath catheter at the discretion of the inserting interventional radiologist. Patient demographics, catheter patency, mean blood flow rate, and arterial and venous pressures were compared according to catheter type. Catheter failure was analyzed based on clinical and anatomic variables by using a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model.
RESULTS: A total of 33 VectorFlow and 46 Ash Split Cath catheters were placed. Patients in the VectorFlow group had significantly higher body mass index (P = .013) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = .049), as well as more non-internal jugular vein placements. At 120 days, 89% of VectorFlow catheters remained functional, compared with 45% of Ash Split Cath catheters (P = .046). The VectorFlow catheter was associated with 16% lower arterial pressures during dialysis (P = .009); mean blood flow rate was equivalent. On multivariate analysis, the risk of catheter failure was 13.3 times higher in the Ash Split Cath group compared with the VectorFlow group (P = .004). Left-sided catheters were also predictive of catheter failure (relative risk = 5.5; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: The VectorFlow catheter was associated with a significant increase in intervention-free catheter patency compared with the Ash Split Cath catheter, with equivalent flow at lower arterial pressures during dialysis.
Copyright © 2015 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26239895     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  2 in total

1.  Clinical and Regulatory Considerations for Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Douglas M Silverstein; Scott O Trerotola; Timothy Clark; Garth James; Wing Ng; Amy Dwyer; Marius C Florescu; Roman Shingarev; Stephen R Ash
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Hemodialysis Catheters: Update on Types, Outcomes, Designs and Complications.

Authors:  Husameddin El Khudari; Merve Ozen; Bridget Kowalczyk; Juri Bassuner; Ammar Almehmi
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.513

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.