Literature DB >> 26239848

A Need for Renewed and Cohesive US Policy on Cord Blood Banking.

Monica M Matsumoto1, Kirstin R W Matthews2.   

Abstract

Stem cells obtained from umbilical cord blood (CB) are used to treat more than 80 different diseases and are a standard treatment for many types of leukemias, lymphomas, myelodysplasias, and inherited immune system disorders. CB transplants have been carried out in humans for over 25 years, and hundreds of clinical trials are currently underway investigating CB's therapeutic potential for a wide range of disorders, including autism, diabetes, cerebral palsy, and spinal cord injury. Extensive storage facilities have been established in the United States and around the world to collect, test, and freeze CB for later use in medical procedures. However, a divide between two different banking models-public versus private-has emerged, presenting several policy challenges. While the Food and Drug Administration currently regulates CB storage and use in the United States, other state and federal guidelines on CB education, awareness, and ethical considerations remain variable, and no mandatory international guidelines exist. In addition, federal funding for an important CB collection initiative that specifically targets minority populations is set to expire by the end of FY2015. To help organize and coordinate efforts across the United States and other nations, policymakers should implement regulations for: high quality standards for both private and public CB banks, a commitment to ethical practices, and an investment in educational campaigns and training programs for all steps of the CB banking process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cord blood; Education; FDA; Legislation; Policy; Stem cell; United States

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26239848     DOI: 10.1007/s12015-015-9613-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep        ISSN: 2629-3277            Impact factor:   5.739


  9 in total

1.  Knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women with regard to collection, testing and banking of cord blood stem cells.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Kevin Gordon; Michiel Van den Hof; Shaureen Taweel; Françoise Baylis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Family-directed umbilical cord blood banking.

Authors:  Eliane Gluckman; Annalisa Ruggeri; Vanderson Rocha; Etienne Baudoux; Michael Boo; Joanne Kurtzberg; Kathy Welte; Cristina Navarrete; Suzanna M van Walraven
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Umbilical cord blood banking: beyond the public-private divide.

Authors:  Michelle A C O'Connor; Gabrielle Samuel; Christopher F C Jordens; Ian H Kerridge
Journal:  J Law Med       Date:  2012-03

4.  Knowledge about umbilical cord blood banking among Greek citizens.

Authors:  Louiza Z Karagiorgou; Maria-Nikoletta P Pantazopoulou; Nikolaos C Mainas; Apostolos I Beloukas; Anastasios G Kriebardis
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  Challenges in umbilical cord blood stem cell banking for stem cell reviews and reports.

Authors:  Karen Ballen
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  High acceptance rate of hybrid allogeneic-autologous umbilical cord blood banking among actual and potential Swiss donors.

Authors:  Anna-Margaretha Wagner; Werner Krenger; Eva Suter; Dorra Ben Hassem; Daniel V Surbek
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 7.  Umbilical cord blood transplantation: the first 25 years and beyond.

Authors:  Karen K Ballen; Eliane Gluckman; Hal E Broxmeyer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Pregnant women's knowledge and attitudes about stem cells and cord blood banking.

Authors:  H Dinç; N H Sahin
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.871

Review 9.  Umbilical cord blood banking: from personal donation to international public registries to global bioeconomy.

Authors:  Carlo Petrini
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2014-06-18
  9 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Biological Products: Cellular Therapy and FDA Approved Products.

Authors:  Ali Golchin; Tahereh Zarnoosheh Farahany
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  The construction of the evaluation system of nurses' post-training and the application of the system in 25 grade-A general hospitals in China.

Authors:  Linlin Jiao; Yuanda Sui; Guihua Yang; Pulin Wang; Qiaofeng Li; Junhong Chen; Lili Liu; Chunling Yang
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-10-14

Review 3.  Factors Influencing the Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Industry: An Evolving Treatment Landscape.

Authors:  Carla Dessels; Marco Alessandrini; Michael Sean Pepper
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 6.940

4.  A New Approach to Cerebral Palsy Treatment: Discussion of the Effective Components of Umbilical Cord Blood and its Mechanisms of Action.

Authors:  Yang Jiao; Xiao-Yan Li; Jing Liu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Stem Cell Therapies for Cerebral Palsy and Autism Spectrum Disorder-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Justyna Paprocka; Konrad Kaminiów; Sylwia Kozak; Karolina Sztuba; Ewa Emich-Widera
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.