Literature DB >> 26239280

Expected 10-year treatment cost of breast cancer detected within and outside a public screening program in Norway.

Tron A Moger1, Gudrun M W Bjørnelv2,3, Eline Aas2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The shift towards earlier stages of disease advancement at diagnosis when introducing mammography screening is expected to affect the treatment costs of breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected data on hospital resource use in Norway following a breast cancer diagnosis for the period 1 January, 2008 through 31 December, 2009 for women aged 50-69 years, diagnosed with breast cancer during the period 1 January, 1999 through 31 December, 2009. We estimated treatment costs using a function that included the probability of being at risk for receiving treatment, estimated by means of the Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: In total, 16,045 patients were included for the analyses among which 10.5 % died during the study period. The mean 10-year per-person treatment cost was €31,940 (95 % CI €31,030-32,880), and lower for cancers detected within the public screening program (€30,730) than for those detected elsewhere (€36,230). For ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and cancers in stages I thru IV, treatment costs were €15,740, €23,570, €46,550, €55,230 and €60,430, respectively. Interval cancers occurring within the screening program were generally more resource demanding than both cancers detected at screening or elsewhere.
CONCLUSIONS: Ten-year treatment costs increased by increasing stage at diagnosis. Patients whose cancer was detected within the public screening program had lower treatment costs than those detected elsewhere. Interval cancers had higher costs than others.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Long-term costs; Screening; Treatment costs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26239280     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-015-0719-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  22 in total

1.  Mammography activity in Norway 1983 to 2008.

Authors:  Elsebeth Lynge; Tonje Braaten; Sisse H Njor; Anne Helene Olsen; Merethe Kumle; Marit Waaseth; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Comparison of clinical-pathologic characteristics and outcomes of true interval and screen-detected invasive breast cancer among participants of a Canadian breast screening program: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Daniel Rayson; Jennifer Isabelle Payne; Mohamed Abdolell; Penny J Barnes; Rebecca F MacIntosh; Theresa Foley; Tallal Younis; Ariel Burns; Judy Caines
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Assessing the economic burden of breast cancer in a US managed care population.

Authors:  John J Barron; Ralph Quimbo; Prashant T Nikam; Mayur M Amonkar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Economic burden of cancer in the United States: estimates, projections, and future research.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Jennifer Lund; Deanna Kepka; Angela Mariotto
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Breast cancer stage cost analysis in a managed care population. Based on a presentation by Kenneth L. McDonough, MD, MS.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Cost of breast cancer treatment. A 4-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  A P Legorreta; R J Brooks; A N Leibowitz; L J Solin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-10-28

7.  Estimating the costs attributable to a disease with application to ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R Etzioni; N Urban; M Baker
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 8.  Subjective cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marleen J J Pullens; Jolanda De Vries; Jan A Roukema
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Lower costs of hospital treatment of breast cancer through a population-based mammography screening programme.

Authors:  Lea Kauhava; Pirjo Immonen-Räihä; Ilmo Parvinen; Hans Helenius; Anne Kaljonen; Osmo Räsänen; Liisa Pylkkänen; Pekka J Klemi
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.367

10.  Medicare payments from diagnosis to death for elderly cancer patients by stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  G F Riley; A L Potosky; J D Lubitz; L G Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  2 in total

1.  Experience using a portable X-ray system at the scene transported by a physician-staffed helicopter.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Omori; Youichi Yanagawa; Ken-Ichi Muramatsu; Hiroki Nagasawa; Ikuto Takeuchi; Shunsuke Madokoro; Kei Jitsuiki; Shoichiro Yatsu; Hiromichi Ohsaka; Kouhei Ishikawa
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2019-05-23

2.  Costs and Effects of Implementing Digital Tomosynthesis in a Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening Program: Predictions Using Results from the To-Be Trial in Norway.

Authors:  Tron Anders Moger; Åsne Holen; Berit Hanestad; Solveig Hofvind
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2022-07-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.