| Literature DB >> 26238963 |
Lydia P Kudina1, Regina E Andreeva2.
Abstract
In neuromuscular diseases, a fasciculation origin is disputed. In some reports, it was suggested that motor unit firing pattern alone is evidence for motoneuronal or axonal fasciculations; namely interspike intervals of approximately 5 ms (doublet intervals) provide evidence for the axonal firing. To clarify the reliability of the suggestion, we compared doublet intervals originated in motoneurons and their axons in healthy humans. For this aim, the H-reflex and M-response of single motor units were elicited during gentle voluntary muscle contractions. Peri-stimulus time histograms allowed reliable judgment about a doublet origin: motoneuronal (at the H-reflex latency) or axonal (at the M-response latency). Significant difference between motoneuronal and axonal doublet intervals was absent. It was concluded that doublet interval alone cannot be the reliable criterion for an axonal firing origin; additional evidences are needed for this conclusion, for example, the appearance of the F-wave. The approach may be used as an additional estimation of mechanisms underlying motor unit diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Axonal and motoneuronal double discharges; Fasciculation potentials; Human firing motor units; Interspike interval analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26238963 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-015-2354-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Sci ISSN: 1590-1874 Impact factor: 3.307