Literature DB >> 26238951

High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Clinical Results for a Median 8-Year Follow-Up.

Yasuo Yoshioka1, Osamu Suzuki2, Fumiaki Isohashi2, Yuji Seo2, Hirofumi Okubo2, Hiroko Yamaguchi2, Michio Oda2, Yuki Otani2, Iori Sumida2, Motohide Uemura3, Kazutoshi Fujita3, Akira Nagahara3, Takeshi Ujike3, Atsunari Kawashima3, Ken Yoshida4, Hideya Yamazaki5, Norio Nonomura3, Kazuhiko Ogawa2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present mature results of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as monotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1995 through 2012, 190 patients, 79 with intermediate-risk and 111 with high-risk prostate cancer, were treated with HDR-BT alone using 48 Gy/8 fractions, 54 Gy/9 fractions, or 45.5 Gy/7 fractions over 4 to 5 days. Neoadjuvant with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was administered to 139 patients, 35 intermediate- and 104 high-risk.
RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 92 months (range, 10-227 months), with a minimum of 2 years for surviving patients. Respective rates of cause-specific survival, overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and biochemical no evidence of disease for the intermediate-risk patients were 100%, 100%, 96%, and 93% at 5 years, and 100%, 96%, 91%, and 91% at 8 years. Corresponding rates for the high-risk patients were 97%, 93%, 84%, and 81% at 5 years, and 93%, 81%, 74%, and 77% at 8 years. The cumulative incidence of late grade 2 to 3 genitourinary toxicity was 5% at 5 years and 10% at 8 years, and that of late grade 3 was 0 at 5 years and 1% at 8 years. The cumulative incidence of late grade 2-3 gastrointestinal toxicity was 4% at 5 years and 6% at 8 years, and that of late grade 3 was 0 at 5 years and 2% at 8 years. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Our single-institution study with a median 8-year follow-up showed that HDR-BT as monotherapy was safe and effective for patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26238951     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.05.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  14 in total

Review 1.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy as salvage modality for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy : A systematic review.

Authors:  Georgios Chatzikonstantinou; Nikolaos Zamboglou; Claus Rödel; Eleni Zoga; Iosif Strouthos; Saeed Ahmed Butt; Nikolaos Tselis
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Two-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy within a single day combined with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: single institution experience and outcomes.

Authors:  Junyang Liu; Motoki Kaidu; Ryuta Sasamoto; Fumio Ayukawa; Nobuko Yamana; Hiraku Sato; Kensuke Tanaka; Gen Kawaguchi; Atsushi Ohta; Katsuya Maruyama; Eisuke Abe; Takashi Kasahara; Tsutomu Nishiyama; Yoshihiko Tomita; Hidefumi Aoyama
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Pre-implant magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound imaging in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: comparison of prostate volumes, craniocaudal extents, and contours.

Authors:  Simone Grisotto; Annamaria Cerrotta; Brigida Pappalardi; Mauro Carrara; Antonella Messina; Chiara Tenconi; Riccardo Valdagni; Carlo Fallai
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-08-31

Review 5.  High dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lucas C Mendez; Gerard C Morton
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-06

6.  Impact of different Ir-192 source models on dose calculations in high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Yuki Otani; Shigetoshi Shimamoto; Iori Sumida; Yutaka Takahashi; Shoji Tani; Tetsuya Oshima; Satoshi Onosaka; Fumiaki Isohashi; Keisuke Tamari; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-08-31

7.  Targeted Prostate Biopsy Gleason Score Heterogeneity and Implications for Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Shane Mesko; Leonard Marks; Omar Ragab; Shyamal Patel; Daniel A Margolis; D Jeffrey Demanes; Mitchell Kamrava
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.787

8.  169 Yb-based rotating shield brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Quentin Adams; Karolyn M Hopfensperger; Yusung Kim; Xiaodong Wu; Ryan T Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.506

9.  Brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer in the modern era: a comparison of patient-reported quality of life outcomes among different techniques.

Authors:  Tiffany M Morgan; Robert H Press; Patrick K Cutrell; Chao Zhang; Zhengja Chen; Sara Rahnema; Martin Sanda; John Pattaras; Pretesh R Patel; Ashesh B Jani; Peter J Rossi
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-12-28

10.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: long-term experience of Swedish single-center.

Authors:  Bengt Johansson; Johan Staby Olsén; Leif Karlsson; Erik Lundin; Bo Lennernäs
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.