Literature DB >> 26238724

Influenza vaccination type, live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) versus inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), received by children, United States, 2011-12 through 2013-14 influenza seasons.

Katherine E Kahn1, Tammy A Santibanez2, Yusheng Zhai3, James A Singleton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccines available for children in the United States include inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) and live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV). Objectives of this study were to quantify proportions of IIV and LAIV received by vaccinated children, and examine associations between vaccine type received and demographic characteristics.
METHODS: National Immunization Survey-Flu (NIS-Flu) parental reported data for the 2011-12 through 2013-14 influenza seasons were used to estimate proportions of vaccinated children 2-17 years who received IIV and LAIV. Tests of association between vaccination type and demographic variables were conducted using Wald chi-square tests and pair-wise comparison t-tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine variables independently associated with receipt of LAIV versus IIV.
RESULTS: In the 2013-14 season, 33.3% of vaccinated children received LAIV, similar to the proportion in the 2011-12 (32.2%) and 2012-13 (32.1%) seasons. Across all seasons studied, the strongest observed association was between vaccination type and child's age, with children 2-8 years (Adjusted Prevalence Ratio (95% confidence interval) [APR(95% CI)] 1.41(1.27-1.56), 1.46(1.34-1.59), and 1.50(1.38-1.63) for 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14) and 9-12 years (APR(95% CI) 1.37(1.23-1.54), 1.38(1.26-1.51), and 1.50(1.38-1.63) for 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14) being more likely to have received LAIV than children 13-17 years. Among those vaccinated, whites were more likely to have received LAIV compared with blacks (APR(95% CI) 1.19(1.05-1.35), 1.24(1.10-1.39), and 1.22(1.11-1.34) for 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14), and children living above poverty (annual income >$75,000) were more likely to have received LAIV than those living at or below poverty (APR(95% CI) 1.43(1.23-1.67), 1.13(1.02-1.26), and 1.16(1.06-1.28) for 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a baseline of the extent and patterns of LAIV uptake that can be used to measure the impact of relevant public health policy. Additional research is needed to investigate parental and provider preferences and barriers regarding LAIV. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child; Health surveys; Influenza vaccines; LAIV vaccine; Vaccination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26238724      PMCID: PMC4597891          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  29 in total

1.  Prevention and Control of Influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

Authors:  Nicole M Smith; Joseph S Bresee; David K Shay; Timothy M Uyeki; Nancy J Cox; Raymond A Strikas
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2006-07-28

2.  The underrecognized burden of influenza in young children.

Authors:  Katherine A Poehling; Kathryn M Edwards; Geoffrey A Weinberg; Peter Szilagyi; Mary Allen Staat; Marika K Iwane; Carolyn B Bridges; Carlos G Grijalva; Yuwei Zhu; David I Bernstein; Guillermo Herrera; Dean Erdman; Caroline B Hall; Ranee Seither; Marie R Griffin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Interpandemic influenza in the Houston area, 1974-76.

Authors:  W P Glezen; R B Couch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Increasing uptake of live attenuated influenza vaccine among children in the United States, 2008-2014.

Authors:  Loren Rodgers; Laura J Pabst; Sandra S Chaves
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  The Tecumseh Study of Respiratory Illness. IX. Occurence of influenza in the community, 1966--1971.

Authors:  A S Monto; F Kioumehr
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of live attenuated cold-adapted influenza vaccine, trivalent, with trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine in children and adolescents with asthma.

Authors:  Douglas M Fleming; Pietro Crovari; Ulrich Wahn; Timo Klemola; Yechiel Schlesinger; Alexangros Langussis; Knut Øymar; Maria Luz Garcia; Alain Krygier; Herculano Costa; Ulrich Heininger; Jean-Louis Pregaldien; Sheau-Mei Cheng; Jonathan Skinner; Ahmad Razmpour; Melanie Saville; William C Gruber; Bruce Forrest
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Impact of type A influenza on children: a retrospective study.

Authors:  J P Mullooly; W H Barker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States.

Authors:  William W Thompson; David K Shay; Eric Weintraub; Lynnette Brammer; Carolyn B Bridges; Nancy J Cox; Keiji Fukuda
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) -- United States, 2014-15 influenza season.

Authors:  Lisa A Grohskopf; Sonja J Olsen; Leslie Z Sokolow; Joseph S Bresee; Nancy J Cox; Karen R Broder; Ruth A Karron; Emmanuel B Walter
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  National, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years--United States, 2013.

Authors:  Laurie D Elam-Evans; David Yankey; Jenny Jeyarajah; James A Singleton; Robinette C Curtis; Jessica MacNeil; Susan Hariri
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does Choice of Influenza Vaccine Type Change Disease Burden and Cost-Effectiveness in the United States? An Agent-Based Modeling Study.

Authors:  Jay V DePasse; Kenneth J Smith; Jonathan M Raviotta; Eunha Shim; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Richard K Zimmerman; Shawn T Brown
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Do parents prefer inactivated or live attenuated influenza vaccine for their children?

Authors:  Tammy A Santibanez; Katherine E Kahn; Carolyn B Bridges
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine for U.S. Children: Live Attenuated and Inactivated Influenza Vaccine.

Authors:  Eunha Shim; Shawn T Brown; Jay DePasse; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Jonathan M Raviotta; Kenneth J Smith; Richard K Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.043

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.