Literature DB >> 26238336

Complications from first-trimester aspiration abortion: a systematic review of the literature.

Kari White1, Erin Carroll2, Daniel Grossman3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to examine the prevalence of minor and major complications following first-trimester aspiration abortion requiring medical or surgical intervention. STUDY
DESIGN: We searched PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for articles published between 1980 and April 2015 that reported on repeat aspiration, hemorrhage, infection, cervical/vaginal trauma, uterine perforation, abdominal surgery, hospitalization, anesthesia-related complications and death. We limited our review to studies that included ≥100 abortions performed by physicians in North America, Western Europe, Scandinavia and Australia/New Zealand. We compared the prevalence of complications that required additional interventions for abortions performed in office-based clinics and surgical center or hospital clinic settings.
RESULTS: From 11,369 articles retrieved, 57 studies met our inclusion criteria. Evidence from 36 studies suggests that ≤3.0% of procedures performed in any setting necessitates repeat aspiration. Hemorrhage not requiring transfusion occurred in 0-4.7% of office-based procedures and 0-4.1% of hospital-based procedures but was ≤1.0% in 23 studies. Major complications requiring intervention, including hemorrhage requiring transfusion and uterine perforation needing repair, occurred in ≤0.1% of procedures, and hospitalization was necessary in ≤0.5% of cases in most studies. Anesthesia-related complications occurred in ≤0.2% of procedures in six office-based studies and ≤0.5% of procedures performed in surgical centers or hospital-based clinics. No abortion-related deaths were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of first-trimester aspiration abortions that required interventions for minor and major complications was very low. Overall, the prevalence of major complications was similar across clinic contexts, indicating that this procedure can be safely performed in an office setting. IMPLICATIONS: Laws requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges or facilities to meet ambulatory surgical center standards would be unlikely to improve the safety of first-trimester aspiration abortion in office settings.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspiration abortion; Complications; First-trimester surgical abortion; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26238336     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  12 in total

1.  Abortion services in Canada: access and safety.

Authors:  Laura Schummers; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Women's Knowledge of and Support for Abortion Restrictions in Texas: Findings from a Statewide Representative Survey.

Authors:  Kari White; Joseph E Potter; Amanda J Stevenson; Liza Fuentes; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2016-04-15

3.  Does information about abortion safety affect Texas voters' opinions about restrictive laws? A randomized study.

Authors:  Kari White; Daniel Grossman; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Treatment Options After a Diagnosis of Early Miscarriage: Expectant, Medical, and Surgical.

Authors:  Thabea Musik; Juliane Grimm; Ingolf Juhasz-Böss; Elke Bäz
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  The effect of facility characteristics on patient safety, patient experience, and service availability for procedures in non-hospital-affiliated outpatient settings: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy F Berglas; Molly F Battistelli; Wanda K Nicholson; Mindy Sobota; Richard D Urman; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Recent advances in improving the effectiveness and reducing the complications of abortion.

Authors:  Sharon Cameron
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-12-02

7.  Could implementation of mifepristone address Canada's urban-rural abortion access disparity: a mixed-methods implementation study protocol.

Authors:  Wendy V Norman; Sarah Munro; Melissa Brooks; Courtney Devane; Edith Guilbert; Regina Renner; Tamil Kendall; Judith A Soon; Ashley Waddington; Marie-Soleil Wagner; Sheila Dunn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Miscarriage Treatment-Related Morbidities and Adverse Events in Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgery Centers, and Office-Based Settings.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Nancy Beam; Guodong Liu; Ushma D Upadhyay; Douglas L Leslie; Djibril Ba; Jennifer L Kerns
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.243

9.  The development of facility standards for common outpatient procedures and implications for the context of abortion.

Authors:  Nancy F Berglas; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Postpartum endometritis and infection following incomplete or complete abortion: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunization safety data.

Authors:  C E Rouse; L O Eckert; F M Muñoz; J S A Stringer; S Kochhar; L Bartlett; M Sanicas; D J Dudley; D M Harper; M Bittaye; L Meller; F Jehan; H C Maltezou; M Šubelj; A Bardaji; A Kachikis; R Beigi; M G Gravett
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.