Literature DB >> 26238247

A statistical perspective to visual masking.

Sevda Agaoglu1, Mehmet N Agaoglu1, Bruno Breitmeyer2, Haluk Ogmen3.   

Abstract

A stimulus (mask) reduces the visibility of another stimulus (target) when they are presented in close spatio-temporal vicinity of each other, a phenomenon called visual masking. Visual masking has been extensively studied to understand dynamics of information processing in the visual system. In this study, we adopted a statistical point of view, rather than a mechanistic one, to investigate how mask-related activities might influence target-related ones within the context of visual masking. We modeled the distribution of response errors of human observers in three different visual masking experiments, namely para-/meta-contrast masking, pattern masking by noise, and pattern masking by structure. We adopted statistical models, which have been used previously in studies of visual short-term memory, to capture response characteristics of observers under masking conditions. We tested the following scenarios: (i) mask activity may reduce a target's signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) without interfering with its encoding precision. (ii) Mask activity may "interfere" with the encoding of a target and cause decreased precision in observer's reports. (iii) Decreased performance due to masking may result from the confusion or "misbinding" of a mask's features with those of the target, when they are similar as in the case of pattern masking by structure. Our results show that in all three types of masking, the reduction of a target's SNR was the primary process whereby masking occurred. A significant decrease, correlated with masking strength, in the precision of the target's encoding was observed in para-/meta-contrast and pattern masking by structure, but not in pattern masking by noise. We interpret these findings as the mask reducing the target's SNR (i) by suppressing or interrupting the signal of the target in para-/meta-contrast, (ii) by increasing noise in pattern masking by noise, and (iii) a combination of the two in pattern masking by structure.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metacontract; Noise masking; Paracontrast; Statistical mixture models; Structure masking; Visual masking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26238247     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Masking reduces orientation selectivity in rat visual cortex.

Authors:  Dasuni S Alwis; Katrina L Richards; Nicholas S C Price
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Temporal crowding is a unique phenomenon reflecting impaired target encoding over large temporal intervals.

Authors:  Shira Tkacz-Domb; Yaffa Yeshurun
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-02

3.  Can (should) theories of crowding be unified?

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Visual crowding is a combination of an increase of positional uncertainty, source confusion, and featural averaging.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of Exogenous and Endogenous Attention on Metacontrast Masking.

Authors:  Sevda Agaoglu; Bruno Breitmeyer; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-10

6.  A closer look at four-dot masking of a foveated target.

Authors:  Marwan Daar; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Can rhythm-induced attention improve the perceptual representation?

Authors:  Asaf Elbaz; Yaffa Yeshurun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.