Literature DB >> 26237716

Where Do Agricultural Producers Get Safety and Health Information?

Sophia Chiu1, Marsha Cheyney, Marizen Ramirez, Fred Gerr.   

Abstract

There is little empirical guidance regarding communication sources and channels used and trusted by agricultural producers. The goal of this study was to characterize frequency of use and levels of trust in agricultural safety and health information sources and channels accessed by agricultural producers. A sample of 195 agricultural producers was surveyed at county fairs in Iowa. Information was collected about the frequency of use and level of trust in 14 information sources and channels. Associations between age, gender, and education level and use and trust of each information source or channel were estimated using logistic regression. The sample consisted of 72% men with a mean age of 50.1 (SD = 15.6) years. Newspaper and magazine articles were the most commonly used agricultural safety and health information source or channel; 77% (n = 140) of respondents reporting using them at least monthly. Among those reporting monthly or more frequent use, 75% reported trusting mostly or completely, compared with 58% using and 49% trusting the Internet. High levels of use and trust of newspaper and magazine articles did not vary significantly by age, gender, or education level. Age in the highest tertile (57-83 years) was marginally associated with lower odds of using, as well as using and trusting, all the information sources and channels studied except for medical clinics (use only: odds ratio [OR], 3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-15.64; use and trust: OR, 5.90, 95% CI, 0.91-38.42). These findings suggest that traditional media may be more effective than digital media for delivering agricultural safety and health information to agricultural producers. Medical clinics may be an untapped venue for communicating with older agricultural producers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; communication; health; safety

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26237716     DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1045156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agromedicine        ISSN: 1059-924X            Impact factor:   1.675


  2 in total

1.  Field Sanitation in U.S. Agriculture: Evidence from NAWS and Future Data Needs.

Authors:  Anita Alves Pena; Edward R Teather-Posadas
Journal:  J Agromedicine       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.675

2.  Who and How: Exploring the Preferred Senders and Channels of Mental Health Information for Wisconsin Farmers.

Authors:  Josie M Rudolphi; Richard Berg; Barbara Marlenga
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.