| Literature DB >> 26237416 |
Yukihiko Hiroshima1, Ming Zhao2, Yong Zhang2, Nan Zhang2, Ali Maawy3, Takashi Murakami1, Sumiyuki Mii4, Fuminari Uehara4, Mako Yamamoto4, Shinji Miwa4, Shuya Yano4, Masashi Momiyama5, Ryutaro Mori5, Ryusei Matsuyama5, Takashi Chishima5, Kuniya Tanaka5, Yasushi Ichikawa5, Michael Bouvet3, Itaru Endo5, Robert M Hoffman4.
Abstract
A patient-derived nude-mouse model of soft-tissue sarcoma has been established and treated in the following groups: (1) untreated controls; (2) gemcitabine (GEM) (80 mg/kg, ip, weekly, 3 weeks); (3) Pazopanib (100 mg/kg, orally, daily, 3 weeks) and (4) Salmonella typhimurium A1-R (5 × 10(7) CFU/body, ip, weekly, 3 weeks). The sarcoma was resistant to GEM (p = 0.879). Pazopanib tended to reduce the tumor volume compared to the untreated mice, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.115). S. typhimurium A1-R significantly inhibited tumor growth compared to the untreated mice (p = 0.001). S. typhimurium A1-R was the only effective treatment for the soft-tissue sarcoma nude mouse model among all treatments including a newly approved multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor; Pazopanib. These results suggest tumor-targeting S. typhimurium A1-R is a promising treatment for chemo-resistant soft-tissue sarcoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26237416 PMCID: PMC4523197 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Tumor histology.
A) Histology of the original patient sarcoma. B) Histology of the mouse grown sarcoma.
Fig 2Drug-response of soft tissue sarcoma in nude mice.
A representative image of nude mouse with the subcutaneous sarcoma in (A) the untreated mice; (B) GEM-treated; (C) Pazopanib-treated or (D) Salmonella typhimurium A1-R-treated. Scale bars: 10 mm. (E) Growth curves of the subcutaneous sarcoma’s treated with various drugs as described above. The values are mean relative tumor volume ± S.D. (bars) of five different tumors. ** p < 0.01, compared to no treatment group. (F-G) Representative cross-sections of excised subcutaneous tumors from the control and treatment groups with type of treatment indicated.
Fig 3Effect of treatment on histology in nude mice.
Histopathological responses to treatments were defined according to Evans’s grading scheme. (A) Treatment effect of control / no treatment was judged as grade I; (B) GEM treatment as grade I; (C) Pazopanib treatment as grade IIa; (D) S. typhimurium A1-R of a viable-like area as grade I and (E) S. typhimurium A1-R of a necrotic area as grade IV. Scale bars: 200 μm.
Fig 4Tumor-targeting of S. typhimurium A1-R.
Distribution of GFP-labeled S. typhimurium A1-R in tumors and organs. Representative images of GFP-labeled S. typhimurium A1-R bacteria culture isolated from the tumor and the normal organs (blood and liver) of the mice treated with S. typhimurium A1-R. GFP-labeled S. typhimurium A1-R were clearly detected only in the tumor. Only a few GFP-labeled S. typhimurium A1-R were detected in the liver and no GFP-labeled S. typhimurium A1-R was detected in blood. Scale bars: 10 mm.