Literature DB >> 2623730

IUDs are contraceptives, not abortifacients: a comment on research and belief.

I Sivin1.   

Abstract

No studies show that IUDs destroy developing embryos at rates higher than those found in women who are not using contraceptives. Studies of early pregnancy factors have not shown statistically significant differences in transient levels of hCG between IUD and control groups, a sign of early abortion. The small, careful study by Segal et al. (1985) found no transient rise of hCG in the IUD group. The highly sensitive assay in a larger sample of IUD users, by Wilcox et al. (1985), suggests that an upper limit of only 3 or 4 percent of ovulatory matings with an IUD in situ might show transient rises of hCG. The electron microscopy of Hurst et al. (1980) demonstrated the existence of leukocyte-ridden degenerating embryos in rhesus monkeys fitted with IUDs, but found the same percentage of degenerating embryos in the control group. In this respect, IUDs do no more than nature. The work of Hurst et al. also demonstrates the comparative rarity of fertilized ova in rhesus monkeys fitted with IUDs. Croxatto (1974) and Alvarez et al. (1988) showed that this was also true for humans. A variety of studies demonstrate that IUD use diminishes both the number of sperm reaching the oviduct and their capacity to fertilize ova. Depending on the type of IUD and the drug dose, sperm are hindered from penetrating cervical mucus, are phagocytized by leukocytes, are incapacitated, with head-tail separation in the presence of copper, and suffer other cytotoxic effects in the IUD-altered uterine fluid. In the oviducts of copper-IUD users, ova are found significantly less frequently than in controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2623730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Fam Plann        ISSN: 0039-3665


  5 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterials and Contraception: Promises and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Isabella Claure; Deborah Anderson; Catherine M Klapperich; Wendy Kuohung; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Systematic Review of Postfertilization Effects and Potential for Embryo Formation and Loss during the Use of Intrauterine Devices.

Authors:  Cara Buskmiller; Donna Harrison; Lester A Ruppersberger; Patrick P Yeung
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-06-27

3.  Safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the contraceptive and non-contraceptive uses of the LNG-IUS.

Authors:  Paula H Bednarek; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

4.  Opinions on conscientious objection to induced abortion among Finnish medical and nursing students and professionals.

Authors:  Petteri Nieminen; Saara Lappalainen; Pauliina Ristimäki; Markku Myllykangas; Anne-Mari Mustonen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 5.  A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Kirsten Black; Pamela Lotke; Kai J Buhling; Nikki B Zite
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.