| Literature DB >> 26236646 |
Durairajpandian Vishnuprabu1, Subramanian Geetha2, Lakkakula V K S Bhaskar3, Nitish R Mahapatra4, Arasambattu K Munirajan1.
Abstract
The KIF6 719Arg allele is an interesting genomic variant widely screened in various populations and is reported to be associated with the risk of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and statin treatment outcome. Recent population based clinical studies and large-scale meta-analyses pondered over the role of 719Arg variant in CAD risk and treatment response. We screened the KIF6 Trp719Arg polymorphism (rs20455) in south Indian CAD patients in a case-control approach. A total of 1042 samples (510 CAD patients and 532 controls) were screened for the KIF6 Trp719Arg SNP by TaqMan SNP genotyping assay, followed by meta-analysis of the genotype data of non-Europeans reports. The 719Arg risk genotype (GG) was observed in 29.6% of CAD cases and in 30.1% of controls with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.07 (95% CI: 0.76-1.50), p value = 0.709. No significant difference in the genotype frequency was observed between CAD and controls in both dominant model (AG + GG vs AA) and allelic model (719Arg vs 719Trp) with an OR of 1.11 (p = 0.491) and 1.03 (p = 0.767), respectively. The covariate analysis indicated that smoking & alcohol consumption increased the risk for MI among CAD patients. Meta-analysis showed that the KIF6 719Arg allele is not associated with CAD risk in both fixed effect (p = 0.515, OR = 1.023, 95% CI = 0.956-1.094) and random effect (p = 0.547, OR = 1.022, 95% CI = 0.953-1.096). The symmetrical shape of the Egger's funnel plots revealed that there is no publication bias. These results suggest that there is no association of KIF6 719Arg allele with CAD risk in South Indian population and the meta-analysis confirms the same among non-European population.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary Artery Disease; KIF6; Myocardial infarction; SNP; South Indian population; TaqMan genotyping; rs20455
Year: 2015 PMID: 26236646 PMCID: PMC4513186 DOI: 10.1016/j.mgene.2015.07.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Meta Gene ISSN: 2214-5400
Characteristics of CAD patients and controls.
| Characteristics | CAD (n = 510) | Control (n = 532) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Years ± SD) | 50.96 ± 10.99 | 42.69 ± 9.25 | |
| Male sex (%) | 87.3 | 68 | |
| BMI (kg/m2 ± SD) | 24.05 ± 3.55 | 24.56 ± 2.84 | |
| Smokers (%) | 57 | 9.3 | |
| HR (BPM ± SD) | 79.95 ± 12.47 | 76.94 ± 7.62 | |
| SBP (mm Hg ± SD) | 127.41 ± 20.03 | 121.12 ± 9.47 | |
| DBP (mm Hg ± SD) | 82.09 ± 11.69 | 74.84 ± 6.67 | |
| RBS | 131.69 ± 63.55 | 103.45 ± 28.02 | |
| Na+ | 135.57 ± 5.75 | 139.06 ± 2.35 | |
| K+ | 3.86 ± 1.95 | 4.12 ± 1.83 | 0.053 |
| UREA | 27.89 ± 8.93 | 20.79 ± 5.93 | |
| CREA | 1.04 ± 0.23 | 0.94 ± 0.24 | |
| TC | 174.74 ± 39.77 | 174.78 ± 33.78 | 0.990 |
| TGL | 137.24 ± 55.53 | 128.80 ± 65.86 | 0.198 |
| HDL | 38.96 ± 6.10 | 38.16 ± 12.41 | 0.578 |
| LDL | 130.83 ± 32.30 | 105.35 ± 27.97 |
All the quantitative variables were represented in mean ± standard deviation.
BMI: Body mass index; HR: Heart rate; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; RBS: Random blood sugar; Na+: Sodium electrolyte; K+: Potassium electrolyte; CREA: Creatinine; TC: Total cholesterol; TGL: triglyceride; HDL: High density lipoprotein; LDL: Low density lipoprotien.
Units: kg/m2: Kilogram per meter square; BPM: Beats per minute; mm Hg: millimeters of mercury; mEq/L: Milliequivalents per liter; mg/dL: Milligram per deciliter.
p-values were calculated by Student's t-test and a value of < 0.05 is considered significant and highlighted in bold.
Represents Serum biochemical values.
KIF6 Trp719Arg genotypes and alleles frequencies in South Indian CAD patients and controls.
| CAD (n = 510) (percentage frequency) | Control (n = 532) (percentage frequency) | OR | 95% CI | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | AA (Trp/Trp) | 107 (21.0) | 121 (22.7) | Reference | ||
| AG (Trp/Arg) | 252 (49.4) | 251 (47.2) | 1.14 | 0.83–1.55 | 0.427 | |
| GG (Arg/Arg) | 151 (29.6) | 160 (30.1) | 1.07 | 0.76–1.50 | 0.709 | |
| Dominant model | AG + GG | 403 (79) | 411 (77.3) | 1.11 | 0.83–1.49 | 0.491 |
| Allelic model | A | 466 (45.7) | 493 (46.3) | Reference | ||
| G | 554 (54.3) | 571 (53.7) | 1.03 | 0.86–1.22 | 0.767 | |
| HWE χ2 | 0.0204 | 1.2965 | ||||
| HWE p-value | 0.922 | 0.237 | ||||
OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence intervals; p-value < 0.05 considered significant, HWE χ2: Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium chi-square; HWE p-value > 0.05 represents sampling neutrality.
Covariate analysis among CAD with and without MI cases.
| Covariates (n) | CAD (n) | MI (n) | OR (95% CI) | p-Value (df) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA (Trp/Trp) | 27 | 77 | Ref | 0.097 (2) | |
| AG (Trp/Arg) | 62 | 175 | 0.990 (0.585–1.674) | ||
| GG (Arg/Arg) | 24 | 118 | 1.724 (0.927–3.206) | ||
| Sex (483) | Male | 94 | 328 | 1.579 (0.876–2.843) | 0.128 (1) |
| Female | 19 | 42 | Ref | ||
| Age (483) | ≤ 45 years | 26 | 132 | 0.539 (0.331–0.877) | |
| ≥ 46 years | 87 | 238 | Ref | ||
| Smoking status (407) | Smoker | 35 | 195 | 3.394 (2.119–5.434) | |
| Non-smoker | 67 | 110 | Ref | ||
| Alcoholic status (391) | Alcoholic | 33 | 154 | 2.232 (1.385–3.596) | |
| Non-alcoholic | 66 | 138 | Ref | ||
| Diabetes (379) | Diabetic | 51 | 123 | 0.758 (0.479–1.197) | 0.235 (1) |
| Non-diabetic | 49 | 156 | Ref | ||
| Hypertension (328) | Hypertensive | 52 | 85 | 0.447 (0.274–0.728) | |
| Non-hypertensive | 41 | 150 | Ref | ||
| Heart rate (471) | Normal (< 81) | 60 | 224 | Ref | 0.454 (1) |
| High (> 82) | 45 | 142 | 0.845 (0.544–1.312) | ||
| Systolic blood pressure (481) | Normal (< 120) | 37 | 184 | Ref | |
| High (> 120) | 74 | 186 | 0.505 (0.324–0.788) | ||
| Diastolic blood pressure (482) | Normal (< 80) | 67 | 276 | Ref | 0.005 (1) |
| High (> 80) | 44 | 95 | 0.524 (0.336–0.819) | ||
Total of 483 patients were known for their MI status, which is considered for covariate analysis. OR = Odds ratio calculated by logistic regression analysis for each covariate considering CAD as non-severe and MI as severe form of the disease. p-value < 0.05 considered significant. df = degrees of freedom. (MI is considered as the severe form of CAD. n = number of patients with available clinical data, units for heart rate: beats per minute, systolic and diastolic blood pressure: millimeters of mercury).
Fig. 1Forest plot of KIF6 Trp719Arg SNP among non-European CAD vs controls.
Forest plot generated using comprehensive meta-analysis software both allelic and dominant models were analyzed by both fixed and random effects. Odds ratio, upper and lower limits of 95% confidence intervals, z-value and p-values were provided in the plot.
Measures of publication bias in allelic and dominant models.
| Publication bias test | Allelic model | Dominant model |
|---|---|---|
| Observed studies p value | 0.84877 | 0.37532 |
| Observed studies Z values | 0.19068 | − 0.88656 |
| Number of missing studies to bring p > alpha | 0.0000 | 0.00000 |
| OR | 1.02253 | 1.01334 |
| Kendall' tau | − 0.20000 | − 0.40000 |
| One-tailed | 0.31210 | 0.16359 |
| Two-tailed | 0.62421 | 0.32719 |
| Intercept value | − 1.16735 | − 2.28394 |
| ‘t’ value | 1.01659 | 1.26155 |
| One-tailed | 0.19210 | 0.14814 |
| Two-tailed | 0.38420 | 0.29628 |
| Degrees of freedom (df) | 3 | 3 |
Fig. 2Egger's funnel plot representing publication bias in allelic and dominant models.
The asymmetry of the funnel plot assessed by Egger's linear regression test and graphed by plotting log odds ratio in X-axis and standard error in Y-axis.