| Literature DB >> 26236538 |
Laura Rimkiene1, Liudas Ivanauskas1, Asta Kubiliene1, Konradas Vitkevicius1, Guoda Kiliuviene1, Valdas Jakstas2.
Abstract
The aim of the present work was to improve and validate the HPLC-CUPRAC postcolumn method for the evaluation of active antioxidant markers from the acetonic extracts of Ginkgo biloba leaves. Improvement of the HPLC online assay was performed by evaluating the suitable loop temperature, the reaction loop length, and the impact of flow rate. Separation of the analytes was performed by the HPLC method on an ACE C18 analytical column using a gradient elution program. The separated antioxidant markers in the extracts reacted with copper(II)-neocuproine (Cu(II)-Nc) reagent in the postcolumn reaction coil. The reagent was reduced by antioxidants to the copper(I)-neocuproine (Cu(I)-Nc) chelate with a maximum absorption at 450 nm. Validation experiments confirmed sufficient precision, sensitivity, and effectiveness of the corresponding method, which could be used for further evaluations of active antioxidant compounds in similar plant materials.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26236538 PMCID: PMC4509493 DOI: 10.1155/2015/280167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1Combined chromatograms of chromatographic elution of a mixture of flavonoid standards (a), Ginkgo biloba L. leaf extract (b), and postcolumn reaction with CUPRAC with Ginkgo biloba L. leaf extract (c). For exact compound refer to Table 2.
Figure 2Dependence of peak height-to-baseline noise ratio (S/N) on CUPRAC solution flow rate. The following standards were used: quercetin, 0.074 mg mL−1; kaempferol, 0.084 mg mL−1; isorhamnetin, 0.085 mg mL−1 (injected volume: 10 μL; λ = 370 nm).
Figure 3Signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios determined for quercetin, kaempferol, and isorhamnetin at different lengths of the reaction loops. ∗ indicates the significant differences at p < 0.05.
Validation characteristics of the CUPRAC postcolumn assay.
| Standards | Intraday RSD (%) ( | Interday RSD (%) ( |
| Regression equation | LOD ( | LOQ ( | Linearity range ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trolox | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.999 |
| 0.52 | 2.00 | 0.59–605 |
| Quercetin | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.998 |
| 0.95 | 3.18 | 4.6–74 |
| Kaempferol | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.996 |
| 0.66 | 2.22 | 5.2–84 |
| Isorhamnetin | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.991 |
| 2.37 | 7.92 | 5.3–85 |
RSD: relative standard deviation, R 2: correlation coefficient; LOD: limit of detection; LOQ: limit of quantitation.
TEAC values (µmol g−1 of dry weight) of Ginkgo biloba L. leaf in CUPRAC postcolumn assay.
| Peak number | Analytes | Cultivation source | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 | Sample 6 | Sample 7 | ||
| 1 | Quercetin | 13.7 | 6.79 ± 0.12b | 11.19 ± 0.2c | 3.04 ± 0.04a | 12.22 ± 0.18d | 19.50 ± 0.1f | 3.12 ± 0.04a | 13.74 ± 0.18e |
| 2 | Kaempferol | 19.2 | 2.48 ± 0.05b | 2.40 ± 0.1b | 1.44 ± 0.03a | 3.12 ± 0.04c | 5.59 ± 0.3e | 1.68 ± 0.01a | 3.98 ± 0.05d |
| 3 | Isorhamnetin | 20.4 | nd | 0.37 ± 0.01bc | 0.26 ± 0.01a | 0.40 ± 0.01cd | 0.90 ± 0.03e | 0.44 ± 0.02d | 0.32 ± 0.01b |
| Total | 9.27 ± 0.16b | 13.96 ± 0.30c | 4.74 ± 0.08a | 15.74 ± 0.25d | 25.99 ± 0.42f | 5.24 ± 0.07a | 18.04 ± 0.27e | ||
T : retention time; nd: not detected.
Notes. (1) Averages marked in different letters in the lines show statistically significant difference (at p < 0.05).
(2) Values are expressed as mean quantities with standard deviation.