Literature DB >> 26235967

Prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension according to the number of office blood pressure measurements.

E Vinyoles1, M Camafort2, M Domenech2, A Coca2, J Sobrino3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: The reported prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) varies because many studies are not comparable as they use different measurement methodologies. To evaluate the influence of the number of office blood pressure readings on the prevalence of MUCH we conducted a cross-sectional, multicenter study in treated hypertensive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study in 33 Spanish hospital-based hypertension units, involving 35 investigators and 12 Autonomous Communities. Six blood pressure readings and a 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were performed in treated hypertensive patients. The means of the first 3 readings (P123), the 2nd, 3rd and 4th readings (P234), the 3rd, 4th and 5th readings (P345) and the last 3 readings (P456) were compared with mean 24-h blood pressure. MUCH was defined as office blood pressure <140/90mmHg and 24-h blood pressure ≥130/80mmHg, considering the first 3 readings (MUCH123), the 2nd, 3rd and 4th readings (MUCH234), the 3rd, 4th and 5th readings (MUCH345) and the last 3 readings (MUCH456).
RESULTS: We included 498 hypertensive patients. Mean (standard deviation) office blood pressure measurements were: (P123) 141(18)/82(11); (P234) 139(17)/81(11); (P345) 138(17)/81(11) and (P456) 137(16)/80(10) mmHg. Mean 24-h blood pressure was 127(13.8)/75(9.5) mmHg. The correlation coefficients between ambulatory and office systolic/diastolic blood pressure were (P123):0.48/0.50; (P234):0.50/0.52; (P345):0.50/0.54; and (P456):0.50/0.55 (p<0.001, all). The prevalences of MUCH123, MUCH234, MUCH345 and MUCH456 were 14.5%, 18.9%, 19.5% and 21.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MUCH diagnosis depends on the serial office blood pressure readings, being much higher for the last three blood pressure readings. Discarding the first and second office blood pressure measures seems to be the most accurate method for diagnosing MUCH.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hipertensión arterial no controlada; Hipertensión enmascarada; Masked hypertension; Masked uncontrolled hypertension; Medición de la presión arterial en consulta; Office blood pressure measurement

Year:  2015        PMID: 26235967     DOI: 10.1016/j.rce.2015.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Clin Esp (Barc)        ISSN: 2254-8874


  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of manual office blood pressure measurement in ambulatory hypertensive patients in Korea.

Authors:  Sehun Kim; Jin Joo Park; Seung-Ah Lee; Youngjin Cho; Yeonyee E Yoon; Il-Young Oh; Chang-Hwan Yoon; Jung-Won Suh; Young-Seok Cho; Tae-Jin Youn; Goo-Yeong Cho; In-Ho Chae; Hae-Young Lee; Jinho Shin; Sungha Park; Dong-Ju Choi
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 2.  Current applications and limitations of European guidelines on blood pressure measurement: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Giuliano Tocci; Barbara Citoni; Giulia Nardoianni; Ilaria Figliuzzi; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.472

3.  Nocturnal blood pressure patterns and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with masked hypertension.

Authors:  Vivianne Presta; Ilaria Figliuzzi; Michela D'Agostino; Barbara Citoni; Francesca Miceli; Francesca Simonelli; Roberta Coluccia; Maria Beatrice Musumeci; Andrea Ferrucci; Massimo Volpe; Giuliano Tocci
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.