Literature DB >> 26234768

Extinction in a hyperdiverse endemic Hawaiian land snail family and implications for the underestimation of invertebrate extinction.

Claire Régnier1, Philippe Bouchet1, Kenneth A Hayes2,3, Norine W Yeung3,4,5, Carl C Christensen4,5, Daniel J D Chung5, Benoît Fontaine1, Robert H Cowie4.   

Abstract

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List includes 832 species listed as extinct since 1600, a minuscule fraction of total biodiversity. This extinction rate is of the same order of magnitude as the background rate and has been used to downplay the biodiversity crisis. Invertebrates comprise 99% of biodiversity, yet the status of a negligible number has been assessed. We assessed extinction in the Hawaiian land snail family Amastridae (325 species, IUCN lists 33 as extinct). We did not use the stringent IUCN criteria, by which most invertebrates would be considered data deficient, but a more realistic approach comparing historical collections with modern surveys and expert knowledge. Of the 325 Amastridae species, 43 were originally described as fossil or subfossil and were assumed to be extinct. Of the remaining 282, we evaluated 88 as extinct and 15 as extant and determined that 179 species had insufficient evidence of extinction (though most are probably extinct). Results of statistical assessment of extinction probabilities were consistent with our expert evaluations of levels of extinction. Modeling various extinction scenarios yielded extinction rates of 0.4-14.0% of the amastrid fauna per decade. The true rate of amastrid extinction has not been constant; generally, it has increased over time. We estimated a realistic average extinction rate as approximately 5%/decade since the first half of the nineteenth century. In general, oceanic island biotas are especially susceptible to extinction and global rate generalizations do not reflect this. Our approach could be used for other invertebrates, especially those with restricted ranges (e.g., islands), and such an approach may be the only way to evaluate invertebrates rapidly enough to keep up with ongoing extinction.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  Amastridae; Hawaii; Hawái; IUCN Red List; Lista Roja UICN; conservation bias; conservation status; estado de conservación; extinción; extinction; impedimento taxonómico; sesgo de conservación; taxonomic impediment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26234768     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  5 in total

1.  Insights into the Evolutionary History of an Extinct South American Freshwater Snail Based on Historical DNA.

Authors:  Roberto E Vogler; Ariel A Beltramino; Ellen E Strong; Alejandra Rumi; Juana G Peso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  No evidence of critical slowing down in two endangered Hawaiian honeycreepers.

Authors:  Jessica C Rozek; Richard J Camp; J Michael Reed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Biological Control of Pest Non-Marine Molluscs: A Pacific Perspective on Risks to Non-Target Organisms.

Authors:  Carl C Christensen; Robert H Cowie; Norine W Yeung; Kenneth A Hayes
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Revision of Partulidae (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora) of Palau, with description of a new genus for an unusual ground-dwelling species.

Authors:  John Slapcinsky; Fred Kraus
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 1.546

5.  A comparative analysis of terrestrial arthropod assemblages from a relict forest unveils historical extinctions and colonization differences between two oceanic islands.

Authors:  Mário Boieiro; Thomas J Matthews; Carla Rego; Luis Crespo; Carlos A S Aguiar; Pedro Cardoso; François Rigal; Isamberto Silva; Fernando Pereira; Paulo A V Borges; Artur R M Serrano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.