Literature DB >> 26234554

Safety and efficacy of diaphragm pacing in patients with respiratory insufficiency due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (DiPALS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive ventilation is part of the standard of care for treatment of respiratory failure in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The NeuRx RA/4 Diaphragm Pacing System has received Humanitarian Device Exemption approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of respiratory failure in patients with ALS. We aimed to establish the safety and efficacy of diaphragm pacing with this system in patients with respiratory muscle weakness due to ALS.
METHODS: We undertook a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at seven specialist ALS and respiratory centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older with laboratory supported probable, clinically probable, or clinically definite ALS; stable riluzole treatment for at least 30 days; and respiratory insufficiency. We randomly assigned participants (1:1), via a centralised web-based randomisation system with minimisation that balanced patients for age, sex, forced vital capacity, and bulbar function, to receive either non-invasive ventilation plus pacing with the NeuRx RA/4 Diaphragm Pacing System or non-invasive ventilation alone. Patients, carers, and outcome assessors were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered, ISRCTN number 53817913.
FINDINGS: Between Dec 5, 2011, and Dec 18, 2013, we randomly assigned 74 participants to receive either non-invasive ventilation alone (n=37) or non-invasive ventilation plus diaphragm pacing (n=37). On Dec 18, 2013, the Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee (DMEC) recommended suspension of recruitment on the basis of overall survival figures. Randomly assigned participants continued as per the study protocol until June 23, 2014, when the DMEC advised discontinuation of pacing in all patients. Follow-up assessments continued until the planned end of the study in December, 2014. Survival was shorter in the non-invasive ventilation plus pacing group than in the non-invasive ventilation alone group (median 11·0 months [95% CI 8·3-13·6] vs 22·5 months [13·6-not reached]; adjusted hazard ratio 2·27, 95% CI 1·22-4·25; p=0·009). 28 (76%) patients died in the pacing group and 19 (51%) patients died in the non-invasive ventilation alone group. We recorded 162 adverse events (5·9 events per person-year) in the pacing group, of which 46 events were serious, compared with 81 events (2·5 events per person-year) in the non-invasive ventilation alone group, of which 31 events were serious.
INTERPRETATION: Addition of diaphragm pacing to standard care with non-invasive ventilation was associated with decreased survival in patients with ALS. Our results suggest that diaphragmatic pacing should not be used as a routine treatment for patients with ALS in respiratory failure. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme; the Motor Neurone Disease Association of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
Copyright © 2015 DiPALS Study Group Collaborators. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26234554     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00152-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  22 in total

1.  Motor neuron disease: Diaphragm pacing is associated with reduced survival in ALS patients with respiratory insufficiency.

Authors:  Heather Wood
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Update on clinical trials in home mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Luke E Hodgson; Patrick B Murphy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Supportive and symptomatic management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Esther V Hobson; Christopher J McDermott
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 4.  Considerations for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Clinical Trial Design.

Authors:  Christina N Fournier
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.088

5.  Methods and Applications in Respiratory Physiology: Respiratory Mechanics, Drive and Muscle Function in Neuromuscular and Chest Wall Disorders.

Authors:  Nina Patel; Kelvin Chong; Ahmet Baydur
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Diaphragm pacing implantation in Japan for a patient with cervical spinal cord injury: A case report.

Authors:  Kazuya Yokota; Muneaki Masuda; Ryuichiro Koga; Masatoshi Uemura; Tadashi Koga; Yasuharu Nakashima; Osamu Kawano; Takeshi Maeda
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Diaphragm pacing: the state of the art.

Authors:  Francoise Le Pimpec-Barthes; Antoine Legras; Alex Arame; Ciprian Pricopi; Jean-Claude Boucherie; Alain Badia; Capucine Morelot Panzini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Diaphragm Dysfunction: Diagnostic Approaches and Management Strategies.

Authors:  Bruno-Pierre Dubé; Martin Dres
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Diaphragm pacing and motor neurone disease: lessons for all?

Authors:  Mark W Elliott
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 10.  Recent advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Nilo Riva; Federica Agosta; Christian Lunetta; Massimo Filippi; Angelo Quattrini
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.