Literature DB >> 26234440

How many markers are enough? Factors influencing parentage testing in different livestock populations.

E M Strucken1, S H Lee2, H K Lee3, K D Song3, J P Gibson1, C Gondro1.   

Abstract

Reliability of parentage test panels is usually based on its power to exclude wrong parentage assignments based on allele frequencies. We evaluated the rates of false exclusions and inclusions in parentage assignments, and how these results are affected by allele frequencies, panel sizes and the number of allowed mismatches. We also evaluated the reliability of parentage testing by comparing populations with distinct genetic backgrounds using pure and composite families of cattle and sheep. Allowing for 1% genotype mismatches in true parent-offspring relations provided the best compromise between false-positive and false-negative assignments. Pure breeds needed at least 200-210 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers to correctly assign relations, but between 700 and 890 markers to avoid assigning incorrect relationships. Composite breeds needed between 220 (sheep) and 500 (cattle) markers for correct assignment; 680 (cattle) to 4400 (sheep) SNPs were needed to eliminate false-positive assignments. Allowing 0% genotype mismatches decreased false-positive but increased false-negative assignments, whilst a higher threshold of 2% showed the opposite effects. Panels with high minor allele frequencies (0.35-0.45) provided the best chance for correct parentage resolutions requiring fewer markers. Further, we propose that a dynamic threshold would allow adapting to population specific error rates. A comparison to the performance of the official International Society for Animal Genetics SNP panel for cattle and a recently published SNP panel for sheep showed that randomly selected markers performed only slightly worse for the applied parentage test based on opposing homozygotes. This suggests that even with carefully selected panels, only marginal assignment improvements are obtainable for a particular number of SNPs. The main point for improvement is the number of markers used. We recommend using at least 200 SNP markers for parentage testing if the aim is to reduce false-negative results. To fully exclude false positives at least 700 markers are required.
© 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allele frequency; cross-bred; genotyping error; mismatch; opposing homozygotes; panel size

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26234440     DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  18 in total

1.  Development of a SNP panel dedicated to parentage assignment in French sheep populations.

Authors:  F Tortereau; C R Moreno; G Tosser-Klopp; B Servin; J Raoul
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.797

2.  Using genomic relationship likelihood for parentage assignment.

Authors:  Kim E Grashei; Jørgen Ødegård; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  SNP Data Quality Control in a National Beef and Dairy Cattle System and Highly Accurate SNP Based Parentage Verification and Identification.

Authors:  Matthew C McClure; John McCarthy; Paul Flynn; Jennifer C McClure; Emma Dair; D K O'Connell; John F Kearney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 4.  Genetic Improvement in South African Livestock: Can Genomics Bridge the Gap Between the Developed and Developing Sectors?

Authors:  Esté van Marle-Köster; Carina Visser
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Comparison of economic returns among genetic evaluation strategies in a 2-tiered Charolais-sired beef cattle production system.

Authors:  Justin W Buchanan; Michael D MacNeil; Randall C Raymond; Ashley R Nilles; Alison Louise Van Eenennaam
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Evaluation of 17 microsatellite markers for parentage testing and individual identification of domestic yak (Bos grunniens).

Authors:  Jie Pei; Pengjia Bao; Min Chu; Chunnian Liang; Xuezhi Ding; Hongbo Wang; Xiaoyun Wu; Xian Guo; Ping Yan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Pedigree reconstruction and distant pairwise relatedness estimation from genome sequence data: A demonstration in a population of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Lauren E Petty; Kathrine Phillippi-Falkenstein; H Michael Kubisch; Muthuswamy Raveendran; R Alan Harris; Eric J Vallender; Chad D Huff; Rudolf P Bohm; Jeffrey Rogers; Jennifer E Below
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Recent development of allele frequencies and exclusion probabilities of microsatellites used for parentage control in the German Holstein Friesian cattle population.

Authors:  Bertram Brenig; Ekkehard Schütz
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Genetic tests for estimating dairy breed proportion and parentage assignment in East African crossbred cattle.

Authors:  Eva M Strucken; Hawlader A Al-Mamun; Cecilia Esquivelzeta-Rabell; Cedric Gondro; Okeyo A Mwai; John P Gibson
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 10.  Genomic Tools and Selective Breeding in Molluscs.

Authors:  Christopher M Hollenbeck; Ian A Johnston
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.