Literature DB >> 26234219

Persistent contamination on colonoscopes and gastroscopes detected by biologic cultures and rapid indicators despite reprocessing performed in accordance with guidelines.

Cori L Ofstead1, Harry P Wetzler2, Evan M Doyle2, Catherine K Rocco2, Kavel H Visrodia3, Todd H Baron4, Pritish K Tosh5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pathogens have been transmitted via flexible endoscopes that were reportedly reprocessed in accordance with guidelines.
METHODS: Researchers observed reprocessing activities to ensure guideline compliance in a large gastrointestinal endoscopy unit. Contamination was assessed immediately after bedside cleaning, manual cleaning, high-level disinfection, and overnight storage via visual inspection, aerobic cultures, and tests for adenosine triphosphate (ATP), protein, carbohydrate, and hemoglobin.
RESULTS: All colonoscopes and gastroscopes were reprocessed in accordance with guidelines during the study. Researchers collected and tested samples during 60 encounters with 15 endoscopes. Viable microbes were recovered from bedside-cleaned (92%), manually cleaned (46%), high-level disinfected (64%), and stored (9%) endoscopes. Rapid indicator tests detected contamination (protein, carbohydrate, hemoglobin, or ATP) above benchmarks on bedside-cleaned (100%), manually cleaned (92%), high-level disinfected (73%), and stored (82%) endoscopes. Visible residue was never observed on endoscopes, but it was often seen on materials used to sample endoscopes. Seven endoscopes underwent additional reprocessing in response to positive rapid indicators. Control endoscope channels were free of biologic residue and viable microbes.
CONCLUSION: Despite reprocessing in accordance with US guidelines, viable microbes and biologic debris persisted on clinically used gastrointestinal endoscopes, suggesting current reprocessing guidelines are not sufficient to ensure successful decontamination.
Copyright © 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscope; Endoscope reprocessing; Epidemiology; Gastrointestinal endoscopy; High-level disinfection; Reprocessing medical devices

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26234219     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  9 in total

1.  Rate and impact of duodenoscope contamination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara Larsen; Rasmus Vinther Russell; Lotte Klinten Ockert; Stephen Spanos; Helena Strømstad Travis; Lars Holger Ehlers; Anders Mærkedahl
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-07-15

2.  A pilot study on using chlorine dioxide gas for disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes.

Authors:  Ying Yi; Li-Mei Hao; Shu-Ren Ma; Jin-Hui Wu; Tao Wang; Song Lin; Zong-Xing Zhang; Jian-Cheng Qi
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Monitoring of endoscope reprocessing with an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence method.

Authors:  Nina Parohl; Doris Stiefenhöfer; Sabine Heiligtag; Henning Reuter; Dana Dopadlik; Frank Mosel; Guido Gerken; Alexander Dechêne; Evelyn Heintschel von Heinegg; Christoph Jochum; Jan Buer; Walter Popp
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2017-03-27

Review 4.  Duodenoscope-associated infection prevention: A call for evidence-based decision making.

Authors:  Cori L Ofstead; Brandy L Buro; Krystina M Hopkins; John E Eiland; Harry P Wetzler; David R Lichtenstein
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-11-17

5.  Morphological bactericidal fast-acting effects of peracetic acid, a high-level disinfectant, against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in tubing.

Authors:  T Chino; Y Nukui; Y Morishita; K Moriya
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.887

Review 6.  Outbreaks in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Geeta Sood; Trish M Perl
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.982

7.  Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing.

Authors:  Su Ma; Lili Feng; Ziyi Jiang; Xian Gao; Xisha Long; Shaonan Zhuang; Wenxia Ding; Taiyao Chen; Zhaoshen Li; Lingjuan Zhang; Huijun Xi; Hongzhi Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Disinfection and Sterilization in Health Care Facilities: An Overview and Current Issues.

Authors:  William A Rutala; David J Weber
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.982

9.  Microbiological Surveillance of Endoscopes in a Southern Italian Transplantation Hospital: A Retrospective Study from 2016 to 2019.

Authors:  Valentina Marchese; Daniele Di Carlo; Gaetano Fazio; Santi Mauro Gioè; Angelo Luca; Rossella Alduino; Monica Rizzo; Fabio Tuzzolino; Francesco Monaco; Pier Giulio Conaldi; Bruno Douradinha; Giuseppina Di Martino
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.