Cori L Ofstead1, Harry P Wetzler2, Evan M Doyle2, Catherine K Rocco2, Kavel H Visrodia3, Todd H Baron4, Pritish K Tosh5. 1. Ofstead & Associates, Saint Paul, MN; Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: cori@ofsteadinsights.com. 2. Ofstead & Associates, Saint Paul, MN. 3. Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. 5. Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pathogens have been transmitted via flexible endoscopes that were reportedly reprocessed in accordance with guidelines. METHODS: Researchers observed reprocessing activities to ensure guideline compliance in a large gastrointestinal endoscopy unit. Contamination was assessed immediately after bedside cleaning, manual cleaning, high-level disinfection, and overnight storage via visual inspection, aerobic cultures, and tests for adenosine triphosphate (ATP), protein, carbohydrate, and hemoglobin. RESULTS: All colonoscopes and gastroscopes were reprocessed in accordance with guidelines during the study. Researchers collected and tested samples during 60 encounters with 15 endoscopes. Viable microbes were recovered from bedside-cleaned (92%), manually cleaned (46%), high-level disinfected (64%), and stored (9%) endoscopes. Rapid indicator tests detected contamination (protein, carbohydrate, hemoglobin, or ATP) above benchmarks on bedside-cleaned (100%), manually cleaned (92%), high-level disinfected (73%), and stored (82%) endoscopes. Visible residue was never observed on endoscopes, but it was often seen on materials used to sample endoscopes. Seven endoscopes underwent additional reprocessing in response to positive rapid indicators. Control endoscope channels were free of biologic residue and viable microbes. CONCLUSION: Despite reprocessing in accordance with US guidelines, viable microbes and biologic debris persisted on clinically used gastrointestinal endoscopes, suggesting current reprocessing guidelines are not sufficient to ensure successful decontamination.
BACKGROUND: Pathogens have been transmitted via flexible endoscopes that were reportedly reprocessed in accordance with guidelines. METHODS: Researchers observed reprocessing activities to ensure guideline compliance in a large gastrointestinal endoscopy unit. Contamination was assessed immediately after bedside cleaning, manual cleaning, high-level disinfection, and overnight storage via visual inspection, aerobic cultures, and tests for adenosine triphosphate (ATP), protein, carbohydrate, and hemoglobin. RESULTS: All colonoscopes and gastroscopes were reprocessed in accordance with guidelines during the study. Researchers collected and tested samples during 60 encounters with 15 endoscopes. Viable microbes were recovered from bedside-cleaned (92%), manually cleaned (46%), high-level disinfected (64%), and stored (9%) endoscopes. Rapid indicator tests detected contamination (protein, carbohydrate, hemoglobin, or ATP) above benchmarks on bedside-cleaned (100%), manually cleaned (92%), high-level disinfected (73%), and stored (82%) endoscopes. Visible residue was never observed on endoscopes, but it was often seen on materials used to sample endoscopes. Seven endoscopes underwent additional reprocessing in response to positive rapid indicators. Control endoscope channels were free of biologic residue and viable microbes. CONCLUSION: Despite reprocessing in accordance with US guidelines, viable microbes and biologic debris persisted on clinically used gastrointestinal endoscopes, suggesting current reprocessing guidelines are not sufficient to ensure successful decontamination.
Authors: Sara Larsen; Rasmus Vinther Russell; Lotte Klinten Ockert; Stephen Spanos; Helena Strømstad Travis; Lars Holger Ehlers; Anders Mærkedahl Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2020-07-15
Authors: Nina Parohl; Doris Stiefenhöfer; Sabine Heiligtag; Henning Reuter; Dana Dopadlik; Frank Mosel; Guido Gerken; Alexander Dechêne; Evelyn Heintschel von Heinegg; Christoph Jochum; Jan Buer; Walter Popp Journal: GMS Hyg Infect Control Date: 2017-03-27
Authors: Cori L Ofstead; Brandy L Buro; Krystina M Hopkins; John E Eiland; Harry P Wetzler; David R Lichtenstein Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2020-11-17
Authors: Valentina Marchese; Daniele Di Carlo; Gaetano Fazio; Santi Mauro Gioè; Angelo Luca; Rossella Alduino; Monica Rizzo; Fabio Tuzzolino; Francesco Monaco; Pier Giulio Conaldi; Bruno Douradinha; Giuseppina Di Martino Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 3.390