Literature DB >> 26233809

Do additional imaging studies change operative management in patients undergoing adrenalectomy?

Irene Lou1, David F Schneider1, Glen E Leverson1, Rebecca S Sippel1, Herbert Chen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of a secondary imaging modality (SIM) in the workup of adrenal masses and the usefulness of this additional imaging in changing surgical management.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of our adrenalectomy database was performed on adult patients who underwent ≥1 imaging study before surgery. A multivariate logistic regression model was then constructed to identify patient factors that predisposed SIM.
RESULTS: From February 2001 to August 2014, 264 cases met inclusion criteria, of which 98 (37%) were identified to have SIM. Patients with cancer (P = .001), incidentaloma (P = .002), and pheochromocytoma (P < .0001) were more likely to undergo additional imaging. MRI was the most commonly obtained SIM. In addition, 90 of the 98 cases (92%) met indications for adrenalectomy with primary imaging study and biochemical screening alone. Of the remaining 8 cases, in only 4 instances (4%) did SIM modify surgical decision making.
CONCLUSION: The high incidence of unnecessary additional imaging performed in patients undergoing adrenalectomy is counterproductive to efforts toward cost-conscious, high-quality health care. Patients with adrenal tumors would benefit from early surgical referral to allow the surgeon to help guide clinical decision making and to avoid the use of excessive imaging.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233809      PMCID: PMC4567496          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  13 in total

Review 1.  Adrenal imaging.

Authors:  Michael A Blake; Carmel G Cronin; Giles W Boland
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons medical guidelines for the management of adrenal incidentalomas.

Authors:  Martha A Zeiger; Geoffrey B Thompson; Quan-Yang Duh; Amir H Hamrahian; Peter Angelos; Dina Elaraj; Elliott Fishman; Julia Kharlip
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Ursula Lechel; Gerhard Glatting; Sibylle I Ziegler; Wolfgang Münzing; Stefan P Müller; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Trends in adrenalectomy: a recent national review.

Authors:  Melissa M Murphy; Elan R Witkowski; Sing Chau Ng; Theodore P McDade; Joshua S Hill; Anne C Larkin; Giles F Whalen; Demetrius E Litwin; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series.

Authors:  S Bovio; A Cataldi; G Reimondo; P Sperone; S Novello; A Berruti; P Borasio; C Fava; L Dogliotti; G V Scagliotti; A Angeli; M Terzolo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  Characterization of adrenal masses by using FDG PET: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  Giles W L Boland; Ben A Dwamena; Minal Jagtiani Sangwaiya; Alexander G Goehler; Michael A Blake; Peter F Hahn; James A Scott; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Trends in utilization of adrenalectomy in the United States: have indications changed?

Authors:  Brian D Saunders; Reid M Wainess; Justin B Dimick; Gilbert R Upchurch; Gerard M Doherty; Paul G Gauger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Adrenal masses in the cancer patient: surveillance or excision.

Authors:  Ian C Mitchell; Fiemu E Nwariaku
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-02

9.  Needle biopsy of incidentally discovered adrenal masses is rarely informative and potentially hazardous.

Authors:  Frank J Quayle; Jennifer A Spitler; Richard A Pierce; Terry C Lairmore; Jeffrey F Moley; L Michael Brunt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Isolated adrenal mass in patients with a history of cancer: remember pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Joel T Adler; Eberhard Mack; Herbert Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  2 in total

1.  Association between Tumor Size and Malignancy Risk in Hormonally Inactive Adrenal Incidentalomas.

Authors:  Veli Vural; Eyyüp M Kılınç; Demet Sarıdemir; İsmail B Gök; Amil Hüseynov; Alim Akbarov; Muhittin Yaprak
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-01-06

Review 2.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.