Literature DB >> 26233672

Data-driven risk identification in phase III clinical trials using central statistical monitoring.

Catherine Timmermans1, David Venet2, Tomasz Burzykowski3,4.   

Abstract

Our interest lies in quality control for clinical trials, in the context of risk-based monitoring (RBM). We specifically study the use of central statistical monitoring (CSM) to support RBM. Under an RBM paradigm, we claim that CSM has a key role to play in identifying the "risks to the most critical data elements and processes" that will drive targeted oversight. In order to support this claim, we first see how to characterize the risks that may affect clinical trials. We then discuss how CSM can be understood as a tool for providing a set of data-driven key risk indicators (KRIs), which help to organize adaptive targeted monitoring. Several case studies are provided where issues in a clinical trial have been identified thanks to targeted investigation after the identification of a risk using CSM. Using CSM to build data-driven KRIs helps to identify different kinds of issues in clinical trials. This ability is directly linked with the exhaustiveness of the CSM approach and its flexibility in the definition of the risks that are searched for when identifying the KRIs. In practice, a CSM assessment of the clinical database seems essential to ensure data quality. The atypical data patterns found in some centers and variables are seen as KRIs under a RBM approach. Targeted monitoring or data management queries can be used to confirm whether the KRIs point to an actual issue or not.

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Multicenter study; Quality assurance; Risk management

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233672     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-015-0877-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  16 in total

1.  Data fraud in clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephen L George; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2015

2.  Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials.

Authors:  Sanaa Al-Marzouki; Stephen Evans; Tom Marshall; Ian Roberts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-30

3.  Monitoring the quality of conduct of clinical trials: a survey of current practices.

Authors:  Briggs W Morrison; Chrissy J Cochran; Jennifer Giangrande White; Joan Harley; Cynthia F Kleppinger; An Liu; Jules T Mitchel; David F Nickerson; Cynthia R Zacharias; Judith M Kramer; James D Neaton
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials.

Authors:  Janice M Pogue; P J Devereaux; Kristian Thorlund; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Linear mixed-effects models for central statistical monitoring of multicenter clinical trials.

Authors:  L Desmet; D Venet; E Doffagne; C Timmermans; T Burzykowski; C Legrand; M Buyse
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Comparison of sibrafiban with aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes: a randomised trial. The SYMPHONY Investigators. Sibrafiban versus Aspirin to Yield Maximum Protection from Ischemic Heart Events Post-acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-29       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Ensuring trial validity by data quality assurance and diversification of monitoring methods.

Authors:  Colin Baigent; Frank E Harrell; Marc Buyse; Jonathan R Emberson; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Central and statistical data monitoring in the Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage (CRASH-2) trial.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Haleema Shakur; Lin Barnetson; David Prieto; Stephen Evans; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Application of methods for central statistical monitoring in clinical trials.

Authors:  Amy A Kirkwood; Trevor Cox; Allan Hackshaw
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  The value of source data verification in a cancer clinical trial.

Authors:  Catrin Tudur Smith; Deborah D Stocken; Janet Dunn; Trevor Cox; Paula Ghaneh; David Cunningham; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fraud in clinical trials: complex problem, simple solutions?

Authors:  Junichi Sakamoto; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Monitoring performance of sites within multicentre randomised trials: a systematic review of performance metrics.

Authors:  Kate F Walker; Julie Turzanski; Diane Whitham; Alan Montgomery; Lelia Duley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  Central statistical monitoring of investigator-led clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Laura Trotta; Everardo D Saad; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Dynamic methods for ongoing assessment of site-level risk in risk-based monitoring of clinical trials: A scoping review.

Authors:  William J Cragg; Caroline Hurley; Victoria Yorke-Edwards; Sally P Stenning
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.486

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.