Literature DB >> 26233270

Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Benjamin G Domb1, Justin M LaReau2, Jon E Hammarstedt3, Asheesh Gupta3, Christine E Stake3, John M Redmond4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To detail our early experience using concomitant hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia.
METHODS: We prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed the surgical and outcome data of 17 patients who underwent concomitant hip arthroscopy and PAO between October 2010 and July 2013. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, outcome and pain scores, and radiographic data were collected. Intraoperative arthroscopic findings and postoperative complications were recorded.
RESULTS: The group consisted of 3 male and 14 female patients with a mean follow-up period of 2.4 years. Three patients had undergone previous surgery on the affected hip. Chondrolabral pathology was identified in all 17 patients. Twelve patients underwent labral repair, and five patients underwent partial labral debridement. No patient was converted to total hip arthroplasty or required revision surgery at short-term follow-up. All 4 patient-reported outcome scores showed statistically significant changes from baseline to latest follow-up (P < .001). An excellent outcome was obtained in 82% of patients (13 of 16). The lateral center-edge angle averaged 11° preoperatively and 29° postoperatively. The acetabular inclination averaged 18° preoperatively and 3° postoperatively. The anterior center-edge angle averaged 7° preoperatively and 27° postoperatively. At most recent radiographic follow-up, 1 patient had progression of arthritic changes but remained asymptomatic. No other patient showed any radiographic evidence of progression of arthritis. Complications included 3 superficial wound infections, 1 pulmonary embolism, and 1 temporary sciatic neurapraxia.
CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience with concomitant hip arthroscopy and PAO has been favorable. We noted that all our patients have evidence of chondrolabral damage at the time of PAO when the joint is distracted and evaluated. All patients in this series had intra-articular pathology treated arthroscopically and showed satisfactory mean clinical improvement. Hip arthroscopy with PAO did not appear to introduce complications beyond the PAO alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233270     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  19 in total

1.  [Hip arthroscopy].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; I J Banke; J Schauwecker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Outcomes of Surgical Management of Borderline Hip Dysplasia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cameron Barton; Elizabeth Scott; Zain M Khazi; Michael Willey; Robert Westermann
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

3.  What Are the Results of Surgical Treatment of Hip Dysplasia With Concomitant Cam Deformity?

Authors:  Jens Goronzy; Lea Franken; Albrecht Hartmann; Falk Thielemann; Anne Postler; Tobias Paulus; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Arthroscopic Hip Joint Assessment can Impact the Indications for PAO Surgery.

Authors:  Marcin Wasko; Jeffrey J Nepple; John C Clohisy; Cecilia Pascual-Garrido
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

5.  Combined Surgical Approach to Young Adults with Hip Dysplasia and Concomitant Intra-Articular Pathology Using Intra-Abdominal Monitoring.

Authors:  Robert J Wetzel; Noah M Joseph; Derrick M Knapik; Jonathan Copp; Michael J Salata
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

6.  Hip Arthroscopy Prior to Periacetabular Osteotomy Does Not Increase Operative Time or Complications: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Alan G Shamrock; Robert W Westermann; Trevor R Gulbrandsen; Zain M Khazi; Christopher N Carender; Michael C Willey
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

7.  A comparison of 6-month outcomes between periacetabular osteotomy with concomitant hip arthroscopy to isolated hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Thomas Ellis; Dave Kohlrieser; Brian Rao; Keelan Enseki; Adam Popchak; RobRoy L Martin
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  What Mid-term Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores, Reoperations, and Complications Are Associated with Concurrent Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy to Treat Dysplasia with Associated Intraarticular Abnormalities?

Authors:  Adam I Edelstein; Jeffrey J Nepple; Wahid Abu-Amer; Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; Charles W Goss; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yoichi Murata; Naomasa Fukase; Maitland Martin; Rui Soares; Lauren Pierpoint; Grant J Dornan; Soshi Uchida; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-04

10.  Hip dysplasia in wrestlers: three lessons learned.

Authors:  J W Thomas Byrd; John C Clohisy; Young-Jo Kim; F Winston Gwathmey; Kay S Jones; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2017-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.